[1. Burkhardt DR, McNamara JA Jr, Baccetti T. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:108-16.10.1067/mod.2003.7]Search in Google Scholar
[2. DeVincenzo JP. Changes in mandibular length before, during, and after successful orthopedic correction of Class II malocclusions, using a functional appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;99:241-57.10.1016/0889-5406(91)70006-I]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Hägg U, Du X, Rabie AB. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:477-85.10.1067/mod.2002.128218]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Hansen K, Pancherz H. Long-term effects of Herbst treatment in relation to normal growth development: a cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:285-95.10.1093/ejo/14.4.285]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Hansen K, Pancherz H, Hägg U. Long-term effects of the Herbst appliance in relation to the treatment growth period: a cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod 1991;13:471-81.10.1093/ejo/13.6.471]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance – its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod 1985;87:1-20.10.1016/0002-9416(85)90169-1]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Pancherz H, Hensen K. Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Eur J Orthod 1986;8:215-28.10.1093/ejo/8.4.215]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Wieslander L. Long-term effect of treatment with the headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Stability or relapse? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:319-29.10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81328-9]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Pancherz H, Ruf S, Kohlhas P. “Effective condylar growth” and chin position changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic long-term study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:437-46.10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70190-8]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Pancherz H. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Swed Dent J Suppl 1982;15:189-96.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M. The headgear effect of the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric long-term study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:510-20.10.1016/0889-5406(93)70090-B]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Pancherz H, Michailidou C. Temporomandibular joint growth changes in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent Herbst subjects. A long-term roentgenographic cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:153-61.10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.07.015]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Lai M. Molar distalization with the Herbst appliance. Semin Orthod 2000;6:119-28.10.1053/od.2000.5898]Search in Google Scholar
[14. VanLaecken R, Martin CA, Dischinger T, Razmus T, Ngan P. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:582-93.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.01.030]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Wieslander L. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod 1984;86:1-13.10.1016/0002-9416(84)90271-9]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Ruf S, Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction during Herbst therapy in relation to the vertical jaw base relationship: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Angle Orthod 1997;67:271-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Hägg U. Change in mandibular growth direction by means of a Herbst appliance? A case report. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:456-63.10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81193-X]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Schiavoni R, Grenga V, Macri V. Treatment of Class II high angle malocclusions with the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:393-409.10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81186-2]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod 2002;72:316-23.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Nanda RS, Ghosh J. Longitudinal growth changes in the sagittal relationship of the maxilla and mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:79-90.10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70159-1]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Sherman SL, Woods M, Nanda RS, Currier GF. The longitudinal effects of growth on the Wits appraisal. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;93:429-36.10.1016/0889-5406(88)90103-5]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Tadic N, Woods MG. Incisal and soft tissue effects of maxillary premolar extraction in Class II treatment. Angle Orthod 2007;77:808-16.10.2319/081706-33617685775]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Woods M. Lower incisor changes on basal bone and in relation to the lower face: combined growth and treatment effects in the late mixed-dentition. Aust Orthod J 2002;18:7-18.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Woods MG. Sagittal mandibular changes with overbite correction in subjects with different mandibular growth directions: late mixed-dentition treatment effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:388-94.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.03.03718331938]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Vincent AM, West VC. Cephalometric landmark identification error. Aust Orthod J 1987;10:98-104.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Hägglund P, Segerdal S, Forsberg CM. The integrated Herbst appliance – treatment effects in a group of adolescent males with Class II malocclusions compared with growth changes in an untreated control group. Eur J Orthod 2008;30:120-7.10.1093/ejo/cjm102]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Pancherz H. A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:125-34.10.1016/0002-9416(84)90004-6]Search in Google Scholar
[28. McNamara JA Jr, Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:134-44.10.1016/0889-5406(90)70007-Y]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Pancherz H. The nature of Class II relapse after Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:220-33.10.1016/0889-5406(91)70059-6]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Pancherz H. The effects, limitations, and long-term dentofacial adaptations to treatment with the Herbst appliance. Semin Orthod 1997;3:232-43.10.1016/S1073-8746(97)80056-4]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR. Longitudinal changes in three normal facial types. Am J Orthod 1985;88:466-502.10.1016/S0002-9416(85)80046-4]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Ricketts RM. The influence of orthodontic treatment on facial growth and development. Angle Orthod 1960;30:103-33.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Schudy FF. Vertical growth versus anteroposterior growth as related to function and treatment. Angle Orthod 1964;34:75-93.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Tweed CH. The diagnostic facial triangle in the control of treatment objectives. Am J Orthod 1969;55:651-7.10.1016/0002-9416(69)90041-4]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:335-40.10.1067/mod.2000.10700910982936]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Gu Y, McNamara JA Jr. Mandibular growth changes and cervical vertebral maturation. A cephalometric implant study. Angle Orthod 2007;77:947-53.10.2319/071006-284.118004911]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Chan H, Woods MG, Stella D. Mandibular muscle morphology in children with different vertical facial patterns: A 3-dimensional computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:10.e1-13.10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.01318174063]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Valant JR, Sinclair PM. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95:138-47.10.1016/0889-5406(89)90392-2]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Pancherz H, Hägg U. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod 1985;88:273-87.10.1016/0002-9416(85)90126-5]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Malmgren O, Omblus J, Hägg U, Pancherz H. Treatment with an orthopedic appliance system in relation to treatment intensity and growth periods. A study of initial effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91:143-51.10.1016/0889-5406(87)90472-0]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Bell WH, Creekmore TD, Alexander RG. Surgical correction of the long face syndrome. Am J Orthod 1977;71:40-67.10.1016/0002-9416(77)90176-2]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Mojdehi M, Buschang PH, English JD, Wolford LM. Postsurgical growth changes in the mandible of adolescents with vertical maxillary excess growth pattern. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:106-16.10.1067/mod.2001.11211511174555]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Woods MG, Swift JQ, Markowitz NR. Clinical implications of advances in orthognathic surgery. J Clin Orthod 1989;23:420-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Woods MG, Wiesenfeld D. A practical approach to presurgical orthodontic preparation. J Clin Orthod 1998:32:350-8.]Search in Google Scholar