[Baran, P., and Markowicz, I. (2018). Behavioral economics and rationality of certain economic activities. the case of intra-community supplies. In K. Nermend, M. Łatuszyńska (Ed.), Problems, Methods and Tools in Experimental and Behavioral Economics, Proceedings of Computational Methods in Experimental Economics (CMEE) 2017 Conference (pp. 285-299). Cham: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carrère, C., and Grigoriou, Ch. (2014). Can mirror data help to capture informal international trade? Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Research Study Series, (65).]Search in Google Scholar
[Federico, G., and Tena, A. (1991). On the accuracy of foreign trade statistics (1909-1935). Morgenstern revisited. Explorations in Economic History, 28(3), 259-273.10.1016/0014-4983(91)90007-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferrantino, M. J., and Wang, Z. (2008). Accounting for discrepancies in bilateral trade: The case of China, Hong Kong, and the United States. China Economic Review, 19(3), 502-520.10.1016/j.chieco.2008.02.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Fisman, R., and Wei, S. J. (2004). Tax rates and tax evasion: evidence from ‘missing imports’ in China. Journal of Political Economy, 112(2), 471-496.10.1086/381476]Search in Google Scholar
[Główny Urząd Statystyczny [GUS]. (2018), Handel zagraniczny. Statystyka lustrzana i statystyka asymetrii. Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guo, D. (2010). Mirror Statistics of International Trade in Manufacturing Goods: The Case of China. (UNIDO Research and Statistics Branch Working Paper 19/2009).]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamanaka, S. (2012). Whose trade statistics are correct? Multiple mirror comparison techniques: a test of Cambodia. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 15(1), 33-56.10.1080/17487870.2012.657827]Search in Google Scholar
[Javorcik, B. S., and Narciso, G. (2008). Differentiated products and evasion of import tariffs. Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, 76(2), 208-222.10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.07.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Markowicz, I., Baran, P. (2019a). ICA and ICS-based rankings of EU countries according to quality of mirror data on intra-Community trade in goods in the years 2014-2017. Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(1), 55-68. DOI: 10.24136/oc.2019.00310.24136/oc.2019.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Markowicz, I., and Baran, P. (2019b). Intra-community trade asymmetries based clustering and linear ordering of combined nomenclature chapters using generalized distance measure (GDM). Econometrics. Ekonometria, 23(3), 50-58.10.15611/eada.2019.3.05]Search in Google Scholar
[Markowicz, I., and Baran, P. (2019c). Quality of Intrastat data. Comparison between “old” and “new” EU member states. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 2(341), 69-80, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.341.0510.18778/0208-6018.341.05]Search in Google Scholar
[Morgenstern, O. (1963). On the Accuracy of Economic Observations (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parniczky, G. (1980). On the inconsistency of World Trade statistics. International Statistical Review, 48(1), 43-48.10.2307/1402404]Search in Google Scholar
[Tsigas, M. E., Hertel, T. W., and Binkley, J. K. (1992). Estimates of systematic reporting biases in trade statistics. Economic Systems Research, 4(4), 297-310.10.1080/09535319200000028]Search in Google Scholar
[Zuckermann, S. (1921). Statistischer Atlas zum Welthandel. Vol. 1. Berlin: Otto Elsner Verlags-gesellschaft M.B.H.]Search in Google Scholar