Usefulness of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of hematoma after primary hip arthroplasty

1.Maradit Kremers H, Larson DR, Crowson CS, Kremers WK, Washington RE, Steiner CA et al.: Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97: 1386–1397.10.2106/JBJS.N.01141455117226333733 Search in Google Scholar

2.Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M: Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 780–785.10.2106/JBJS.F.0022217403800 Search in Google Scholar

3.www.nfz.gov.pl. Search in Google Scholar

4.Zhou XD, Li J, Xiong Y, Jiang LF, Li WJ, Wu LD: Do we really need closed-suction drainage in total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis. Int Orthop 2013; 37: 2109–2118.10.1007/s00264-013-2053-8382490623982636 Search in Google Scholar

5.Kelly EG, Cashman JP, Imran FH, Conroy R, O’Byrne J: Systemic review and meta-analysis of closed suction drainage versus non-drainage in primary hip arthroplasty. Surg Techno Int 2014; 24: 295–301. Search in Google Scholar

6.Ashraf T, Darmanis S, Krikler SJ: Effectiveness of suction drainage after primary or revision total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2001; 24: 1158–1160.10.3928/0147-7447-20011201-1511770094 Search in Google Scholar

7.Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Chen AF: Proceedings of the international consensus meeting on periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B: 1450–1452.10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.3313524151261 Search in Google Scholar

8.Matharu GS, Janardhan S, Brash L, Pynsent PB, Dunlop DJ, James SL: The utility of repeat ultrasound imaging in the follow-up of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2016; 98: 143–149.10.1308/rcsann.2016.0052521049026741659 Search in Google Scholar

9.Muraoka K, Naito M, Nakamura Y, Hagio T, Takano K: Usefulness of ultrasonography for detection of pseudotumors after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30: 879–884.10.1016/j.arth.2014.12.00525540995 Search in Google Scholar

10.Nishii T, Sakai T, Takao M, Yoshikawa H, Sugano N: Is ultrasound screening reliable for adverse local tissue reaction after hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 2014; 29: 2239–2244.10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.03024908625 Search in Google Scholar

11.Hoefnagels EM, Obradov M, Reijnierse M, Anderson PG, Swierstra BA: Sonography after total hip replacement: reproducibility and normal values in 47 clinically uncomplicated cases. Acta Orthop 2007; 78: 81–85.10.1080/1745367061001345717453396 Search in Google Scholar

12.Nestorova1 R, Vlad V, Petranova T, Porta F, Radunovic G, Micu MC et al.: Ultrasonography of the hip. Med Ultrason 2012; 14: 217–224. Search in Google Scholar

13.Molini L, Precerutti M, Gervasio A, Draghi F, Bianchi S: Hip: Anatomy and US technique. J Ultrasound 2011; 14: 99–108.10.1016/j.jus.2011.03.004355807523397030 Search in Google Scholar

14.Kong K, Jeyagopal N, Davies SJ: Should we still stitch the subcutaneous fat layer? A clinical and ultrasound assessment in 50 hip operations. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1993; 75: 23–25. Search in Google Scholar

15.Saleh K, Olson M, Resig S, Bershadsky B, Kuskowski M, Gioe T et al.: Predictors of wound infection in hip and knee joint replacement: results from a 20 year surveillance program. J Orthop Res 2002; 20: 506–515.10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00153-X Search in Google Scholar

16.Eveillard M, Mertl P, Canarelli B, Lavenne J, Fave MH, Eb F et al.: [Risk of deep infections in first intention total hip arthroplasties]. Presse Med 2001; 30:1868–1875. Search in Google Scholar