This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Janson G, Branco NC, Fernandes TMF, Sathler R, Garib D, Lauris JRP. Influence of orthodontic treatment, midline position, buccal corridor and smile arc on smile attractiveness: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 2011;81:153–61.JansonGBrancoNCFernandesTMFSathlerRGaribDLaurisJRP. Influence of orthodontic treatment, midline position, buccal corridor and smile arc on smile attractiveness: a systematic review. Angle Orthod2011;81:153–61.10.2319/040710-195.1892635920936969Search in Google Scholar
Sabri R. The eight components of a balanced smile. J Clin Orthod 2005;39:155–67.SabriR. The eight components of a balanced smile. J Clin Orthod2005;39:155–67.Search in Google Scholar
Van der Geld P, Oosterveld P, Heck GV, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Smile attractiveness: self-perception and influence on personality. Angle Orthod 2007;77:759–75.Van der GeldPOosterveldPHeckGVKuijpers-JagtmanAM. Smile attractiveness: self-perception and influence on personality. Angle Orthod2007;77:759–75.10.2319/082606-34917685777Search in Google Scholar
Flores-Mir C, Silva E, Barriga MI, Lagravere MO, Major PW. Layperson’s perception of smile aesthetics and facial views. J Orthod 2004;31:204–9.Flores-MirCSilvaEBarrigaMILagravereMOMajorPW. Layperson’s perception of smile aesthetics and facial views. J Orthod2004;31:204–9.10.1179/14653120422502241615489364Search in Google Scholar
Roden-Johnson D, Gallerano R, English J. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:343–50.Roden-JohnsonDGalleranoREnglishJ. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2005;127:343–50.10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.01315775949Search in Google Scholar
Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:141–51.KokichVOKokichVGKiyakHA. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2006;130:141–51.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.01716905057Search in Google Scholar
Pinho S, Ciriaco C, Faber J, Lenza MA. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:748–53.PinhoSCiriacoCFaberJLenzaMA. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2007;132:748–53.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.03918068592Search in Google Scholar
Ioi H, Kang S, Shimomura T, Kim SS, Park SB, Son WS, et al. Effects of buccal corridors on smile esthetics in Japanese and Korean orthodontists and orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:459–65.IoiHKangSShimomuraTKimSSParkSBSonWSet al.Effects of buccal corridors on smile esthetics in Japanese and Korean orthodontists and orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2012;142:459–65.10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.05.01122999668Search in Google Scholar
Olivares A, Vicente A, Jacobo C, Molina SM, Rodrı´guez A, Bravo LA. Canting of the occlusal plane: perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013;18:516–20.OlivaresAVicenteAJacoboCMolinaSMRodrı´guezABravoLA. Canting of the occlusal plane: perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal2013;18:516–20.10.4317/medoral.18335366888223524412Search in Google Scholar
Al Taki A, Hamdan AM, Mustafa Z, Hassan M, Abu-Alhuda S. Smile esthetics: impact of variations in the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the maxillary lateral incisors. Eur J Dent 2017;11:514–20.Al TakiAHamdanAMMustafaZHassanMAbu-AlhudaS. Smile esthetics: impact of variations in the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the maxillary lateral incisors. Eur J Dent2017;11:514–20.10.4103/ejd.ejd_351_16572773929279680Search in Google Scholar
Sriphadungporn C, Chamnannidiadha N. Perception of smile esthetics by laypeople of different ages. Prog Orthod 2017;18:8.SriphadungpornCChamnannidiadhaN. Perception of smile esthetics by laypeople of different ages. Prog Orthod2017;18:8.10.1186/s40510-017-0162-4535761828317085Search in Google Scholar
Nomura S, Freitas KMS, Silva PPCD, Valarelli FP, Cançado RH, Freitas MRD. Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics. Dental Press J Orthod 2018;23:47–57.NomuraSFreitasKMSSilvaPPCDValarelliFPCançadoRHFreitasMRD. Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics. Dental Press J Orthod2018;23:47–57.10.1590/2177-6709.23.5.047-057.oar626631630427493Search in Google Scholar
