[
Berninghaus, S. K., Ehrhart, K.-M., & Ott, M. (2006). A Network Experiment in Continuous Time: The Influence of Link Costs. Experimental Economics, 9(3), 237-251.10.1007/s10683-006-9125-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bienenstock, E. J., & Bonacich, P. (1992). The core as a solution to exclusionary networks. Social Networks, 14(3-4), 231-243.10.1016/0378-8733(92)90003-P
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bienenstock, E. J., & Bonacich, P. (1993). Game-Theory Models for Exchange Networks: Experimental Results. Sociological Perspectives, 36(2), 117-135.10.2307/1389425
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borch, C., & Willer, D. (2006). Power, Embedded Games, and Coalition Formation. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 30, 77-111.10.1080/00222500500328928
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braun, N., & Gautschi, T. (2006). A Nash Bargaining Model for Simple Exchange Networks. Social Networks, 28(1), 1-23.10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burke, P. J. (1997). An Identity Model for Network Exchange. American Sociological Review, 62(1), 134-134.10.2307/2657456
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buskens, V., Corten, R., & Raub, W. (2014). Social Networks. In N. Braun & N. J. Saam (Eds.), Handbuch Modellbildung und Simulation in den Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden: Springer, (pp. 663-687).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buskens, V., Raub, W., & van der Veer, J. (2010). Trust in Triads: An Experimental Study. Social Networks, 32(4), 301-312.10.1016/j.socnet.2010.05.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buskens, V., & Van De Rijt, A. (2008). Sequential Power-Dependence Theory. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 32(2), 110-128.10.1080/00222500801931669
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Callander, S., & Plott, C. R. (2005). Principles of Network Development and Evolution: An Experimental Study. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1469-1495.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.03.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carrillo, J. D., & Gaduh, A. (2012). The Strategic Formation of Networks: Experimental Evidence. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP8757.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cook, K. S., Cheshire, C., Rice, E. R. W., & Nakagawa, S. (2013). Social Exchange Theory. In J. DeLamater & A. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, Dordrecht: Springer, 61-88.10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cook, K. S., & Emerson, R. M. (1978). Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks. American Sociological Review, 43(5), 721-139.10.2307/2094546
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cook, K. S., & Emerson, R. M. (1984). Exchange Networks and the Aalysis of Complex Oranizations. In S. B. Bacharach & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Resesarch in the Sociology of Organizations. The Social Psychological Processes, 3 ed., Greenwich, CT:JAI, 1-30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cook, K. S., Emerson, R. M., Gillmore, M. R., & Yamagishi, T. (1983). The Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks -- Theory and Experimental Results. American Journal of Sociology, 89(2), 275-305.10.1086/227866
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cook, K. S., & Gillmore, M. R. (1984). Power, Dependence, and Coalitions. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in Group Processes. A Research Annual. London: JAI Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cook, K. S., & Yamagishi, T. (1992). Power in Exchange Networks: a Power-Dependence Formulation. Social Networks, 14, 245-265.10.1016/0378-8733(92)90004-Q
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Corten, R., & Buskens, V. (2010). Co-evolution of Conventions and Networks: An Experimental Study. Social Networks, 32, 4-15.10.1016/j.socnet.2009.04.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Emerson, R. M. (1972a). Exchange Theory, Part I: A Psychological Basis for Social Exchange. In J. Berger, M. Z. Jr & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress, Vol. 1. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 58-87.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Emerson, R. M. (1972b). Exchange Theory, Part II: Exchange Relations and Networks. In J. Berger, M. Z. Jr & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress, Vol. 2, Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 58-87.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Falk, A., & Kosfeld, M. (2012). It’s All About Connections: Evidence on Network Formation. Review of Network Economics, 11(3).10.1515/1446-9022.1402
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frey, V., Buskens, V., & Raub, W. (2015). Embedding Trust: A Game-Theoretic Model for Investments in and Returns on Network Embeddedness. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 39(1), 39-72.10.1080/0022250X.2014.897947
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frey, V., Corten, R., & Buskens, V. (2012). Equilibrium Selection in Network Coordination Games: An Experimental Study. Review of Network Economics, 11(3), 1-26.10.1515/1446-9022.1365
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Friedkin, N. E. (1992). An Expected Value Model of Social Power: Predictions for Selected Exchange Networks. Social Networks, 14, 213-229.10.1016/0378-8733(92)90002-O
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Friedkin, N. E. (1993). An Expected Value Model of Social Exchange Outcomes. Advances in Group Processes, 10, 163-193.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Friedkin, N. E. (1995). The Incidence of Exchange Networks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(3), 213-213).10.2307/2787043
