[
1. Downs WB. The role of cephalometrics in orthodontic case analysis and diagnosis. Am J Orthod 1952;38:162-82.10.1016/0002-9416(52)90106-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 1953;39:729-55.10.1016/0002-9416(53)90082-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Tweed CH. The frankfort-mandibular incisor angle (FMIA) in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognosis. Angle Orthod 1954;24:121-69.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Riedel RA. The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 1952;22:142-5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod 2002;72:316-23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6.Casko JS, Shepherd WB. Dental and skeletal variation within range of normal. Angle Orthod 1984;54:5-17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. St. Louis, Mo.: Mosby Elsevier, 2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Lux CJ, Burden D, Conradt C, Komposch G. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:568-78.10.1093/ejo/cji061
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Huang WJ, Taylor RW, Dasanayake AP. Determining cephalometric norms for Caucasian and African Americans in Birmingham. Angle Orthod 1998;68:503-11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Hurmerinta K, Rahkamo A, Haavikko K. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105:221-7.10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00204.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Tiwari R, Shyagali TR, Gupta A, Joshi R, Tiwari A, Sen P. Predictability and reliability of different anterio-posterior skeletal discrepancy indicators in different age groups - A cephalometric study. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:ZC80-4.10.7860/JCDR/2016/19195.8560
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Walker GF, Kowalski CJ. The distribution of the ANB angle in “normal” individuals. Angle Orthod 1971;41:332-5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Stahl F, Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. Longitudinal growth changes in untreated subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:125-37. doi: 10.1016/j. ajodo.2006.06.028.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Bishara SE. Class II malocclusions: diagnostic and clinical considerations with and without treatment. Semin Orthod 2006;12:11-24.10.1053/j.sodo.2005.10.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Ochoa BK, Nanda RS. Comparison of maxillary and mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:148-59.10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.03.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 2009;41:1149-60.10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Lamparski DG. Skeletal age assessment utilizing cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod 1975;67:458-9.10.1016/0002-9416(75)90038-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Jacobson A. The “Wits” appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod 1975;67:125-38.10.1016/0002-9416(75)90065-2
]Search in Google Scholar
