Prevalence of interproximal tooth reduction prescribed as part of initial Invisalign^® treatment in 10 orthodontic practices

1 Lapenaite E, Lopatiene K. Interproximal enamel reduction as a part of orthodontic treatment. Stomatologija 2014;16:19–24. LapenaiteE LopatieneK Interproximal enamel reduction as a part of orthodontic treatment Stomatologija 2014 16 19 24 Search in Google Scholar

2 Lusterman EA. Treatment of a Class II Division 2 malocclusion involving mesiodistal reduction of mandibular anterior teeth: report of a case. Am J Orthod 1954;40:44–50. LustermanEA Treatment of a Class II Division 2 malocclusion involving mesiodistal reduction of mandibular anterior teeth: report of a case Am J Orthod 1954 40 44 50 10.1016/0002-9416(54)90169-4 Search in Google Scholar

3 Chudasama D, Sheridan JJ. Guidelines for contemporary air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod 2007;41:315–20. ChudasamaD SheridanJJ Guidelines for contemporary air-rotor stripping J Clin Orthod 2007 41 315 20 Search in Google Scholar

4 Nazruddin T. Treatment of crowding teeth with interproximal reduction of the teeth. J Dent Res 1997;76:1209–10. NazruddinT Treatment of crowding teeth with interproximal reduction of the teeth J Dent Res 1997 76 1209 10 Search in Google Scholar

5 Sheridan JJ. The physiologic rationale for air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod 1997;31:609–12. SheridanJJ The physiologic rationale for air-rotor stripping J Clin Orthod 1997 31 609 12 Search in Google Scholar

6 Ballard ML. Asymmetry in tooth size: a factor in the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1944;14:67–70. BallardML Asymmetry in tooth size: a factor in the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of malocclusion Angle Orthod 1944 14 67 70 Search in Google Scholar

7 Bolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1958;23:113–30. BoltonWA Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion Angle Orthod 1958 23 113 30 Search in Google Scholar

8 Proffit W. Contemporary Orthodontics St Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2007. ProffitW Contemporary Orthodontics St Louis Mosby Elsevier 2007 Search in Google Scholar

9 Burke S, Burch JG, Tetz JA. Incidence and size of pretreatment overlap and posttreatment gingival embrasure space between maxillary central incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:506–11. BurkeS BurchJG TetzJA Incidence and size of pretreatment overlap and posttreatment gingival embrasure space between maxillary central incisors Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994 105 506 11 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70013-38166102 Search in Google Scholar

10 Boese LR. Fiberotomy and reproximation without lower retention 9 years in retrospect: part II. Angle Orthod 1980;50:169–78. BoeseLR Fiberotomy and reproximation without lower retention 9 years in retrospect: part II Angle Orthod 1980 50 169 78 Search in Google Scholar

11 Tuverson DL. Anterior interocclusal relations. Part I. American journal of orthodontics 1980;78:361–70. TuversonDL Anterior interocclusal relations. Part I American journal of orthodontics 1980 78 361 70 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90018-46933846 Search in Google Scholar

12 Zachrisson BU, Mjor IA. Remodeling of teeth by grinding. American journal of orthodontics 1975;68:545–53. ZachrissonBU MjorIA Remodeling of teeth by grinding American journal of orthodontics 1975 68 545 53 10.1016/0002-9416(75)90085-81059331 Search in Google Scholar

13 Boese LR. Fiberotomy and reproximation without lower retention, nine years in retrospect: part I. Angle Orthod 1980;50:88–97. BoeseLR Fiberotomy and reproximation without lower retention, nine years in retrospect: part I Angle Orthod 1980 50 88 97 Search in Google Scholar

14 Radlanski RJ, Jager A, Schwestka R, Bertzbach F. Plaque accumulations caused by interdental stripping. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:416–20. RadlanskiRJ JagerA SchwestkaR BertzbachF Plaque accumulations caused by interdental stripping Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988 94 416 20 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90131-X Search in Google Scholar

15 Piacentini C, Sfondrini G. A scanning electron microscopy comparison of enamel polishing methods after air-rotor stripping. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;109:57–63. PiacentiniC SfondriniG A scanning electron microscopy comparison of enamel polishing methods after air-rotor stripping Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999 109 57 63 10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70163-48540483 Search in Google Scholar

16 Rossouw PE, Tortorella A. A pilot investigation of enamel reduction procedures. J Can Dent Assoc 2003;69:384–8. RossouwPE TortorellaA A pilot investigation of enamel reduction procedures J Can Dent Assoc 2003 69 384 8 Search in Google Scholar

17 Jarjoura K, Gagnon G, Nieberg L. Caries risk after interproximal enamel reduction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:26–30. JarjouraK GagnonG NiebergL Caries risk after interproximal enamel reduction Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006 130 26 30 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.02416849068 Search in Google Scholar

18 Kanoupakis P, Peneva M, Moutaftchiev V. Qualitative evaluation of changes in vivo after interproximal enamel reduction. OHDM 2011;10:158–67. KanoupakisP PenevaM MoutaftchievV Qualitative evaluation of changes in vivo after interproximal enamel reduction OHDM 2011 10 158 67 Search in Google Scholar

19 Zachrisson BU, Minster L, Ogaard B, Birkhed B. Dental health assessed after interproximal enamel reduction: caries risk in posterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:90–8. ZachrissonBU MinsterL OgaardB BirkhedB Dental health assessed after interproximal enamel reduction: caries risk in posterior teeth Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011 139 90 8 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.09.00221195282 Search in Google Scholar