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goeree, J. K., Riedl, A., & Ule, A. (2009). In Search of Stars: Network Formation Among Heterogeneous Agents. Games and Economic Behavior, 67(2), 445-466.10.1016/j.geb.2008.12.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hauk, E., & Nagel, R. (2001). Choice of Partners in Multiple Two-Person Prisoner’s Dilemma Games: An Experimental Study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45(6), 770-793.10.1177/0022002701045006004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hegtvedt, K. A., & Markovsky, B. (1995). Justice and Injustice. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology: Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 257-280.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kirchsteiger, G., Mantovani, M., Mauleon, A., & Vannetelbosch, V. (2013). Limited Farsightedness in Network Formation. Report. Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kosfeld, M. (2004). Economic Networks in the Laboratory: A Survey. Review of Network Economics, 3(1), 20-42.10.2202/1446-9022.1041
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuwabara, K. (2011). Cohesion, Cooperation, and the Value of Doing Things Together: How Economic Exchange Creates Relational Bonds. American Sociological Review, 76(4), 560-580.10.1177/0003122411414825
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lawler, E. J. (1992). Affective Attachments to Nested Groups: A Choice-Process Theory. American Sociological Review, 57(3), 327-339.10.2307/2096239
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lawler, E. J. (1997). Affective Attachment to Nested Groups: The Role of Rational Choice Processes. In J. Skvoretz, J. Szmatka & J. Berger (Eds.), Status, Networks, and Structures: Theory Development in Group Processes (pp. 387-403). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lawler, E. J. (2001). An Affect Theory of Social Exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 321-352.10.1086/324071
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2000). Emotion and Group Cohesion in Productive Exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 106(3), 616-657.10.1086/318965
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2006). Commitment in Structurally Enabled and Induced Exchange Relations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(2), 183-200.10.1177/019027250606900204
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2008). Social Exchange and Micro Social Order. American Sociological Review, 73, 519-542.10.1177/000312240807300401
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1993). Power and the Emergence of Commitment Behavior in Negotiated Exchange. American Sociological Review, 58(4), 465-465.10.2307/2096071
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1996). Commitment in Exchange Relations: Test of a Theory of Relational Cohesion. American Sociological Review, 61(1), 89-108.10.2307/2096408
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1998). Network Structure and Emotion in Exchange Relations. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 871-894.10.2307/2657506
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W. R. (1980). Byond Fairness: A Theory of Allocation Preferences. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and Social Interaction, Experimental and Theoretical Contributions, from Psychological Research. Bern: Hans Huber Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lind, A. E., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lovaglia, M. J., Skvoretz, J., Willer, D., & Markovsky, B. (1995). Negotiated Exchanges in Social Networks. Social Forces, 74(1), 123-155.10.2307/2580626
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Markovsky, B. (1995). Developing an Exchange Network Simulator. Sociological Perspectives, 38(4), 519-545.10.2307/1389271
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Markovsky, B., Skvoretz, J., Willer, D., & Lovaglia, M. J. (1993). The Seeds of Weak Power: An Extension of Network Exchange Theory. American Sociological Review, 58(2), 197-209.10.2307/2095966
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Markovsky, B., Willer, D., & Patton, T. (1988). Power Relations in Exchange Networks. American Sociological Review, 53(2), 220-220.10.2307/2095689
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Markovsky, B., Willer, D., Simpson, B., & Lovaglia, M. J. (1997). Power in Exchange Networks: Critique of a New Theory. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 833-833.10.2307/2657363
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molm, L. D. (1997). Coercive Power in Social Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511570919
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molm, L. D. (2001). Theories of Social Exchange and Exchange Networks. In G. Ritzer & B. Smart (Eds.), Handbook of Social Theory, London: SAGE Publications, 260-273.10.4135/9781848608351.n20
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molm, L. D. (2003a). Power, Trust, and Fairness: Comparisons of Negotiated and Reciprocal Exchange. In S. R. Thye & J. Skvortz (Eds.), Advances in Group Processes: Power and Status, Vol. 20, UK: Emerald, 31-65.10.1016/S0882-6145(03)20002-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molm, L. D. (2003b). Theoretical Comparisons of Forms of Exchange. Sociological Theory, 21, 1-17.10.1111/1467-9558.00171
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molm, L. D. (2007). Experiments on Exchange Relations and Exchange Networks in Sociology. In M. Webster & J. Sell (Eds.), Laboratory Experiments in the Social Sciences, London: Elsevier, 379-406.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molm, L. D. (2010). The Structure of Reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(2), 119-131.10.1177/0190272510369079
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molm, L. D., Collett, J. L., & Schaefer, D. R. (2006). Conflict and Fairness in Social Exchange. Social Forces, 84(4), 2331-2352.10.1353/sof.2006.0100
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molm, L. D., Melamed, D., & Whitham, M. M. (2013). Behavioral Consequences of Embeddedness: Effects of the Underlying Forms of Exchange. Social Psychology Quarterly, 76(1), 73-97.10.1177/0190272512468284
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molm, L. D., Peterson, G., & Takahashi, N. (1999). Power in Negotiated and Reciprocal Exchange. American Sociological Review, 64(6), 876-876.10.2307/2657408
