Dynamic Measurements and Dynamically-Functioning Objects- Time Is to Look at Reality

[1]US Government Web Portal (Http://www.nist.gov) Search in Google Scholar

[2]US Government Web Portal (http://www.science.gov) Search in Google Scholar

[3]Web Portal of National Council for Advanced Manufacturing (http://www.nacfam.org) Search in Google Scholar

[4]Web Portal for Society of Manufacturing Engineering (http://www.sme.org) Search in Google Scholar

[5]Web Portal for US National Academy of Engineering (http://www.nae.edu) Search in Google Scholar

[6]Web Portal of Society for Experimental Mechanics (http://www.sem.org) Search in Google Scholar

[7]G. Abramchuk, K. Abramchuk, Fundamental Particulars of Dynamic Measurements in Conditions When Dynamics of Complex-Functioning Structure Is Not Set In: Problems and Solutions, Proceedings for Society for Experimental Mechanics Annual Conference & Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics, Springfield, Massachusetts, 3-7 June, 2007, USA Search in Google Scholar

[8]G. Abramchuk, Increasing Measurement Accuracy of Quickly-Proceeding Processes As Future of Structural Dynamics, Journal of VIBROENGINEERING (ISSN 1392 – 8716), No.2 (9) (149-150), pp. 31-34, 2002 Search in Google Scholar

[9]T. L. Paez, The History of Random Vibrations Through 1958, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 20, Issue: 8, 2006, pp. 1783-1818 Search in Google Scholar

[10]G. Abramchuk, K. Abramchuk, Ill- conditioned Problem, Distributed Structure, and Changing Equation of Measurements (Problem and Solutions). Instrumentation & Measurement Technology Conference, , 2005, IMTC 2005, Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol.1, May 16-19 2005, pp.483-487 Search in Google Scholar

[11]G. Abramchuk, K. Abramchuk, Some Aspects of Transformation of Measurement Transducer in Measuring Structure in a Measurement Channel during Dynamic Measurements, SENSORS & TRANSDUCERS Journal (ISSN 1726- 5479), Vol. 70, Issue 8, August 2006, pp.679-685 Search in Google Scholar

[12]A. A. Bazhenov, V. I. Yarovikov, A Universal Mathematical Model of Piezoelectric Transducers of Mechanical Quantities with Distributed Parameters, Izmeritel’naya Tekhnika, 2007, No.12, pp.30-35 Search in Google Scholar

[13]G. Abramchuk, K. Abramchuk, About Method of Measurements Quickly-Proceeding Processes (Problem, Task, Decision), Proceedings of The 73rd Shock and Vibration Symposium, SAVIAC, November 18-22, 2002, Newport, Rode Island, USA Search in Google Scholar

[14]G. Abramchuk, K. Abramchuk, Methodical Feature of Measurement of Quickly-Proceeding Processes in Distributive Structures in Great Speed of Load and Small Amplitudes, Conference Proceedings of the IMAC-XXI: A Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics (Innovative Measurement Technologies), February 3-6, 2003, Kissimmee, Florida,USA Search in Google Scholar

[15]G. Abramchuk, K. Abramchuk, Standard Drop-Test and the Different Response of Very Same Object, SENSORS & TRANSDUCEDS Journal, Vol. 57, Issue 7, July 2005, pp. 360-365 Search in Google Scholar

[16]S. Gade, T. Schack, O. Thorhauge, H. Herlufsen, Transducer Response Equalization, Conference Proceedings of the IMAC- XXVI: Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics (Technologies for Civil Structures),February 4-7 2008, Orlando, Florida USA Search in Google Scholar

[17]Pusey H. C., Turbo-machinery Condition Monitoring and Failure Prognosis, Sound and Vibration Magazine, 2007 No.3, pp.2,3, 10-12 Search in Google Scholar

[18]Jardine A. K. S., Lin D., Banjevic D., A Review on Machinery Diagnostics and Prognostics Implementing Condition-based Maintenance, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2006, 20 pp.1483-1510Search in Google Scholar