[
1. Shaw WC, Rees G, Dawe M, Charles CR. The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. Am J of Orthod 1985;87:21-6.10.1016/0002-9416(85)90170-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning – Part II. Am J of Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:395-411.10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81791-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I. Am J of Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:299-312.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Kerosuo H, Hausen H, Laine T, Shaw WC. The influence of incisal malocclusion on the social attractiveness of young adults in Finland. Eur J of Orthod 1995;17:505-12.10.1093/ejo/17.6.505
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Alam M, Dover JS. On beauty: evolution, psychosocial considerations, and surgical enhancement. Arch Dermatol 2001;137:795-807.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Kokich VO Jr, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:311-24.10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00414.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Sarver DM. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120;98-111.10.1067/mod.2001.114301
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Ackerman MB, Ackerman JL. Smile analysis and design in the digital era. J Clin Orthod 2002;36;221-36.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Moore T, Southard KA, Casko JS, Quan F, Southard TE. Buccal corridors and smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:208-13.10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.11.027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: assymetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:141-51.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Pinho S, Ciraco C, Faber J, Lenza MA. Impact of dental assymmetrics on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:748-53.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.039
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Martin JG. Racial ethnocentrism and judgment of beauty. J Soc Psychol 1964;63:59-63.10.1080/00224545.1964.9922213
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Engel G, Spolter BM. Cephalometric and visual norms for a Japanese population. Am J Orthod 1981;80:48-60.10.1016/0002-9416(81)90195-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Lew KK, Ho KK, Beng SB, Ho KH. Soft tissue cephalometric norms in Chinese adults with esthetic facial profiles. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50:1184-9; discussion 1189-90.10.1016/0278-2391(92)90151-O
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Bailey KL, Taylor RW. Mesh diagram cephalometric norms for Americans of African descent. Am J of Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:218-23.10.1053/od.1998.v114.a87104
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Chen C, Chen Y, Li Q, Kau CH. The Esthetic Difference of Chinese Beauty Evaluated by Two Different Human Races Based on Three-Dimensional Average Face Analysis. J Craniofac Surg 2019;30:1435-40.10.1097/SCS.0000000000005316
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Farkas LG, Kolar JC. Anthropometrics and art in the aesthetics of women’s faces. Clin Plast Surg 1987;14:599-616.10.1016/S0094-1298(20)31488-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Smith JD, Thomas PM, Proffit WR. A comparison of current prediction imaging programs. Am J of Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:527-36.10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Karatas OH, Toy E. Three-dimensional imaging techniques: A literature review. Eur J of Dent 2014;8:132-40.10.4103/1305-7456.126269405402624966761
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Zogheib T, Jacobs R, Bornstein MM, Agbaje JO, Anumendem D, Klazen Y et al. Comparison of 3D Scanning versus 2D Photography for the Identification of Facial Soft-Tissue Landmarks. Open Dent J 2018;12:61-71.10.2174/1874210601812010061581494629492171
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Kau CH, Richmond S, Zhurov AI, Knox J, Chestnutt I, Hartles F et al. Reliability of measuring facial morphology with a 3-dimensional laser scanning system. Am J of Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:424-30.10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.06.03716214622
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Kovacs L, Zimmermann A, Brockmann G, Baurecht H, Schwenzer-Zimmerer K, Papadopulos NA et al. Accuracy and precision of the three-dimensional assessment of the facial surface using a 3-D laser scanner. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25:742-54.10.1109/TMI.2006.87362416768239
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Ma L, Xu T, Lin J. Validation of the three-dimensional facial scanning system based on structured light techniques. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2009;94:290-8.10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.01.01019303659
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Gupta R, Cheung AC, Bartling S, Lisauskas J, Grasruck M, Leidecker C et al. Flat-panel volunite CT: fundamental principles, technology, and applications. Radiographics 2008;28:2009-22.10.1148/rg.28708500419001655
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Patel A, Bhavra GS, O’Neill JR. MRI Scanning and orthodontics. J Orthod 2006;33:246-9.10.1179/14653120522502172617142330
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Tai K, Park JH, Hayashi K, Yanagi Y, Asaumi JI, Iida S et al. Preliminary study evaluating the accuracy of MRI imagines of CBCT images in the field of orthodontics. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2011;36:211-8.10.17796/jcpd.36.2.r7853hp57404541422524087
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Ozsoy U, Sekerci R, Ogut E. Effect of sitting, standing and supine body positions on facial soft tissue: details 3D analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;44:1309-16.10.1016/j.ijom.2015.06.00526116065
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Fourie Z, Damstr J, Gerrits PO, Yen Y. Accuracy and repeatability of anthropometric facial measurements using cone beam computer tomography. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2011;48:623-30.10.1597/10-07620849272
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Hayashi T. Application of ultrasonography in dentistry. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2012;48:5-13.10.1016/j.jdsr.2011.05.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Kau CH, Richmond S, Incrapera A, English J, Xia JJ. Threedimensional surface acquisition systems for the study of facial morphology and their application to maxillofacial surgery. Int J Med Robot 2007;3:97-110.10.1002/rcs.14117619242
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Claes P, Liberton DK, Daniels K, Rosana KM, Quillen EE, Pearsoon LN et al. Modeling 3D facial shape from DNA. PLoS Genet 2014;10:e1004224.10.1371/journal.pgen.1004224396119124651127
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Straker LM, Hall GL, Mountain J, Howie EK, White E, McArdle N et al. Rationale, design and methods for the 22 year follow-up on the Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort (Raine) Study. BMB Public Health 2015:15:663.10.1186/s12889-015-1944-6450105426169918
