This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Kuswandari S, Nishino M. Mixed dentition space analysis for Indonesian Javanese children. Pediatr Dent J 2006;16:74–83.KuswandariSNishinoM. Mixed dentition space analysis for Indonesian Javanese children. Pediatr Dent J2006;16:74–83.10.1016/S0917-2394(06)70068-4Search in Google Scholar
Alther ER, Koroluk LD, Phillips C. Influence of sex and ethnic tooth-size differences on mixed-dentition space analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:332–339.AltherERKorolukLDPhillipsC. Influence of sex and ethnic tooth-size differences on mixed-dentition space analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2007;132:332–339.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.043Search in Google Scholar
Sillman J. Dimensional changes of the dental arches: a longitudinal study from birth to 25 years. Am J Orthod 1964;50:824–842.SillmanJ. Dimensional changes of the dental arches: a longitudinal study from birth to 25 years. Am J Orthod1964;50:824–842.10.1016/0002-9416(64)90040-5Search in Google Scholar
Lee-Chan S, Jacobson BN, Chwa KH, Jacobson RS. Mixed dentition analysis for Asian-Americans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:293–299.Lee-ChanSJacobsonBNChwaKHJacobsonRS. Mixed dentition analysis for Asian-Americans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1998;113:293–299.10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70300-2Search in Google Scholar
Moyer RE. Handbook of Orthodontics., 4th ed. Chicago: Mosby-year book medical publisher; 1958:577.MoyerRE. Handbook of Orthodontics., 4th ed. Chicago: Mosby-year book medical publisher; 1958:577.Search in Google Scholar
Tanaka MM, Johnston LE. The prediction of the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary orthodontic population. J Am Dent Assoc 1974;88:798–801.TanakaMMJohnstonLE. The prediction of the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary orthodontic population. J Am Dent Assoc1974;88:798–801.10.14219/jada.archive.1974.0158Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Staley RN. Mixed-dentition mandibular arch length analysis: a step-by-step approach using the revised Hixon-Oldfather prediction method. Am J Orthod 1984;86:130–135.BisharaSEStaleyRN. Mixed-dentition mandibular arch length analysis: a step-by-step approach using the revised Hixon-Oldfather prediction method. Am J Orthod1984;86:130–135.10.1016/0002-9416(84)90304-XSearch in Google Scholar
Schirmer UR, Wiltshire WA. Orthodontic probability tables for black patients of African descent: mixed dentition analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:545–551.SchirmerURWiltshireWA. Orthodontic probability tables for black patients of African descent: mixed dentition analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1997;112:545–551.10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70082-9Search in Google Scholar
Bernabe E, Flores-Mir C. Are the lower incisors the best predictors for the unerupted canine and premolars sums ? an analysis of a Peruvian sample. Angle Orthod 2005;75:202–207.BernabeEFlores-MirC. Are the lower incisors the best predictors for the unerupted canine and premolars sums ? an analysis of a Peruvian sample. Angle Orthod2005;75:202–207.Search in Google Scholar
Lima Martinelli F, Martinelli de Lima E, Rocha R, Tirre-Araujo MS. Prediction of lower permanent canine and premolars width by correlation methods. Angle Orthod 2005;75:805–808.Lima MartinelliFMartinelli de LimaERochaRTirre-AraujoMS. Prediction of lower permanent canine and premolars width by correlation methods. Angle Orthod2005;75:805–808.Search in Google Scholar
Staley RN, O’Gorman TW, Hoag JF, Shelly TH. Prediction of the widths of unerupted canines and premolars. J Am Dent Assoc 1984;108:185–190.StaleyRNO’GormanTWHoagJFShellyTH. Prediction of the widths of unerupted canines and premolars. J Am Dent Assoc1984;108:185–190.10.14219/jada.archive.1984.0436Search in Google Scholar
Staley RN, Kerber PE. A revision of the Hixon and Oldfather mixed-dentition prediction method. Am J Orthod 1980;78:296–302.StaleyRNKerberPE. A revision of the Hixon and Oldfather mixed-dentition prediction method. Am J Orthod1980;78:296–302.10.1016/0002-9416(80)90274-2Search in Google Scholar
Hixon EH, Old Fther RE. Estimation of the sizes of unerupted cuspid and bicuspid teeth. Angle Orthod 1958;28:236–240.HixonEHOld FtherRE. Estimation of the sizes of unerupted cuspid and bicuspid teeth. Angle Orthod1958;28:236–240.Search in Google Scholar
de Paula S, Almeida MA, Lee PC. Prediction of mesiodistal diameter of unerupted lower canines and premolars using 45 degrees cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:309–314.de PaulaSAlmeidaMALeePC. Prediction of mesiodistal diameter of unerupted lower canines and premolars using 45 degrees cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1995;107:309–314.10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70147-8Search in Google Scholar
