Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Communication networks of an integrated project delivery team for construction: relationships between formal and informal communication networks


Zitieren

Figure 1:

The formal communication networks by gender, organizational affiliation, and outdegree centrality. Node size represents outdegree centrality with larger nodes having higher outdegree and node color gender [red = female, light blue = male]. Node shapes represent organizational affiliation [square = owner, circle = architect/engineer, triangle = general- or sub-contractor]. Edge thickness represents communication frequency. Layout algorithm is Kamada-Kawai.
The formal communication networks by gender, organizational affiliation, and outdegree centrality. Node size represents outdegree centrality with larger nodes having higher outdegree and node color gender [red = female, light blue = male]. Node shapes represent organizational affiliation [square = owner, circle = architect/engineer, triangle = general- or sub-contractor]. Edge thickness represents communication frequency. Layout algorithm is Kamada-Kawai.

Figure 2:

The informal communication networks by gender, organizational affiliation, and outdegree centrality. Node size represents outdegree centrality with larger nodes having higher outdegree and node color represents actors’ gender [red = female, light blue = male]. Node shapes represent organizational affiliation [square = owner, circle = architect/engineer, triangle = general or sub-contractor]. Edge thickness represents communication frequency. Layout algorithm is Kamada-Kawai.
The informal communication networks by gender, organizational affiliation, and outdegree centrality. Node size represents outdegree centrality with larger nodes having higher outdegree and node color represents actors’ gender [red = female, light blue = male]. Node shapes represent organizational affiliation [square = owner, circle = architect/engineer, triangle = general or sub-contractor]. Edge thickness represents communication frequency. Layout algorithm is Kamada-Kawai.

Valued ERGM predicting informal communication tie strength.

ParameterDimensionMLE (SE)
SumTie-dependencies13.01 (3.29)***
Transitivity0.67 (0.13)***
Degree centralization−1.64 (0.02)***
Formal communication tiesMultiplexity1.56 (0.17)***
Same ethnicityHomophily by ethnicity−0.38 (0.67)
Hispanic/Latin indegreeAttribute popularity by ethnicity0.12 (0.71)
Hispanic/Latin outdegreeAttribute activity by ethnicity5.71 (1.39)***
Female indegreeAttribute popularity by gender (base = male)−1.81 (0.34)***
Female outdegreeAttribute activity by gender−16.36 (2.04)***
Some college indegreeAttribute popularity by education (base = high school graduate or less)−2.10 (0.58)***
College degree indegree−0.12 (0.37)
Graduate degree indegree0.73 (0.33)*
Some college outdegreeAttribute activity by education−32.79 (4.40)***
College degree outdegree−4.39 (1.29)***
Graduate degree outdegree5.06 (1.02)***
Age group indegreeAttribute popularity by age groups0.34 (0.08)***
Age group outdegreeAttribute activity by age groups4.27 (0.52)***
Architect/Engineer indegreeAttribute popularity by organizational affiliation (base = owner)−1.12 (0.38)**
GC/SC indegree−0.76 (0.33)*
Architect/Engineer outdegreeAttribute activity by organizational affiliation−8.11 (1.18)***
GC/SC outdegree−5.09 (0.88)***
Introvert indegreePopularity by extrovert vs. introvert−0.68 (0.20)***
Introvert outdegreeActivity by extrovert vs. introvert−5.43 (0.77)***
Observant indegreePopularity by intuitive vs. observant−0.54 (0.15)***
Observant outdegreeActivity by intuitive vs. observant−2.37 (0.80)**
Feeling indegreePopularity by thinking vs. feeling0.70 (0.21)***
Feeling outdegreeActivity by thinking vs. feeling11.47 (1.44)***
Judging indegreePopularity by perceptive vs. judging0.28 (0.26)
Judging outdegreeActivity by perceptive vs. judging0.63 (0.68)
Years in organization indegreeContinuous attribute popularity by organizational tenure−0.80 (0.17)***
Years in organization outdegreeContinuous attribute activity by organizational tenure−8.96 (1.34)***
Years in position indegreeContinuous attribute popularity by career experiences0.46 (0.12)***
Years in position outdegreeContinuous attribute activity by career experiences5.81 (0.82)***
Non-IPD indegreeAttribute popularity (base = IPD experience)−0.05 (0.22)
Non-IPD outdegreeAttribute activity0.03 (0.60)

Valued ERGM predicting formal communication tie strength.