Mollabashi V, Abolvardi M, Akhlaghian M, Ghaffari MI. Smile attractiveness perception regarding buccal corridor size among different facial types. Dent Med Probl 2018;55:305–12.MollabashiVAbolvardiMAkhlaghianMGhaffariMI. Smile attractiveness perception regarding buccal corridor size among different facial types. Dent Med Probl2018;55:305–12.10.17219/dmp/9263430328309Search in Google Scholar
Cavalcanti SM, Guerra SMG, Valentim FB, Rosetti EP. Esthetic perception of smiles with different gingival conditions. Gen Dent 2019;67:66–70.CavalcantiSMGuerraSMGValentimFBRosettiEP. Esthetic perception of smiles with different gingival conditions. Gen Dent2019;67:66–70.Search in Google Scholar
Kokich VO, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:311–24.KokichVOKiyakHAShapiroPA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent1999;11:311–24.10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00414.x10825866Search in Google Scholar
Krishnan V, Daniel ST, Lazar D, Asok A. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:515–23.KrishnanVDanielSTLazarDAsokA. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2008;133:515–23.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.04618405815Search in Google Scholar
Ferreira JB, Silva LED, Caetano MTDO, Motta AFJD, Cury-Saramago ADA, Mucha JN. Perception of midline deviations in smile esthetics by laypersons. Dental Press J Orthod 2016;21:51–7.FerreiraJBSilvaLEDCaetanoMTDOMottaAFJDCury-SaramagoADAMuchaJN. Perception of midline deviations in smile esthetics by laypersons. Dental Press J Orthod2016;21:51–7.10.1590/2177-6709.21.6.051-057.oar527893328125140Search in Google Scholar
Ong E, Brown RA, Richmond S. Peer assessment of dental attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006;130:163–9.OngEBrownRARichmondS. Peer assessment of dental attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop2006;130:163–9.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.01816905059Search in Google Scholar
Abu Alhaija ES, Al-Shamsi NO, Al-Khateeb S. Perceptions of Jordanian laypersons and dental professionals to altered smile aesthetics. Eur J Orthod 2010;33:450–6.Abu AlhaijaESAl-ShamsiNOAl-KhateebS. Perceptions of Jordanian laypersons and dental professionals to altered smile aesthetics. Eur J Orthod2010;33:450–6.10.1093/ejo/cjq10021041837Search in Google Scholar
Chotimah C, Utomo SH, Purbiati M. Differences between male and female adolescents in the smile aesthetics perceptions regarding smile arc, gingival display, and buccal corridor. J Int Dent Med Res 2017;10:481–5.ChotimahCUtomoSHPurbiatiM. Differences between male and female adolescents in the smile aesthetics perceptions regarding smile arc, gingival display, and buccal corridor. J Int Dent Med Res2017;10:481–5.Search in Google Scholar
Thiruvenkatachari B, Javidi H, Griffiths SE, Shah AA, Sandler J. Extraction of maxillary canines: esthetic perceptions of patient smiles among dental professionals and laypeople. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;152:509–15.ThiruvenkatachariBJavidiHGriffithsSEShahAASandlerJ. Extraction of maxillary canines: esthetic perceptions of patient smiles among dental professionals and laypeople. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2017;152:509–15.10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.02.01528962736Search in Google Scholar
Duchowski AT. A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2002;34:455–70.DuchowskiAT. A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput2002;34:455–70.10.3758/BF0319547512564550Search in Google Scholar
Hickman L, Firestone A, Beck FM, Speer S. Eye fixations when viewing faces. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:40–6.HickmanLFirestoneABeckFMSpeerS. Eye fixations when viewing faces. J Am Dent Assoc2010;141:40–6.10.14219/jada.archive.2010.001920045820Search in Google Scholar
Richards M, Fields HW, Beck FM, Firestone A, Walther D, Rosenstiel S. Contribution of malocclusion and female facial attractiveness to smile esthetics evaluated by eye tracking. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;147:472–82.RichardsMFieldsHWBeckFMFirestoneAWaltherDRosenstielS. Contribution of malocclusion and female facial attractiveness to smile esthetics evaluated by eye tracking. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2015;147:472–82.10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.12.01625836007Search in Google Scholar
