Non-replication of an association between the Odd-skipped related 1 c.654G>A (rs12329305) polymorphism and kidney volume in newborns

1. Brenner BM, Garcia DL, Anderson S. Glomeruli and blood pressure. Less of one, more the other? Am J Hypertens 1988;1:335-47.10.1093/ajh/1.4.335Search in Google Scholar

2. Amann K, Plank C, Dötsch J. Low nephron number – a new cardiovascular risk factor in children? Pediatr Nephrol 2004;19(12):1319-23. doi: 10.1007/s00467-004-1643-5.10.1007/s00467-004-1643-5Search in Google Scholar

3. Luyckx VA, Brenner BM. The clinical importance of nephron mass. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;21(6):898-910. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009121248.10.1681/ASN.2009121248Search in Google Scholar

4. Cain JE, Di Giovanni V, Smeeton J, Rosenblum ND. Genetics of renal hypoplasia: insights into the mechanisms controlling nephron endowment. Pediatr Res 2010;68(2):91-8. doi: 10.1203/00006450-201011001-00175.10.1203/00006450-201011001-00175Search in Google Scholar

5. Quinlan J, Lemire M, Hudson T, Qu H, Benjamin A, Roy A, et al. A common variant of the PAX2 gene is associated with reduced newborn kidney size. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;18(6):1915-21. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006101107.10.1681/ASN.2006101107Search in Google Scholar

6. Zhang Z, Iglesias D, Eliopoulos N, El Kares R, Chu L, Romagnani P, et al. A variant OSR1 allele which disturbs OSR1 mRNA expression in renal progenitor cells is associated with reduction of newborn kidney size and function. Hum Mol Genet 2011;20(21):4167-74. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr341.10.1093/hmg/ddr341Search in Google Scholar

7. Kaczmarczyk M, Goracy I, Loniewska B, Kuprjanowicz A, Binczak-Kuleta A, Clark JS, et al. Association of BMPR1A polymorphism, but not BMP4, with kidney size in full-term newborns. Pediatr Nephrol 2013;28(3):433-8. doi: 10.1007/s00467-012-2277-7.10.1007/s00467-012-2277-7Search in Google Scholar

8. Hinchliffe SA, Sargent PH, Howard CV, Chan YF, van Velzen D. Human intrauterine renal growth expressed in absolute number of glomeruli assessed by the disector method and Cavalieri principle. Lab Invest 1991;64(6):777-84.Search in Google Scholar

9. So PL, Danielian PS. Cloning and expression analysis of a mouse gene related to Drosophila odd-skipped. Mech Dev 1999;84:157-60.10.1016/S0925-4773(99)00058-1Search in Google Scholar

10. Wang Q, Lan Y, Cho ES, Maltby KM, Jiang R. Odd-skipped related 1 (Odd 1) is an essential regulator of heart and urogenital development. Dev Biol 2005;288(2):582-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.09.024.10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.09.024386908916223478Search in Google Scholar

11. Mugford JW, Sipilä P, McMahon JA, McMahon AP. Osr1 expression demarcates a multi-potent population of intermediate mesoderm that undergoes progressive restriction to an Osr1-dependent nephron progenitor compartment within the mammalian kidney. Dev Biol 2008;324(1):88-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.09.010.10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.09.010264288418835385Search in Google Scholar

12. James RG, Kamei CN, Wang Q, Jiang R, Schultheiss TM. Odd-skipped related 1 is required for development of the metanephric kidney and regulates formation and differentiation of kidney precursor cells. Development 2006;133(15):2995-3004. doi: 10.1242/dev.02442.10.1242/dev.0244216790474Search in Google Scholar

13. Katoh M. Molecular cloning and characterization of OSR1 on human chromosome 2p24. Int J Mol Med 2002;10(2):221-5.10.3892/ijmm.10.2.221Search in Google Scholar

14. Lozić B, Krželj V, Kuzmić-Prusac I, Kuzmanić-Šamija R, Čapkun V, Lasan R, et al. The OSR1 rs12329305 polymorphism contributes to the development of congenital malformations in cases of stillborn/neonatal death. Med Sci Monit 2014;20:1531-8. doi: 10.12659/MSM.890916.10.12659/MSM.890916415634025164089Search in Google Scholar

15. Mosteller RD. Simplified calculation of body-surface area. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1098. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198710223171717.10.1056/NEJM1987102231717173657876Search in Google Scholar

16. Kaczmarczyk M, Łoniewska B, Kuprjanowicz A, Bińczak-Kuleta A, Gorący I, Ryder M, et al. Association between RET (rs1800860) and GFRA1 (rs45568534, rs8192663, rs181595401, rs7090693, and rs2694770) variants and kidney size in healthy newborns. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2016;20(10):624-8. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2016.0079.10.1089/gtmb.2016.007927533506Search in Google Scholar

17. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992(1);112:155-9.10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155Search in Google Scholar

18. Kolonko A, Chudek J, Wiecek A. Nephron underdosing as a risk factor for impaired early kidney graft function and increased graft loss during the long-term follow-up period. Transplant Proc 2013;45(4):1639-43. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.12.019.10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.12.01923726638Search in Google Scholar

