Ohio Association of Blood Banks Proficiency Sample: Results for a D^u Specimen

1.Konugres AA, Polesky HF, Walker RH. Rh immune globulin and the Rh-positive, D^u-variant mother. Transfusion 1982;22:76–7.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1982.22182154227.x6801831Search in Google Scholar

2.Lacey PA, Caskey CR, Werner DJ, Moulds JJ. Fetal hemolytic disease of a newborn due to anti-D in an Rh-positive D^u-variant mother. Transfusion 1983; 23:91–4.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1983.23283172867.x6404025Search in Google Scholar

3.Broman B. Swedish thoughts on D^u nomenclature. Transfusion 1984;24:85.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1984.24184122572.x6420956Search in Google Scholar

4.Moore BPL. D^u terminology revisited. Transfusion 1983;23:401.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1983.23584018720.x6414130Search in Google Scholar

5.Issitt PD. Applied blood group serology. 3rd ed. Miami: Montgomery Scientific Publications, 1985:647.Search in Google Scholar

6.Widmann FK. Questions and answers. AABB News Briefs 1987;10(No. 3):13–4.Search in Google Scholar

7.Zuck TF. D^u terminology revisited. Transfusion 1983;23:90.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1983.23283172866.x6404024Search in Google Scholar

8.Issitt PD. Applied blood group serology. 3rd ed. Miami: Montgomery Scientific Publications, 1985:234–5.Search in Google Scholar

9.Widmann FK, ed. Technical manual. 9th ed. Arlington, VA: American Association of Blood Banks, 1985:319–20.Search in Google Scholar