[1. Proffit WR. Contemporary orthodontics. 5th edn. St. Louis, Mo: Elsevier/Mosby, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL Jr, Vig KW, Huang G. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Rischen RJ, Breuning KH, Bronkhorst EM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Records needed for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e74186.10.1371/journal.pone.0074186]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Cobourne MT, DiBiase AT. Handbook of orthodontics. 2nd edn. Edinburgh, UK;New York, NY: Elsevier, 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Kuyl MH, Verbeeck RM, Dermaut LR. The integumental profile: A reflection of the underlying skeletal configuration? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:597-604.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Staudt CB, Kiliaridis S. A nonradiographic approach to detect Class III skeletal discrepancies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:52-8.10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.025]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Durão AR, Alqerban A, Ferreira AP, Jacobs R. Influence of lateral cephalometric radiography in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod 2015;85:206-10.10.2319/011214-41.1863187725191839]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Isaacson KG TA, Atack NE, Horner K, Whaites E , Jones M. Orthodontic radiographs: guidelines for the use of radiographs in clinical orthodontics. 4th edn. London, UK: British Orthodontic Society, 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Horner K, Rusthon V, Walker A, Tsiklaskis K, Hirschmann P, van der Stelt P. Radiation Protection: European guidelines on radiation protection in dental radiology. Luxembourg, Belgium: European Comission, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Atchison KA, Luke LS, White SC. An algorithm for ordering pretreatment orthodontic radiographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:29-44.10.1016/0889-5406(92)70012-Y]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Radiation Health Committee. Code of Practice and Safety Guide for Radiation Protection in Dentistry In: Radiation Protection Series. 10th edn. Canberra, Australia: Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, Group C, for the CG. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:698-702.10.1136/bmj.c332]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Atchison KA, Luke LS, White SC. Contribution of pretreatment radiographs to orthodontists’ decision-making. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1991;71:238-45.10.1016/0030-4220(91)90477-T]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Devereux L, Moles D, Cunningham SJ, McKnight M. How important are lateral cephalometric radiographs in orthodontic treatment planning? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:e175-81.10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.09.02121300228]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Durão AR, Alqerban A, Ferreira AP, Jacobs R. Influence of lateral cephalometric radiography in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod 2015;85:206-10.10.2319/011214-41.1]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Nijkamp PG, Habets LL, Aartman IH, Zentner A. The influence of cephalometrics on orthodontic treatment planning. Eur J Orthod 2008;30:630-5.10.1093/ejo/cjn05918981169]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Bruks A, Enberg K, Nordqvist I, Hansson AS, Jansson L, Svenson B. Radiographic examinations as an aid to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Swedish Dent J 1999;23:77-85.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Silling G, Rauch MA, Pentel L, Garfinkel L, Halberstadt G. The significance of cephalometrics in treatment planning. Angle Orthod 1979;49:259-62.]Search in Google Scholar