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Straker L, Mountain J, Jacques A, White S, Smith A, Landau L et al. Cohort Profile: The Western Australia Pregnancy Cohort (Raine) Study-Generation 2. Int J Epidemiol 2017;46:1384-5j.10.1093/ije/dyw308583760828064197
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Subtelny JD. A longitudinal study of soft tissue facial structures and their profile characteristics, defined in relation to underlying skeletal structures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1959;45:481-507.10.1016/0002-9416(59)90014-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Legan HL, Burstone CJ. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1980;38:744-51.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Satravaha S, Schlegel KD. The significance of the integumentary profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987:92:422-6.10.1016/0889-5406(87)90263-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Godt A, Müller A, Kalwitzki M, Göz G. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:648-53.10.1093/ejo/cjm07317878186
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Moore T, Southard KA, Casko JS, Qian F, Southard TE. Buccal corridors and smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005:127:208-13.10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.11.02715750540
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Naini FB, Gill DS. Facial aesthetics: 2. Clinical assessment. Dent Update 2008:35:159-62, 164-6, 169-70.10.12968/denu.2008.35.3.15918507224
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Paysan P, Knothe R, Amberg B, Romdhani S, Vetter T. A 3D Face Model for Pose and Illumination Invariant Face Recognition. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal based Surveillance (AVSS) for Security, Safety and Monitoring in Smart Environments 2009.10.1109/AVSS.2009.58
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Rhodes G, Tremewan T. Averageness, Exaggeration and Facial Attractiveness. Psychol Sci 1996;7:105-10.10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00338.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Trujillo LT, Jankowitsch JM, Langlois JH. Beauty is in the ease of the beholding: a neurophysiological test of the averageness theory of facial attractiveness. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2014;14:1061-76.10.3758/s13415-013-0230-2405351224326966
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Khosravanifard B, Rakhshan B, Raeesi E. Factors influencing attractiveness of soft tissue profile. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013;115:29-37.10.1016/j.oooo.2012.03.02122858016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Hatch CD, Wehby GL, Nidey NL, Moreno Uribe LM. Effects of Objective 3-dimensional measures of Facial Shape and Symmetry on Perceptions of Facial Attractiveness. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75:1958-70.10.1016/j.joms.2017.04.042563014428577372
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Türkkahraman H, Gökalp H. Facial profile preferences among various layers of Turkish population. Angle Orthod 2004;74:640-7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Johnston DJ, Hunt O, Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Stevenson M, Hepper P. The Influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:349-54.10.1093/ejo/cji023
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Abu Arqoub SH, Al-Khateeb SN. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:103-11.10.1093/ejo/cjq028
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Mantzikos T. Esthetic soft tissue profile preferences among the Japanese population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998:114:1-7.10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70230-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Soh J, Chew MT, Wong HB. An Asian community’s perspective on facial profile attractiveness. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007;35:18-24.10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00304.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Ioi H, Nakata S, Nakasima A, Counts A. Influence of facial convexity on facial attractiveness in Japanese. Orthod Craniofac Res 2007;10:181-6.10.1111/j.1601-6343.2007.00382.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Meyer-Marcotty P, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Bareis U, Hartmann J, Kochel J. Three-dimensional perception of facial asymmetry. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:647-53.10.1093/ejo/cjq146
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Perrett DI, May KA, Yoshikawa S. Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature 1994;368:239-42.10.1038/368239a0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. Burke PH, Banks P, Beard LF, Tee JE, Hughes C. Stereophotographic measurement of change in facial soft tissue morphology following surgery. Br J of Oral Surgery 1983;21:237-45.10.1016/0007-117X(83)90012-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. Angle Orthod 1991;61:43-8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. Bergman RT. Cephalometric soft tissue facial analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:373-89.10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70222-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
56. Halazonetis DJ. Morphometric evaluation of soft tissue profile shape. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:481-9.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.06.03117418714
]Search in Google Scholar
[
57. Ioi H, Yasutomi S, Nakata S, Nakisima A, Counts AL. Effect of lower facial vertical proportion on facial attractiveness in Japanese. Orthodontic Waves 2006;65:161-5.10.1016/j.odw.2006.11.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
58. Shafiee R, Korn El, Pearson H, Boyd RL, Baumrind S. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:500-8.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.04818405813
]Search in Google Scholar
[
59. Schabel BJ, Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Subjective vs objective evaluations of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:S72-9.10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.04019362269
]Search in Google Scholar
[
60. Naini FB, Donaldson AN, Cobourne MT, McDonald F. Assessing the influence of mandibular prominence on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:738-46.10.1093/ejo/cjr09821846874
]Search in Google Scholar
[
61. Zhu S, Jayaraman J, Khambay B. Evaluation of facial appearance in patients with cleft lip and palate by laypeople and professionals: a systematic literature review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2016;53:187-96.10.1597/14-17725650654
]Search in Google Scholar
[
62. Todd SA, Hammond P, Hutton T, Cochrane S, Cunningham S. Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:363-9.10.1093/ejo/cji02415961568
]Search in Google Scholar
[
63. Cochrane SM, Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1999;14:291-5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
64. Lum V, Goonewardene MS, Islam SMS, Peter Eastwood P. Characterisation of Facial Convexity in Adults using 3D Surface Imaging. Research Dissertation DClin Dent, The UniversiAust Orthod J (in press).
]Search in Google Scholar