[
Andersson, G. B. (1991). Epidemiology of spinal disorders. In J. Frymoyer (Ed.), The adult spine: Principles and practice (pp. 107-146). New York, NY: Raven Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baggott, J. (2015). Origins: The scientific story of creation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berk, R. A., and Freedman, D. A. (2003). Statistical assumptions as empirical commitments. In T. G. Blomberg and S. Cohen (Eds). Law, punishment, and social control: Essays in honor of Sheldon Messinger (2nd Ed, pp. 235-254). Aldine de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boos, N., Rieder, R., Schade, V., Spratt, K. F., Semmer, N., and Aebi, M. (1995). The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, work perception, and psychosocial factors in identifying symptomatic disc herniations. Spine, 20, 2613-2625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199512150-0000210.1097/00007632-199512150-00002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borenstein, D. G., Wiesel, D. G., and Boden, S. D. (1995). Low back pain-medical diagnosis and comprehensive management (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Box, G. E. P., and Draper, N. R. (1987). Empirical model-building and response surfaces. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bradley, M. T., and Brand, A. (2016). Significance testing needs a taxonomy: Or how the Fisher, Neyman-Pearson controversy resulted in the inferential tail wagging the measurement dog. Psychological Reports, 119(2), 487-504. doi: 10.1177/003329411666265910.1177/0033294116662659
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Briggs, W. (2016). Uncertainty: The soul of modeling, probability and statistics. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-39756-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Briggs, W. (2019). Everything wrong with p-values under one roof. In V. Kreinovich, N. N. Thach, N. D. Trung, and D. Van Thanh (Eds.), Beyond traditional probabilistic methods in econometrics (pp. 22-44). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p <.05). American Psychologist, 49(12), 997-1003. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.99710.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cohen, J. (1997). The earth is round (p < .05). In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, and J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 21-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frymoyer, J. W. (1988). Epidemiology. In J. W. Frymoyer, and S. L. Gordon (Eds.), New perspectives on low back pain (pp. 19-33) (Symposium, Workshop, Airlie). Chicago, IL: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gillies, D. (2000). Philosophical theories of probability. London: Taylor and Francis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Godfrey-Smith P. (2003). Theory and reality: An introduction to the philosophy of science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226300610.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greenland, S. (2017). Invited commentary: The need for cognitive science in methodology. American Journal of Epidemiology, 186, 639-645. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx25910.1093/aje/kwx259
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grice, J. W. (2017). Comment on Locascio’s results blind manuscript evaluation proposal. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(5), 254-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2017.135250510.1080/01973533.2017.1352505
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halsey, L. G., Curran-Everett, D., Vowler, S. L., and Drummond, G. B. (2015). The fickle P value generates irreproducible results. Nature Methods, 12, 179-185. doi:10.1038/nmeth.328810.1038/nmeth.3288
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hubbard, R. (2016). Corrupt research: The case for reconceptualizing empirical management and social science. Los Angeles, California: Sage Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyman, M. (2017). Can ‘results blind manuscript evaluation’ assuage ‘publication bias’? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(5), 247-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2017.135058110.1080/01973533.2017.1350581
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jensen, M. C., Brant-Zawadzki, M. N., Obuchowski, N., Modic, M. T., Malkasian, D., and Ross, J. S. (1994). Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. New England Journal of Medicine, 331, 69-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM19940714331020110.1056/NEJM199407143310201
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lawrence, R. C., Feseon, D. T., Helmick, C. G., Arnold, L. M., Choi, H., Deyo, R. A., … Wolfe, F. (2008). Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States Part II. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 58, 26-35.10.1002/art.23176
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, H., Trafimow, D., Wang, T., Wang, C., and Hu, L. (2020). User-friendly computer programs so econometricians can run the a priori procedure. Frontiers in Management and Business, 1(1), 2-6. doi: 10.25082/FMB.2020.01.00210.25082/FMB.2020.01.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kline, R. (2017). Comment on Locascio, results blind science publishing. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(5), 256-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2017.135530810.1080/01973533.2017.1355308
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621123
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Locascio, J. (2017a). Results blind publishing. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 39(5), 239-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2017.133609310.1080/01973533.2017.1336093
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Locascio, J. (2017b). Rejoinder to responses to “results blind publishing.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 39(5), 258-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2017.135630510.1080/01973533.2017.1356305
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marks, M. J. (2017). Commentary on Locascio 2017. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 39(5), 252--253. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2017.135058010.1080/01973533.2017.1350580
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McShane, B. B., Gal, D., Gelman, A., Robert, C., and Tackett, J. L. (2018). Abandon statistical significance. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.07588.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nickerson, R. S. (2000). Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychological Methods, 5(2), 241-301. doi: I0.1037//1082-989X.S.2.24110.1037/1082-989X.5.2.241
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251). doi: 10.1126/science.aac471610.1126/science.aac4716
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Popper, K. R. (1983). Realism and the aim of science. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stigler, S. M. (1990). The history of statistics: The measurement of uncertainty before 1900. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trafimow, D. (2003). Hypothesis testing and theory evaluation at the boundaries: Surprising insights from Bayes’s theorem. Psychological Review, 110(3), 526-535. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.52610.1037/0033-295X.110.3.526
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trafimow, D. (2006). Using epistemic ratios to evaluate hypotheses: An imprecision penalty for imprecise hypotheses. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 431-462. doi: 10.3200/MONO.132.4.431-46210.3200/MONO.132.4.431-462
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trafimow, D. (2019a). A frequentist alternative to significance testing, p-values, and confidence intervals. Econometrics, 7(2), 1-14. https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/7/2/2610.3390/econometrics7020026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trafimow, D. (2019b). A taxonomy of model assumptions on which P is based and implications for added benefit in the sciences. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(6), 571-583. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2019.161059210.1080/13645579.2019.1610592
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trafimow, D. (2020). Our intellectual children: Kuhnian ants or Feyerabendian questioners? Advances in Educational Research and Evaluation, 1(2), 88-92. doi: 10.25082/AERE.2020.02.00510.25082/AERE.2020.02.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trafimow, D., and Marks, M. (2015). Editorial. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(1), 1-2. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01973533.2015.101299110.1080/01973533.2015.1012991
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trafimow, D., and Marks, M. (2016). Editorial. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 38(1), 1-2. doi: 10.1080/01973533.2016.114103010.1080/01973533.2016.1141030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trafimow, D., and Trafimow, J. H. (2016). The shocking implications of Bayes’ theorem for diagnosing herniated nucleus pulposus based on MRI scans. Cogent Medicine, 3: 1133270. doi: 10.1080/2331205X.2015.113327010.1080/2331205X.2015.1133270
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Valentine, J. C., Aloe, A. M., and Lau, T. S. (2015). Life after NHST: How to describe your data without “p-ing” everywhere. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(5), 260-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2015.106024010.1080/01973533.2015.1060240
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wasserstein, R. L., and Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA’s statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2). doi:10.1080/00031305.2016.115410810.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wei, Z., Wang, T., Trafimow, D., and Talordphop, K. (2020). Extending the a priori procedure to normal Bayes models. International Journal of Intelligent Technologies and Applied Statistics, 13(2), 169-183. doi: 10.6148/IJITAS.202006_13(2).0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ziliak, S. T., and McCloskey, D. N. (2016). The cult of statistical significance: How the standard error costs us jobs, justice, and lives. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
]Search in Google Scholar