Enlarged cisterna chyli diagnosed with ultrasonography – case report

1. Loukas M, Wartmann CT, Louis RG Jr, Tubbs RS, Salter EG, Gupta AA et al.: Cisterna chyli: a detailed anatomic investigation. Clin Anat 2007; 20: 683–688. Loukas M, Wartmann CT, Louis RG Jr, Tubbs RS, Salter EG, Gupta AA et al.: Cisterna chyli: a detailed anatomic investigation. Clin Anat 2007; 20: 683–688.10.1002/ca.20485Search in Google Scholar

2. Smith TR, Grigoropoulos J: The cisterna chyli: incidence and characteristics on CT. Clin Imaging 2002; 26: 18–22. Smith TR, Grigoropoulos J: The cisterna chyli: incidence and characteristics on CT. Clin Imaging 2002; 26: 18–22.10.1016/S0899-7071(01)00358-8Search in Google Scholar

3. Pinto PS, Sirlin CB, Andrade-Barreto OA, Brown MA, Mindelzun RE, Mattrey RF: Cisterna chyli at routine abdominal MR imaging: a normal anatomic structure in the retrocrural space. Radiographics 2004; 24: 809–817. Pinto PS, Sirlin CB, Andrade-Barreto OA, Brown MA, Mindelzun RE, Mattrey RF: Cisterna chyli at routine abdominal MR imaging: a normal anatomic structure in the retrocrural space. Radiographics 2004; 24: 809–817.10.1148/rg.243035086Search in Google Scholar

4. Tamsel S, Ozbek SS, Sever A, Elmas N, Demirpolat G: Unusually large cisterna chyli: US and MRI findings. Abdom Imaging 2006; 31: 719–721. Tamsel S, Ozbek SS, Sever A, Elmas N, Demirpolat G: Unusually large cisterna chyli: US and MRI findings. Abdom Imaging 2006; 31: 719–721.10.1007/s00261-005-8005-zSearch in Google Scholar

5. Słapa RZ, Kasperlik-Załuska AA, Migda B, Jakubowski WS: Shear wave elastography of adrenal masses is feasible and may help to differentiate between solid and cystic lesions – an initial report. Endokrynol Pol 2014; 65: 119–124. Słapa RZ, Kasperlik-Załuska AA, Migda B, Jakubowski WS: Shear wave elastography of adrenal masses is feasible and may help to differentiate between solid and cystic lesions – an initial report. Endokrynol Pol 2014; 65: 119–124.10.5603/EP.2014.0017Search in Google Scholar

6. Weinberger V, Fischerova D, Semeradova I, Slama J, Cibula D, Zikan M: Ultrasound characteristics of a symptomatic and asymptomatic lymphocele after pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 58: 266–272. Weinberger V, Fischerova D, Semeradova I, Slama J, Cibula D, Zikan M: Ultrasound characteristics of a symptomatic and asymptomatic lymphocele after pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 58: 266–272.10.1016/j.tjog.2019.01.018Search in Google Scholar

7. Testa AC, Gaurilcikas A, Licameli A, Di Stasi C, Lorusso D, Scambia G et al.: Sonographic imaging of urinoma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 490–491. Testa AC, Gaurilcikas A, Licameli A, Di Stasi C, Lorusso D, Scambia G et al.: Sonographic imaging of urinoma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 490–491.10.1002/uog.6349Search in Google Scholar

8. Bennett MK, Jehle D: Ultrasonography in blunt abdominal trauma. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1997; 15: 763–787. Bennett MK, Jehle D: Ultrasonography in blunt abdominal trauma. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1997; 15: 763–787.10.1016/S0733-8627(05)70333-3Search in Google Scholar

9. Bonhomme A, Broeders A, Oyen RH, Stas M, De Wever I, Baert AL: Cystic lymphangioma of the retroperitoneum. Clin Radiol 2001; 56: 156–158. Bonhomme A, Broeders A, Oyen RH, Stas M, De Wever I, Baert AL: Cystic lymphangioma of the retroperitoneum. Clin Radiol 2001; 56: 156–158.10.1053/crad.2000.016211222077Search in Google Scholar

10. Davidson AJ, Hartman DS, Goldman SM: Mature teratoma of the retroperitoneum: radiologic, pathologic, and clinical correlation. Radiology 1989; 172: 421–425. Davidson AJ, Hartman DS, Goldman SM: Mature teratoma of the retroperitoneum: radiologic, pathologic, and clinical correlation. Radiology 1989; 172: 421–425.10.1148/radiology.172.2.26648662664866Search in Google Scholar

11. Li YP, Guico R, Parikh S, Chiu S: Cystic mesothelioma of the retroperitoneum. J Clin Ultrasound 1992; 20: 65–68. Li YP, Guico R, Parikh S, Chiu S: Cystic mesothelioma of the retroperitoneum. J Clin Ultrasound 1992; 20: 65–68.10.1002/jcu.18702001131309547Search in Google Scholar