ParameterDimensionImagesMLE estimate (SE)
SumTie-dependencies−0.45 (0.28)
Reciprocity0.22 (0.05)***
Transitivity−0.01 (0.02)
Degree centralization−2.61 (0.03)***
Informal communication networkMultiplexity0.50 (0.04)***
Same ethnicityHomophily−0.79 (0.05)***
Same current positionsHomophily−0.03(0.02)
Female indegreeAttribute popularity0.14 (0.06)*
Female outdegreeAttribute activity0.81 (0.07)***
Some college indegreeAttribute popularity by education−0.71 (0.08)***
College degree indegree0.28 (0.05)***
Graduate degree indegree0.63 (0.06)***
Some college outdegreeAttribute activity by education−0.88 (0.11)***
College degree outdegree0.82 (0.07)***
Graduate degree outdegree1.65 (0.08)***
Hispanic/Latin indegreeAttribute popularity by ethnicity−0.97 (0.32)**
Hispanic/Latin outdegreeAttribute activity0.47 (0.15)**
Architect/Engineer indegreeAttribute popularity by organizational affiliation (base = owner)0.05 (0.08)
GC/SC indegree0.30 (0.07)***
Architect/Engineer outdegreeAttribute activity by organizational affiliation0.44 (0.08)
GC/SC outdegree1.32 (0.08)***
Non-IPD indegreeAttribute popularity0.09 (0.04)*
Non-IPD outdegreeAttribute activity0.73 (0.07)***
Years in organization indegreeContinuous attribute popularity−0.25 (0.02)***
Years in organization outdegreeContinuous attribute activity−0.36 (0.03)***
Years in position indegreeContinuous attribute popularity0.39 (0.08)***
Years in position outdegreeContinuous attribute activity0.75 (0.03)***

MR-QAP predicting formal communication (FC) tie strength.

Standardized coefficientp valueAs LargeAs SmallSE
FC-Indegree preferential attachment−0.110.03*0.970.030.01
FC-Transitivity0.640.00***0.001.000.00
FC-Reciprocity0.730.00***0.001.000.05
FC-Cyclicality−0.440.00***1.000.000.00
Same Organization−0.010.280.720.280.40
Receiver Organization−0.050.03*0.970.030.54
Sender Organization0.120.01*0.010.991.36
Same Sex0.030.070.070.930.92
Sender Judging vs. Perceptive0.010.420.420.582.99
Sender Feeling vs. Thinking0.080.04*0.040.963.00
Sender Observant vs. Intuitive−0.040.140.860.142.32
Sender Introvert vs. Extrovert0.130.00***0.001.002.77
Sender previous non-IPD experience−0.030.230.770.233.32
Sender Years in Current Position0.030.260.260.741.16
Sender Years in Organization−0.010.410.590.411.00
Sender Education0.170.00***0.001.001.97
Same Ethnicity−0.060.02*0.980.021.31
Sender Age0.020.290.290.711.06
IC0.020.200.200.810.24
IC-Indegree Preferential Attachment0.090.02*0.020.980.09
IC-Transitivity−0.030.150.850.150.03
IC-Reciprocity−0.050.03*0.970.030.24
IC-Cyclicality0.070.01*0.010.990.02
Intercept0.000.00***0.000.000.00
eISSN:
0226-1766
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
Volume Open
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Sozialwissenschaften, andere