<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The gel system has been reported to be more sensitive and specific than the conventional tube indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) for antibody screening. However, a major concern about the gel system is its cost. A cost analysis study was therefore conducted at our hospital. The gel system costs more than the conventional tube IAT per test; however, the total staff and reagent costs per year were about equal, because of staff savings. Workload and cost per patient requiring blood were reduced using the gel system. <bold><italic>Immunohematology</italic></bold> 1996;12:30-32.</p></abstract>

The gel system has been reported to be more sensitive and specific than the conventional tube indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) for antibody screening. However, a major concern about the gel system is its cost. A cost analysis study was therefore conducted at our hospital. The gel system costs more than the conventional tube IAT per test; however, the total staff and reagent costs per year were about equal, because of staff savings. Workload and cost per patient requiring blood were reduced using the gel system. Immunohematology 1996;12:30-32.

The impact of a gel system on routine work in a general hospital blood bank

Immunohematology

{"article-title":"The impact of a gel system on routine work in a general hospital blood bank"}

The gel system has been reported to be more sensitive and specific than the conventional tube indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) for antibody screening. However,...

The impact of a gel system on routine work in a general hospital blood bank

Online veröffentlicht: 10. Nov. 2020

Seitenbereich: 30 - 32

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/immunohematology-2019-743

© 1996 A. Chan et al., published by Sciendo