Diagne F, Diop-Ba K, Ngom PI, Mbow K. Mixed dentition analysis in a Senegalese population: elaboration of prediction tables. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:178–183.DiagneFDiop-BaKNgomPIMbowK. Mixed dentition analysis in a Senegalese population: elaboration of prediction tables. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2003;124:178–183.10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00390-1Search in Google Scholar
Al-Bitar ZB, Al-Omari IK, Sonbol HN, Al-Ahmad HT, Hamdan AM. Mixed dentition analysis in a Jordanian population. Angle Orthod 2008;78:670–675.Al-BitarZBAl-OmariIKSonbolHNAl-AhmadHTHamdanAM. Mixed dentition analysis in a Jordanian population. Angle Orthod2008;78:670–675.10.2319/0003-3219(2008)078[0670:MDAIAJ]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar
Nourallah AW, Gesch D, Khordaji MN, Splieth C. New regression equations for predicting the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary population. Angle Orthod 2002;72:216–221.NourallahAWGeschDKhordajiMNSpliethC. New regression equations for predicting the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary population. Angle Orthod2002;72:216–221.Search in Google Scholar
Bailit HL. Dental variation among populations. An anthropologic view. Dental Clinics of North America 1975;19:125.BailitHL. Dental variation among populations. An anthropologic view. Dental Clinics of North America1975;19:125.10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00661-9Search in Google Scholar
Jaroontham J, Godfrey K. Mixed dentition space analysis in a Thai population. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:127–134.JaroonthamJGodfreyK. Mixed dentition space analysis in a Thai population. Eur J Orthod2000;22:127–134.10.1093/ejo/22.2.127Search in Google Scholar
Legovic M, Novosel A, Legovic A. Regression equations for determining mesiodistal crown diameters of canines and premolars. Angle Orthod 2003;73:314–318.LegovicMNovoselALegovicA. Regression equations for determining mesiodistal crown diameters of canines and premolars. Angle Orthod2003;73:314–318.Search in Google Scholar
Frankel HH, Benz EM. Mixed dentition analysis for black Americans. Pediatr Dent 1986;8:226–230.FrankelHHBenzEM. Mixed dentition analysis for black Americans. Pediatr Dent1986;8:226–230.Search in Google Scholar
Rheude B, Lionel SP, Ferriera A, Jacobson A. An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod 2005;75:300–304.RheudeBLionelSPFerrieraAJacobsonA. An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod2005;75:300–304.Search in Google Scholar
Naidu D, Scott J, Ong D, Ho Christopher TC. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for Bolton analyses. Aust Orthod J 2009;25:97–103.NaiduDScottJOngDHo ChristopherTC. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for Bolton analyses. Aust Orthod J2009;25:97–103.Search in Google Scholar
Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:101–105.SantoroMGalkinSTeredesaiMNicolayOFCangialosiTJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2003;124:101–105.10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00152-5Search in Google Scholar
Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:794–803.StevensDRFlores-MirCNebbeBRaboudDWHeoGMajorPW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2006;129:794–803.10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.023Search in Google Scholar
Garino F, Garino G. Comparison of dental arch measurements between stone and digital casts. World J Orthod 2002;3:250–254.GarinoFGarinoG. Comparison of dental arch measurements between stone and digital casts. World J Orthod2002;3:250–254.Search in Google Scholar
Zilberman O, Huggare J, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 2003;73:301–306.ZilbermanOHuggareJParikakisKA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod2003;73:301–306.Search in Google Scholar
Abizadeh N, Moles DR, O’Neill J, Noar JH. Digital versus plaster study models: How accurate and reproducible are they? J Orthod 2012;39:151–159.AbizadehNMolesDRO’NeillJNoarJH. Digital versus plaster study models: How accurate and reproducible are they?J Orthod2012;39:151–159.10.1179/1465312512Z.00000000023Search in Google Scholar
Krieger E, Seiferth J, Saric I, Jung BA, Wehrbein H. Accuracy of invisalign® treatments in the anterior tooth region. J Orofac Orthop 2011;72:141–149.KriegerESeiferthJSaricIJungBAWehrbeinH. Accuracy of invisalign® treatments in the anterior tooth region. J Orofac Orthop2011;72:141–149.10.1007/s00056-011-0017-4Search in Google Scholar
Grünheid T, Patel N, De Felippe NL, Wey A, Gaillard PR, Larson BE. Accuracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency of dental measurements using different technologies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:157–164.GrünheidTPatelNDe FelippeNLWeyAGaillardPRLarsonBE. Accuracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency of dental measurements using different technologies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2014;145:157–164.10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.10.012Search in Google Scholar
