Modified sonoelastographic scale score for lymph node assessment in lymphoma – a preliminary report

1. Potter P (ed.): Loeb Classic Library: Hippocrates. Vol. VIII, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1995: 108–125. Search in Google Scholar

2. Paget S: The distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast. Lancet 1889; 133: 571–573.10.1016/S0140-6736(00)49915-0 Search in Google Scholar

3. Yen TW, Aardal NP, Bronner MP, Thorning DR, Savard CE, Lee SP et al.: Myofibroblasts are responsible for the desmoplastic reaction surrounding human pancreatic carcinoma. Surgery 2002; 131: 129–134.10.1067/msy.2002.11919211854689 Search in Google Scholar

4. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E: Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010; 60: 277–300.10.3322/caac.2007320610543 Search in Google Scholar

5. Borst M: Die Lehre von den Geschwülsten miteinemmikroskopischen Atlas. Bergmann, Wiesbaden 1902. Search in Google Scholar

6. Ophir J, Céspedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X: Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 1991; 13: 111–134.10.1177/0161734691013002011858217 Search in Google Scholar

7. Young T: A Course of Lectures on Natural Philosophy and the Mechanical Arts. Vol. I: Text, Vol. II: Plates. Joseph Johnson, London 1807: 143–145.10.5962/bhl.title.22458 Search in Google Scholar

8. Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R, Tanaka S, Ito J, Hiraoka M et al.: Cervical lymph node metastases: diagnosis at sonoelastography– initial experience. Radiology 2007; 243: 258–267.10.1148/radiol.243105203217293571 Search in Google Scholar

9. Tan R, Xiao Y, He Q: Ultrasound elastography: its potential role in assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy. AcadRadiol 2010; 17: 849–855.10.1016/j.acra.2010.03.01420540909 Search in Google Scholar

10. Havre RF, Waage JR, Gilja OH, Odegaard S, Nesje LB: Real-time elas- tography: strain ratio measurements are influenced by the position of the reference area. Ultraschall Med 2011: 33: 559–568.10.1055/s-0031-127324721667433 Search in Google Scholar

11. Barr RG, Memo R, Schaub CR: Shear wave ultrasound elastography of the prostate: initial results. Ultrasound Q 2012; 28: 13–20.10.1097/RUQ.0b013e318249f59422357224 Search in Google Scholar

12. Sarvazyan A, Hall TJ, Urban MW, Fatemi M, Aglyamov SR, Garra BS: An overview of elastography– an emerging branch of medical imaging. Curr Med Imaging Rev 2011; 7: 255–282.10.2174/157340511798038684326994722308105 Search in Google Scholar

13. Youk JH, Son EJ, Gweon HM, Kim H, Park YJ, Kim JA: Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, combined with B-mode ultrasonography: qualitative and quantitative assessments. Ultrasound Med Biol 2014; 40: 2336–2344.10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.05.020 Search in Google Scholar

14. Alam F, Naito K, Horiguchi J, Fukuda H, Tachikake T, Ito K: Accuracy of sonographicelastography in the differential diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes: comparison with conventional B-mode sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 604–610.10.2214/AJR.07.3401 Search in Google Scholar

15. Ishibashi N, Yamagata K, Sasaki H, Seto K, Shinya Y, Ito H et al.: Realtime tissue elastography for the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Ultrasound Med Biol 2012; 38: 389–395.10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.12.004 Search in Google Scholar

16. Furukawa MK, Fujita Y, Kubota A, Furukawa M, Hanamura H: Diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma – usefulness of power Doppler ultrasonography and elastog- raphy. Medix 2007; suppl.: 20–23. Search in Google Scholar

17. Dudea SM, Botar-Jid C, Dumitriu D, Vasilescu D, Manole S, Leng- hel ML: Differentiating benign from malignant superficial lymph nodes with sonoelastography. Medical Ultrason 2013; 15: 132–139.10.11152/mu.2013.2066.152.smd1cbj2 Search in Google Scholar

18. Teng DK, Wang H, Lin YQ, Sui GQ, Guo F, Sun LN: Value of ultrasound elastography in assessment of enlarged cervical lymph nodes. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012; 13: 2081–2085.10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.5.2081 Search in Google Scholar

19. Zhi H, Xiao XY, Yang HY, Ou B, Wen YL, Luo BM: Ultrasonic elastogra- phy in breast cancer diagnosis: strain ratio vs 5-point scale. AcadRadiol 2010; 17: 1227–1233.10.1016/j.acra.2010.05.004 Search in Google Scholar

20. Rubesin SE, Furth EE: Other tumors of the colon. In: Gore RM, Levine MS (eds.): Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology. Saunders, Philadelphia 2000: 1049–1074.10.1016/B978-1-4557-5117-4.00060-X Search in Google Scholar

21. Regenbogen VS, Ghahremani GG, Zabrowski RJ, Rochester D: Burkitt’s lymphoma of the stomach. J ComputTomogr 1984; 8: 273–276.10.1016/0149-936X(84)90076-6 Search in Google Scholar

22. Al-Kaabi J, Ahmed S, Rizvi A, Burney I: Non-Hodgkin lymphoma mimicking polymyalgia rheumatica in a young patient. Oman Med J 2008; 23: 189–191. Search in Google Scholar

23. Birgersdotter A, Baumforth KR, Porwit A, Sjöberg J, Wei W, Björk- holm M et al.: Inflammation and tissue repair markers distinguish the nodular sclerosis and mixed cellularity subtypes of classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Br J Cancer 2009; 101: 1393–1401.10.1038/sj.bjc.6605238276844019773754 Search in Google Scholar