20 Zachrisson BU, Nyoygaard L, Mobarak K. Dental health assessed more than 10 years after interproximal enamel reduction of mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:162–9. ZachrissonBU NyoygaardL MobarakK Dental health assessed more than 10 years after interproximal enamel reduction of mandibular anterior teeth Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007 131 162 9 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.00117276856 Search in Google Scholar

21 Arman A, Cehreli SB, Ozel E, Arhun N, Cetinsahin A, Soyman M. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel after various stripping methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:131 e7–14. ArmanA CehreliSB OzelE ArhunN CetinsahinA SoymanM Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel after various stripping methods Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006 130 131 e7 14 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.02116905055 Search in Google Scholar

22 Crain G, Sheridan JJ. Susceptibility to caries and periodontal disease after posterior air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod 1990;24:84–5. CrainG SheridanJJ Susceptibility to caries and periodontal disease after posterior air-rotor stripping J Clin Orthod 1990 24 84 5 Search in Google Scholar

23 Betteridge MA. The effects of interdental stripping on the labial segments evaluated one year out of retention. Br J Orthod 1981;8:193–7. BetteridgeMA The effects of interdental stripping on the labial segments evaluated one year out of retention Br J Orthod 1981 8 193 7 10.1179/bjo.8.4.1936945132 Search in Google Scholar

24 Blandy MC. Assessment of the accuracy of interproximal tooth reduction using three-dimensional digital models. 2015. BlandyMC Assessment of the accuracy of interproximal tooth reduction using three-dimensional digital models 2015 Search in Google Scholar

25 De Felice ME, Nucci L, Fiori A, Flores-Mir C, Perillo L, Grassia V. Accuracy of interproximal enamel reduction during clear aligner treatment. Prog Orthod 2020;21:28. De FeliceME NucciL FioriA Flores-MirC PerilloL GrassiaV Accuracy of interproximal enamel reduction during clear aligner treatment Prog Orthod 2020 21 28 10.1186/s40510-020-00329-1738505132719906 Search in Google Scholar

26 Weir T, Shailendran A, Kerr B, Freer E. Quantitative assessment of interproximal tooth reduction performed as part of Invisalign^® treatment in 10 orthodontic practices. Aust Orthod J 2021;37:176–86, doi: 10.21307/aoj-2021-019. WeirT ShailendranA KerrB FreerE Quantitative assessment of interproximal tooth reduction performed as part of Invisalign^® treatment in 10 orthodontic practices Aust Orthod J 2021 37 176 86 10.21307/aoj-2021-019 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

27 Laganà G, Malara A, Lione R, Danesi C, Meuli S, Cozza P. Enamel interproximal reduction during treatment with clear aligners: digital planning versus OrthoCAD analysis. BMC Oral Health 21:1992021. LaganàG MalaraA LioneR DanesiC MeuliS CozzaP Enamel interproximal reduction during treatment with clear aligners: digital planning versus OrthoCAD analysis BMC Oral Health 21 1992021 10.1186/s12903-021-01487-2805658333874922 Search in Google Scholar

28 Grunheid T, Loh C, Larson BE. How accurate is Invisalign in nonextraction cases? Are predicted tooth positions achieved? Angle Orthod 2017;87:809–15. GrunheidT LohC LarsonBE How accurate is Invisalign in nonextraction cases? Are predicted tooth positions achieved? Angle Orthod 2017 87 809 15 10.2319/022717-147.1831755528686090 Search in Google Scholar

29 Charalampakis O, Iliadi A, Ueno H, Oliver DR, Kim KB. Accuracy of clear aligners: A retrospective study of patients who needed refinement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;154:47–54. CharalampakisO IliadiA UenoH OliverDR KimKB Accuracy of clear aligners: A retrospective study of patients who needed refinement Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018 154 47 54 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.02829957318 Search in Google Scholar

30 Haouili N, Kravitz ND, Vaid NR, Ferguson DJ, Makki L. Has Invisalign improved? A prospective follow-up study on the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020;158:420–5. HaouiliN KravitzND VaidNR FergusonDJ MakkiL Has Invisalign improved? A prospective follow-up study on the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020 158 420 5 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.12.01532620479 Search in Google Scholar

31 Kailasam V, Rangarajan H, Easwaran H, Muthub M. Proximal enamel thickness of the permanent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2021;160:793–804. KailasamV RangarajanH EaswaranH MuthubM Proximal enamel thickness of the permanent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2021 160 793 804 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.05.00734420845 Search in Google Scholar

32 Freeman JE, Maskeroni AJ, Lorton L. Frequency of Bolton tooth size discrepancies among orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:24–7. FreemanJE MaskeroniAJ LortonL Frequency of Bolton tooth size discrepancies among orthodontic patients Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996 110 24 7 10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70083-5 Search in Google Scholar

33 Santoro M, Ayoub ME, Pardi VA, Cangialosi TJ. Mesiodistal crown dimensions and tooth-size discrepancy of the permanent dentition of Dominican Americans. Angle Orthod 2000;70:303–7. SantoroM AyoubME PardiVA CangialosiTJ Mesiodistal crown dimensions and tooth-size discrepancy of the permanent dentition of Dominican Americans Angle Orthod 2000 70 303 7 Search in Google Scholar

34 Araujo E, Souki M. Bolton anterior tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Angle Orthod 2003;73:307–13. AraujoE SoukiM Bolton anterior tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups Angle Orthod 2003 73 307 13 Search in Google Scholar

35 Huanca L. How much can we trust the ClinCheck. Presentation to the European Aligner Society Meeting October 2021. HuancaL How much can we trust the ClinCheck Presentation to the European Aligner Society Meeting October 2021 Search in Google Scholar