Luu NS, Mandich MA, Tieu LD, Kaipatur N, Flores-Mir C. The validity and reliability of mixed-dentition analysis methods: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:1143–1153.LuuNSMandichMATieuLDKaipaturNFlores-MirC. The validity and reliability of mixed-dentition analysis methods: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc2011;142:1143–1153.10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0083Search in Google Scholar
Santos IRMD, Noronha WP. Examination of Tanaka & Johnston’s prediction regarding mesiodistal measurements of unerupted canines and premolars. RGO. Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online) 2013;61:55–60.SantosIRMDNoronhaWP. Examination of Tanaka & Johnston’s prediction regarding mesiodistal measurements of unerupted canines and premolars. RGO. Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online)2013;61:55–60.Search in Google Scholar
Tayyab M, Hussain U, Ayub A. Applicability of Tanaka and Johnston mixed dentition analysis in a Peshawar sample. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal 2014;34:322–325.TayyabMHussainUAyubA. Applicability of Tanaka and Johnston mixed dentition analysis in a Peshawar sample. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal2014;34:322–325.Search in Google Scholar
Dhakal J, Shrestha RM, Shrestha S. Applicability of Tanaka & Johnston Analysis and Prediction of New Equation for Contemporary Nepalese Sample. Orthod J Nepal 2013;3:14–18.DhakalJShresthaRMShresthaS. Applicability of Tanaka & Johnston Analysis and Prediction of New Equation for Contemporary Nepalese Sample. Orthod J Nepal2013;3:14–18.10.3126/ojn.v3i1.9269Search in Google Scholar
Pardede DAD, Budiardjo SB, Rizal MF. Applicability of Tanaka-Johnston mixed-dentition analysis in Indonesian children. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research 2017;10:486–489.PardedeDADBudiardjoSBRizalMF. Applicability of Tanaka-Johnston mixed-dentition analysis in Indonesian children. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research2017;10:486–489.Search in Google Scholar
Thimmegowda U, Divyashree, Niwlikar KB, Khare V, Prabhakar AC. Applicability of Tanaka Johnston Method and Prediction of Mesiodistal Width of Canines and Premolars in Children. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:Zc16–zc19.ThimmegowdaUDivyashreeNiwlikarKBKhareVPrabhakarAC. Applicability of Tanaka Johnston Method and Prediction of Mesiodistal Width of Canines and Premolars in Children. J Clin Diagn Res2017;11:Zc16–zc19.10.7860/JCDR/2017/25962.9995Search in Google Scholar
Arslan SG, Dildeş N, Kama JD, Gen C. Mixed-dentition analysis in a Turkish population. World J Orthod 2009;10:135–140.ArslanSGDildeşNKamaJDGenC. Mixed-dentition analysis in a Turkish population. World J Orthod2009;10:135–140.Search in Google Scholar
Carey C. Linear arch dimension and tooth size: An evaluation of the bone and dental structures in cases involving the possible reduction of dental units in treatment. Am J Orthod 1949;35:762–775.CareyC. Linear arch dimension and tooth size: An evaluation of the bone and dental structures in cases involving the possible reduction of dental units in treatment. Am J Orthod1949;35:762–775.10.1016/0002-9416(49)90148-7Search in Google Scholar
Moyers RE Moyers RE. Analysis of dentition and occlusion. Handbook of orthodontics, 4th ed. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1988.MoyersREMoyersRE. Analysis of dentition and occlusion. Handbook of orthodontics, 4th ed.Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1988.Search in Google Scholar
Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Abdallah EM, Garcia AF. Comparisons of mesiodistal and buccolingual crown dimensions of the permanent teeth in three populations from Egypt, Mexico, and the United States. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:416–422.BisharaSEJakobsenJRAbdallahEMGarciaAF. Comparisons of mesiodistal and buccolingual crown dimensions of the permanent teeth in three populations from Egypt, Mexico, and the United States. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1989;96:416–422.10.1016/0889-5406(89)90326-0Search in Google Scholar
Yuen KK, Tang EL, So LL. Mixed dentition analysis for Hong Kong Chinese. Angle Orthod 1998;68:21–28.YuenKKTangELSoLL. Mixed dentition analysis for Hong Kong Chinese. Angle Orthod1998;68:21–28.Search in Google Scholar
Mahmoud BK, Abu Asab SHI, Taib H. Accuracy of four tooth size prediction methods on Malay population. International Scholarly Research Notices 2012;2012:1–4.MahmoudBKAbu AsabSHITaibH. Accuracy of four tooth size prediction methods on Malay population. International Scholarly Research Notices2012;2012:1–4.Search in Google Scholar
