Low-ionic-strength saline solution–antiglobulin test (LISS-AGT)

1. Wicker B, Wallas CH. A comparison of a low ionic strength saline medium with routine methods for antibody detection. Transfusion 1976;16:469–71.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1976.16577039305.x824767 Search in Google Scholar

2. Elloit M, Bossom E, Dupuy M, Masouredis S. Effect of ionic strength on the behaviour of red cell isoantibodies. Vox Sang 1964;9:395–414. Search in Google Scholar

3. Hughes-Jones N, Gardner B, Telford R. The effect of pH and ionic strength on the reaction between anti-D and erythrocytes. Immunology 1964;7:72–81. Search in Google Scholar

4. Hughes-Jones N, Polley M, Telford R, Gardner B, Kleinschmidt G. Optimal conditions for detection blood group antibodies in the antiglobulin test. Vox Sang 1964;9:385–95.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1964.tb03307.x14177428 Search in Google Scholar

5. Löw B, Messeter L. Antiglobulin test in low-ionic strength salt solution for rapid antibody screening and cross-matching. Vox Sang 1974;26:53–61.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1974.tb02666.x4420622 Search in Google Scholar

6. Haigh T, Fairham S. Advantages of low ionic strength saline (LISS) techniques in blood bank management. Med Lab Sci 1980;37:119–25. Search in Google Scholar

7. Lown J, Barr A, Davis R. Use of low ionic strength saline for crossmatching and antibody screening. J Clin Path 1979;32:1019–24.10.1136/jcp.32.10.10191145884521495 Search in Google Scholar

8. Silvergeid A. Evaluation of a low-ionic-strength solution-monospecific anti-IgG antiglobulin technique for donor antibody screening. Transfusion 1980;20:729–32.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1980.20681057166.x6968994 Search in Google Scholar

9. Greendyke R, Banzhaf J, Inglis J. A comparison of six procedures for compatibility testing. Transfusion 1979;19: 782–6.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1979.19680104110.x524436 Search in Google Scholar

10. Merry A, Thomson E, Lagar J, et al. Quantitation of antibody binding to erythrocytes in LISS. Vox Sang 1984;47:125–32.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1984.tb01574.x6464414 Search in Google Scholar

11. Combs M, Bredehoeft S. Selecting an acceptable and safe antibody detection test can present a dilemma. Immunohematology 2001;17:86–9.10.21307/immunohematology-2019-553 Search in Google Scholar

12. Reilly B, DePalma H, Cosgrove P, et al. Comparison between routine tube test (LISS), PEG tube test, gel technology and solid-phase red cell adherence assays (abstract). Transfusion 1997;37:64S. Search in Google Scholar

13. Dinardo C, Bonifacio S, Mendrone A. Indirect antiglobulin test-crossmatch using low-ionic-strength saline–albumin enhancement medium and reduced incubation time: effectiveness in the detection of most clinically significant antibodies and impact on blood utilization. Immunohematology 2014:30:1–5.10.21307/immunohematology-2019-090 Search in Google Scholar

14. Ortho Antibody Enhancement Media [package insert]. Raritan, NJ: Ortho Clinical Diagnostics; 2015. Search in Google Scholar

15. Gamma Lo-Ion [package insert]. Norcross, GA: Immucor, Inc., 2009. Search in Google Scholar

16. Gamma N-Hance [package insert]. Norcross, GA: Immucor, Inc., 2009. Search in Google Scholar

17. LISS Additive Reagent, ALBAhance [package insert]. Quotient Bioscience Ltd., 2013. Search in Google Scholar

18. MLB2, Modified LISS Solution [package insert]. BioRad Medical Diagnostics, 2016. Search in Google Scholar