Johnson EK, Fields HW, Beck FM, Firestone AR, Rosenstiel SF. Role of facial attractiveness in patients with slight-to-borderline treatment need according to the Aesthetic Component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need as judged by eye tracking. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;151:297–310.JohnsonEKFieldsHWBeckFMFirestoneARRosenstielSF. Role of facial attractiveness in patients with slight-to-borderline treatment need according to the Aesthetic Component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need as judged by eye tracking. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2017;151:297–310.10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.03728153159Search in Google Scholar
Baker RS, Fields HW, Beck FM, Firestone AR, Rosenstiel SF. Objective assessment of the contribution of dental esthetics and facial attractiveness in men via eye tracking. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:523–33.BakerRSFieldsHWBeckFMFirestoneARRosenstielSF. Objective assessment of the contribution of dental esthetics and facial attractiveness in men via eye tracking. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2018;153:523–33.10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.01629602344Search in Google Scholar
Wang X, Cai B, Cao Y, Zhou C, Yang L, Runzhong L. Objective method for evaluating orthodontic treatment from the lay perspective: an eye tracking study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;150:601–10.WangXCaiBCaoYZhouCYangLRunzhongL. Objective method for evaluating orthodontic treatment from the lay perspective: an eye tracking study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2016;150:601–10.10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.03.02827692417Search in Google Scholar
Kim SH, Hwang S, Hong YJ, Kim JJ, Kim KH, Chung CJ. Visual attention during the evaluation of facial attractiveness is influenced by facial angles and smile. Angle Orthod 2018;88:329–37.KimSHHwangSHongYJKimJJKimKHChungCJ. Visual attention during the evaluation of facial attractiveness is influenced by facial angles and smile. Angle Orthod2018;88:329–37.10.2319/080717-528.1828832229376732Search in Google Scholar
Ker AJ, Chan R, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Esthetics and smile characteristics from the layperson’s perspective: a computer-based survey study. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:1318–27.KerAJChanRFieldsHWBeckMRosenstielS. Esthetics and smile characteristics from the layperson’s perspective: a computer-based survey study. J Am Dent Assoc2008;139:1318–27.10.14219/jada.archive.2008.004318832267Search in Google Scholar
Springer NC, Chang C, Fields HW, Beck FM, Firestone AR, Rosenstiel S, et al. Smile esthetics from the layperson’s perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:91–101.SpringerNCChangCFieldsHWBeckFMFirestoneARRosenstielSet al.Smile esthetics from the layperson’s perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2011;139:91–101.10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.01921195262Search in Google Scholar
Beyer JW, Lindauer SJ. Evaluation of dental midline position. Semin Orthod 1998;4:146–52.BeyerJWLindauerSJ. Evaluation of dental midline position. Semin Orthod1998;4:146–52.10.1016/S1073-8746(98)80016-9Search in Google Scholar
Silva BP, Jimenez-Castellanos E, Martinez-de-Fuentes R, Greenberg JR, Chu S. Laypersons’ perception of facial and dental asymmetries. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 2013;33:163–171.SilvaBPJimenez-CastellanosEMartinez-de-FuentesRGreenbergJRChuS. Laypersons’ perception of facial and dental asymmetries. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent2013;33:163–171.10.11607/prd.161824116371Search in Google Scholar
Williams RP, Rinchuse DJ, Zullo TG. Perceptions of midline deviations among different facial types. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:249–55.WilliamsRPRinchuseDJZulloTG. Perceptions of midline deviations among different facial types. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2014;145:249–55.10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.03424485740Search in Google Scholar
