[
d’Alessandro, B., O’Neil, C., & LaGatta, T. (2017). Conscientious classification: A data scientist’s guide to discrimination—Aware classification. Big Data, 5(2), 120–134.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baer, T. (2019). Understand, manage, and prevent algorithmic bias: A guide for business users and data scientists. Apress.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barocas, S., & Boyd, D. (2017), Computing ethics. Engaging the ethics of data science in practice. Seeking more common ground between data scientists and their critics. Communications of the ACM, 60(11), 23–25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baumgartner, J., Glatzer, E., Rumler, F., & Stiglbauer, A. (2005) How frequently do consumer prices change in Austria? Evidence from micro CPI data. Working Paper, 101. Oesterreichische National Bank, Vienna, Austria.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bils, M., & Klenov, P. J. (2004). Some evidence on the importance of sticky prices. Journal of Political Economy, 112, 947–985.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christen, T., Hess, M., Grichnik, D., & Wincent, J. (2022). Value-based pricing in digital platforms: A machine learning approach to signaling beyond core product attributes in cross-platform settings. Journal of Business Research, 152, 82–92.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coenen, G., Levin, A. T., & Christoffel, K. (2007). Identifying the influences of nominal and real rigidities in aggregate price-setting behavior. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, 2439–2466.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 37–52.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dutta, S., Zbaracki, M. J., & Bergen, M. (2003). Pricing process as a capability: A resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(7), 615–630.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Friedman, J. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189–1232.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Füreder, R., Maier, Y., & Yaramova, A. (2014). Value-based pricing in Austrian medium-sized companies. Strategic Management, 19(4), 13–19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Giffen, van, B., Herhausen, D., & Fahse, T. (2022). Overcoming the pitfalls and perils of algorithms: A classification of machine learning biases and mitigation methods. Journal of Business Research, 144, 93–106.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hinterhuber, A. (2008). Customer value-based pricing strategies: Why companies resist. Journal of Business Strategy, 29(4), 41–50.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hinterhuber, A., Liozu, S. M. (2018). Thoughts: Premium pricing in B2C and B2B. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 17(4), 301–305.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hinterhuber, A., Snelgrove, T. C., & Stensson, B. I. (2021). Value first, then price: The new paradigm of B2B buying and selling. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 20(1), 403–409.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jedidi, K., & Jagpal, S. (2009). Willingness to pay: Measurement and managerial implications. In V. R. Rao (Ed.), Handbook of pricing research in marketing (pp. 37–60). Edward Elgar.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kamishima, T., Akaho, S., Asoh, H., & Sakuma, J. (2012, September 24-28). Fairness-aware classifier with prejudice remover regularizer. European Conference, ECML PKDD: Machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases. Bristol. United Kingdom.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kienzler, M. (2023). Value-based pricing and cognitive biases: An overview for business markets. Industrial Marketing Management (in press).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Korinek, A. (2023). Language models and cognitive automation for economic research. NBER Working Paper, 30957. Mimeo.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liozu, S. M., & Hinterhuber, A. (2013). Pricing orientation, pricing capabilities, and firm performance. Management Decision, 51(3), 594–614.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lünemann, P., & Mathä, T. Y. (2005). Nominal rigidities and inflation persistence in Luxembourg: A comparison with EU15 member countries with particular focus on services and regulated prices. Working Paper, 14. Luxembourg.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mora Cortez, R., & Hidalgo, P. (2022). Prioritizing B2B marketing capabilities: Crossvergence in advanced and emerging economies. Industrial Marketing Management, 105, 422–438.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Möller, K., & Anttila, M. (1987). Marketing capability—A key success factor in small business? Journal of Marketing Management, 3(2), 185–203.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raja, J. Z., Frandsen, T., Kowalkowski, C., & Jarmatz, M. (2020). Learning to discover value: Value-based pricing and selling capabilities for services and solutions. Journal of Business Research, 114, 142–159.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steinbrenner, F. (2020). Emerging supplementary trends to value-based pricing—A future outlook. International Journal of Management, Technology and Engineering, 10(11), 50–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steinbrenner, F., & Turčínková, J. (2021). The value-based pricing determination matrix for pricing method selection. Central European Business Review, 10(4), 99–123.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Töytäri, P., Rajala, R., & Brashear Alejandro, T. (2015). Organizational and institutional barriers to value-based pricing in industrial relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 53–64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vorhies, D. W., Harker, M., & Rao, C. P. (1999). The capabilities and performance advantages of market-driven firms. European Journal of Marketing, 33(11), 1171–1202.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Winston, W. L., Nestler, S., & Pelechrinis, K. (2022). Mathletics. How gamblers, managers, and fans use mathematics in sports (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 139–153.
]Search in Google Scholar
| 26. Juli 2023