24. Birgersdotter A, Baumforth KR, Wei W, Murray PG, Sjöberg J, Björk- holm M et al.: Connective tissue growth factor is expressed in malignant cells of Hodgkin lymphoma but not in other mature B-cell lymphomas. Am J ClinPathol 2010; 133: 271–280.10.1309/AJCPG7H0SSRYKNKH20093237 Search in Google Scholar

25. Som PM: Detection of metastasis in cervical lymph nodes: CT and MR criteria and differential diagnosis. AJR AM J Roentgenol 1992; 158: 961–969.10.2214/ajr.158.5.1566697 Search in Google Scholar

26. Lister TA, Crowther D, Sutcliffe SB, Glatstein E, Canellos G, Young RC et al.: Report of a committee convened to discuss the evaluation and staging of patients with Hodgkin’s disease: Cotswolds meeting. J ClinOncol 1989; 7: 1630–1636.10.1200/JCO.1989.7.11.1630 Search in Google Scholar

27. Murphy SB: Classificaton, staging and end results of treatment in childhood non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: dissimilarities from lymphomas in adults. SeminOncol 1980; 7: 332–339. Search in Google Scholar

28. Murphy SB, Fairclough DL, Hutchison RE, Berard CW: Non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas of childhood: an analysis of the histology, staging, and response to treatment of 338 cases at a single institution. J ClinOncol 1989; 7: 186–193.10.1200/JCO.1989.7.2.186 Search in Google Scholar

29. Rouvière H: Lymphatic System of the Head and Neck. Edwards Brothers, Ann Arbor (MI, USA) 1938. Search in Google Scholar

30. Ferrer R: Lymphadenopathy: differential diagnosis and evaluation. Am Fam Physician 1998; 58: 1313–1320. Search in Google Scholar

31. Westhofen M, Reichel C, Nadjmi D: Die farbloseDuplexsonographie der Halslymphknoten. Otorhinolaryngologica Nova 1994; 4: 285–291.10.1159/000313140 Search in Google Scholar

32. Engert A, Eichenauer DA, Dreyling M; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Hodgkin’s lymphoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2010; 21 (suppl. 5): v168–v171.10.1093/annonc/mdq181 Search in Google Scholar

33. Kudo M, Shiina T, Moriyasu F, Iijima H, Tateishi R, Yada N et al.: JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines: liver. J Med Ultrasonics 2013; 40: 325–357.10.1007/s10396-013-0460-5 Search in Google Scholar

34. Ahuja AT, Ying M: Sonographic evaluation of cervical lymph nodes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 1691–1699.10.2214/ajr.184.5.01841691 Search in Google Scholar

35. Rappaport H, Berard W, Butler JJ, Dorfman RF, Lukes RJ, Thomas LB: Report of the committee on histopathological criteria contributing to staging of Hodgkin’s disease. Cancer Res 1971; 31: 1864–1865. Search in Google Scholar

36. Kansal R, Singleton TP, Ross CW, Finn WG, Padmore RF, Schnitzer B: Follicular Hodgkin lymphoma: a histopathologic study. Am J ClinPathol 2002; 117: 29–35.10.1309/M7YV-V8V2-A5VA-J1Y4 Search in Google Scholar

37. Ying M, Ahuja A, Brook F, Brown B, Metreweli C: Nodal shape (S/L) and its combination with size for assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: which cut-off should be used? Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25: 1169–1175.10.1016/S0301-5629(99)00075-7 Search in Google Scholar

38. van Overhagen H, Brakel K, Heijenbrok MW, van Kasteren JH, van de Moosdijk CN, Roldaan AC et al.: Metastases in supraclavicular lymph nodes in lung cancer: assessment with palpation, US, and CT. Radiology 2004; 232: 75–80.10.1148/radiol.232103066315166326 Search in Google Scholar

39. Bartlett ES, Walters TD, Yu E: Can axial-based nodal size criteria be used in other imaging planes to accurately determine “enlarged” head and neck lymph nodes? ISRN Otolaryngol 2013; 2013: 232968.10.1155/2013/232968374198923984099 Search in Google Scholar

40. Cummings CW: Otolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery. Elsevier Mosby, Philadelphia 2005. Search in Google Scholar

41. Van den Brekel MW, Castelijns JA, Stel HV, Golding RP, Meyer CJ, Snow GB: Modern imagining techniques and ultrasound-guided aspiration cytology for the assessment of neck node metastases: a prospective comparative study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1993; 250: 11–17.10.1007/BF001769418466744 Search in Google Scholar

42. Whitman GJ, Lu TJ, Adejolu M, Krishnamurthy S, Sheppard D: Lymph node sonography. Ultrasound Clin 2011; 6: 369–380.10.1016/j.cult.2011.05.005 Search in Google Scholar

43. Stavros AT: Breast Ultrasound. Lippincott Williams& Wilkins, Philadelphia 2004. Search in Google Scholar

44. Solivetti FM, Elia F, Graceffa D, Di Carlo A: Ultrasound morphology of inguinal lymph nodes may not herald an associated pathology. J ExpClin Cancer Res 2012; 31: 88.10.1186/1756-9966-31-88355166123078807 Search in Google Scholar

45. Habermann TM, Steensma DP: Lymphadenopathy. Mayo ClinProc 2000; 75: 723–732.10.4065/75.7.72310907389 Search in Google Scholar