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molm, L. D., Peterson, G., & Takahashi, N. (2001). The Value of Exchange. Social Forces, 80(1), 159-184.10.1353/sof.2001.0081
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molm, L. D., Peterson, G., & Takahashi, N. (2003). In the Eye of the Beholder: Procedural Justice in Social Exchange. American Sociological Review, 68, 128-128.10.2307/3088905
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molm, L. D., Schaefer, D. R., & Collett, J. L. (2007). The Value of Reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 199-217.10.1177/019027250707000208
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molm, L. D., Takahashi, N., & Peterson, G. (2000). Risk and Trust in Social Exchange: An Experimental Test of a Classical Proposition. American Journal of Sociology, 105(5), 1396-1427.10.1086/210434
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Park, H., & Melamed, D. (2015). Reward Stability Promotes Group Commitment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78(4), 283-300.10.1177/0190272515609272
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raub, W., Buskens, V., & Frey, V. (2013). The Rationality of Social Structure: Cooperation in Social Dilemmas Through Investments in and Returns on Social Capital. Social Networks, 35(4), 720-732.10.1016/j.socnet.2013.05.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raub, W., Frey, V., & Buskens, V. (2014). Strategic Network Formation , Games on Networks, and Trust Analyse & Kritik, 1, 135-153.10.1515/auk-2014-0106
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simmel, G. (1964). Einleitung in die Moralwissenschaft: eine Kritik der ethischen Grundbegriffe, Bd. 1. In K. H. W. Wolff (Ed.), The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Glecoe: The Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simpson, B., & Macy, M. W. (2001). Collective Action and Power Inequality: Coalitions in Exchange Networks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(1), 88-100.10.2307/3090152
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simpson, B., & Macy, M. W. (2004). Power, Identity, and Collective Action in Social Exchange. Social Forces, 82, 1373-1409.10.1353/sof.2004.0096
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simpson, B., & Willer, D. (2005). The Structural Embeddedness of Collective Goods: Connection and Coalitions in Exchange Networks. Sociological Theory, 23(4), 386-407.10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00260.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Skvoretz, J., & Fararo, T. J. (1992). Power and Network Exchange: An Essay Toward Theoretical Unification. Social Networks, 14, 325-344.10.1016/0378-8733(92)90008-U
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Skvoretz, J., & Willer, D. (1993). Exclusion and Power: A Test of Four Theories of Power in Exchange Networks. American Sociological Review, 58(6), 801-818.10.2307/2095952
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thye, S. R. (2000). A Status Value Theory of Power in Exchange Relations. American Sociological Review, 65(3), 407-432.10.2307/2657464
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thye, S. R., Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (2011). The Emergence of Embedded Relations and Group Formation in Networks of Competition. Social Psychology Quarterly, 74, 387-413.10.1177/0190272511415553
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thye, S. R., Willer, D., & Markovsky, B. (2006). From Status to Power: New Models at the Intersection of Two Theories. Social Forces, 84(3), 1471-1495.10.1353/sof.2006.0070
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tsvetkova, M., & Buskens, V. (2013). Coordination on Egalitarian Networks From Asymmetric Relations in a Social Game of Chicken. Advances in Complex Systems, 16(01), 1-16.10.1142/S0219525913500057
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A Relational Model of Authority in Groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(C), 115-191.10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60283-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Dolder, D., & Buskens, V. (2014). Individual Choices in Dynamic Networks: An Experiment on Social Preferences. PLoS ONE, 9(4), 1-16.10.1371/journal.pone.0092276
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Miltenburg, N., Buskens, V., & Raub, W. (2012). Trust in Triads: Experience Effects. Social Networks, 34(4), 425-428.10.1016/j.socnet.2012.01.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walker, H. A., & Willer, D. (2014). Legitimizing Collective Action and Countervailing Power. Social Forces, 92(3), 1217-1239.10.1093/sf/sot116
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Willer, D., & Anderson, B. (1981). Networks, Exchange and Coercion. The Elemenary Theory and Its Applications. New York, Oxford: Elsevier.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Willer, D., & Emanuelson, P. (2008). Testing Ten Theories. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 32(3), 165-203.10.1080/00222500802148743
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Willer, D., Van Assen, M. A. L. M., & Emanuelson, P. (2012). Analyzing Large Scale Exchange Networks. Social Networks, 34(2), 171-180.Yamagishi, T., & Cook, K. S. (1993). Generalized Exchange and Social Dilemmas. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56(4), 235-248.10.1016/j.socnet.2011.11.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yamaguchi, K. (1996). Power in Networks of Substitutable and Complementary Exchange Relations: A Rational-Choice Model and an Analysis of Power Centralization. American Sociological Review, 61(2), 308-332.10.2307/2096336
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yoon, J., Thye, S. R., & Lawler, E. J. (2013). Exchange and Cohesion in Dyads and Triads: A Test of Simmel’s Hypothesis. Social Science Research, 42(6), 1457-1466.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.06.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zelditch, M. (2014). Laboratory Experiments in Sociology. In Webster, M. & Sell, J., Laboratory Experiments in the Social Sciences, 2 Ed., London: Elsevier, 183-197.
]Search in Google Scholar