19. Bertram JF, Douglas-Denton RN, Diouf B, Hughson MD, Hoy WE. Human nephron number: Implications for health and disease. Pediatr Nephrol 2011;26(9):1529-33. doi: 10.1007/s00467-011-1843-8.10.1007/s00467-011-1843-821604189Search in Google Scholar

20. Hirschhorn JN, Lohmueller K, Byrne E, Hirschhorn K. A comprehensive review of genetic association studies. Genet Med 2002;4(2):45-61.10.1097/00125817-200203000-0000211882781Search in Google Scholar

21. Moonesinghe R, Khoury MJ, Liu T, Ioannidis JPA. Required sample size and nonreplicability thresholds for heterogeneous genetic associations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105(2):617-22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705554105.10.1073/pnas.0705554105220658518174335Search in Google Scholar

22. Li A, Meyre D. Challenges in reproducibility of genetic association studies: lessons learned from the obesity field. Int J Obes 2012;37(4):559-67. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.82.10.1038/ijo.2012.8222584455Search in Google Scholar

23. Deng HW, Chen WM, Recker RR. Population admixture: Detection by Hardy-Weinberg test and its quantitative effects on linkage-disequilibrium methods for localizing genes underlying complex traits. Genetics 2001;157(2):885-97.10.1093/genetics/157.2.885146154011157005Search in Google Scholar

24. Nelis M, Esko T, Mägi R, Zimprich F, Zimprich A, Toncheva D, et al. Genetic structure of Europeans: A view from the North-East. PLoS One 2009;4:e5472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005472.10.1371/journal.pone.0005472267505419424496Search in Google Scholar

25. Ioannidis JP. Why most discovered true associations are inflated. Epidemiology 2008;19(5):640-8. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818131e7.10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818131e718633328Search in Google Scholar

26. Gorroochurn P, Hodge SE, Heiman GA, Durner M, Greenberg DA. Non-replication of association studies: “pseudo-failures” to replicate? Genet Med 2007;9(6):325-31. doi: 10.1097GIM.0b013e3180676d79.10.1097/GIM.0b013e3180676d79Search in Google Scholar

27. Posavac EJ. Using p values to estimate the probability of a statistically significant replication. Underst Stat 2002;1(2):101-12. doi: 10.1207/S15328031US0102_03.10.1207/S15328031US0102_03Search in Google Scholar

28. Killeen PR. An alternative to null-hypothesis significance tests. Psychol Sci 2005;16(5):345-53. 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01538.x.10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01538.x147302715869691Search in Google Scholar

29. Macdonald RR. On determining replication probabilities: Comments on Posavac (2002). Underst Stat 2003;2(1):69-70. doi: 10.1207/S15328031US0201_04.10.1207/S15328031US0201_04Search in Google Scholar

30. Maraun M, Gabriel S. Killeen’s (2005) p rep coefficient: Logical and mathematical problems. Psychol Methods 2010;15(2):182-91. doi: 10.1037/a0016955.10.1037/a001695520515239Search in Google Scholar

31. Iverson GJ, Lee MD, Wagenmakers EJ. P(rep) misestimates the probability of replication. Psychon Bull Rev 2009;16(2):424-9. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.424.10.3758/PBR.16.2.42419293117Search in Google Scholar

32. Miller J, Schwarz W. Aggregate and individual replication probability within an explicit model of the research process. Psychol Methods 2011;16(3):337-60. doi: 10.1037/a0023347.10.1037/a002334721534683Search in Google Scholar

33. Greenwald AG, Gonzalez R, Harris RJ, Guthrie D. Effect sizes and p values: What should be reported and what should be replicated? Psychophysiology 1996;33(2):175-83.Search in Google Scholar

34. Mackay TF. Epistasis and quantitative traits: using model organisms to study gene-gene interactions. Nat Rev Genet 2014;15(1):22-33. doi: 10.1038/nrg3627.10.1038/nrg3627391843124296533Search in Google Scholar

35. Carlborg O, Haley CS. Epistasis: Too often neglected in complex trait studies? Nat Rev Genet 2004;5(8):618-25. doi: 10.1038/nrg1407.10.1038/nrg140715266344Search in Google Scholar

36. Ioannidis JP, Patsopoulos NA, Evangelou E. Heterogeneity in meta-analyses of genome-wide association investigations. PLoS One 2007;2(9):e841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000841.10.1371/journal.pone.0000841195079017786212Search in Google Scholar

37. Moreau C, Lefebvre JF, Jomphe M, Bhérer C, Ruiz-Linares A, Vézina H, et al. Native American admixture in the Quebec founder population. PLoS One 2013;8(6):e65507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065507.10.1371/journal.pone.0065507368039623776491Search in Google Scholar

38. Schmidt IM, Main KM, Damgaard IN, Mau C, Haavisto AM, Chellakooty M, et al. Kidney growth in 717 healthy children aged 0–18 months: A longitudinal cohort study. Pediatr Nephrol 2004;19(9):992-1003. doi: 10.1007/s00467-004-1479-z.10.1007/s00467-004-1479-z15206038Search in Google Scholar

39. Ahn Y, Garruto RM. Estimations of body surface area in newborns. Acta Paediatr 2008;97(3):366-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00666.x.10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00666.x18298786Search in Google Scholar