George ML, Rowlands D, Price M, Macey J. The lean Six Sigma pocket tool book. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
Butch SH, Stoe MJ, Bensette MM, Downs T. Process flow changes for operation of a bidirectional interface for ABO/Rh typing and antibody screening (abstract). Transfusion 2006;46(Suppl): 214A.Search in Google Scholar
Butch SH, Stoe MJ. Implementing automation without an interface (abstract). AABB Annual Meeting. October 24–26, 2004. Transfusion 2004; 44(Suppl):174AS.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng G, Chan A, Chun M, Wong L. Evaluation of the gel test for antibody screening in a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong; insensitivity for some cold antibodies that are reactive at 37 degrees C by conventional indirect antiglobulin tests. Clin Lab Haematol 1995:81-4.10.1111/j.1365-2257.1995.tb00323.x7621635Search in Google Scholar
Daniel-Johnson JA, Rumsey DH. Increased frequency of warm autoantibodies of undetermined specificity in gel techniques compared to tube testing (abstract). Transfusion 2006;46 (Suppl):217.Search in Google Scholar
Dwyre DM, Erickson Y, Heintz M, Elbert C, Strauss RG. Comparative sensitivity of solid phase versus PEG enhancement assays for detection and identification of RBC antibodies. Transfus Apher Sci 2006;35:19-23.10.1016/j.transci.2006.02.00216905362Search in Google Scholar
Weisbach V, Kohnhauser T, Zimmermann R, Ringwald J, Strasser E, Zingsem J, Eckstein R. Comparison of the performance of microtube column systems and solid-phase systems and the tube low-ionic-strength solution additive indirect antiglobulin test in the detection of red cell alloantibodies. Transfus Med 2006;16:276-84.10.1111/j.1365-3148.2006.00674.x16879156Search in Google Scholar
Bunker ML, Thomas CL, Geyer SJ. Optimizing pretransfusion antibody detection and identification: a parallel, blinded comparison of tube PEG, solid-phase, and automated methods. Transfusion 2001;41:621-6.10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41050621.x11346697Search in Google Scholar
Onda AE, Viernes AL. Analysis of the introduction of automation to the TAT in a large metropolitan hospital blood center (abstract). Transfusion 2007;47(Suppl):265A.Search in Google Scholar
Butch SH, Stoe MJ. Decreasing turn-around times for specimen processing using the ProVue™ (abstract). Transfusion 2004;44(Suppl):178A.Search in Google Scholar
42 CFR 493.1256 (d) (5) Subpart K Quality System for Nonwaived Testing Standard: Control procedures.Search in Google Scholar
CLSI EP12-A2 User Protocol for Evaluation of Qualitative Test Performance; Approved Guideline–Second Edition, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
CLSI EP15-A2 User Verification of Performance for Precision and Trueness; Approved Guideline– Second Edition, 2006.Search in Google Scholar
