<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>This article provides an overview of the topic of the pandemic from the perspective of criminal law theory and practice in Germany. First of all, the major criminal offences of bodily injury and murder are discussed in the context of infecting a person with the Coronavirus and the (possible) consequences of having Covid-19, such as risk of death. The dilemmatic situation of triage, <italic>i.e</italic>., allocating limited intensive care resources, is illustrated in relation to the same offences. Then, the more specific crimes that came to the fore in the course of the pandemic are addressed. Subsidy fraud due to the state aids intended to compensate for the financial damage in the marketplace because of pandemic-related measures, and issuance or use of incorrect health certificates for exemption from the obligation to wear a face mask fall within this scope. Finally, the administrative offences law of the German Infection Protection Act was discussed, primarily with regard to regulations that violate the principle of legal certainty.</p>
</abstract>

This article provides an overview of the topic of the pandemic from the perspective of criminal law theory and practice in Germany. First of all, the major criminal offences of bodily injury and murder are discussed in the context of infecting a person with the Coronavirus and the (possible) consequences of having Covid-19, such as risk of death. The dilemmatic situation of triage, i.e., allocating limited intensive care resources, is illustrated in relation to the same offences. Then, the more specific crimes that came to the fore in the course of the pandemic are addressed. Subsidy fraud due to the state aids intended to compensate for the financial damage in the marketplace because of pandemic-related measures, and issuance or use of incorrect health certificates for exemption from the obligation to wear a face mask fall within this scope. Finally, the administrative offences law of the German Infection Protection Act was discussed, primarily with regard to regulations that violate the principle of legal certainty.

The Pandemic and Criminal Law – A Look at Theory and Practice in Germany

Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg

Białostockie Studia Prawnicze

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

{"article-title":"The Pandemic and Criminal Law \u2013 A Look at Theory and Practice in Germany"}

This article provides an overview of the topic of the pandemic from the perspective of criminal law theory and practice in Germany. First of all, the major...

The Pandemic and Criminal Law – A Look at Theory and Practice in Germany

Online veröffentlicht: 30. Dez. 2021

Seitenbereich: 9 - 26

Eingereicht: 30. Juli 2021

Akzeptiert: 08. Okt. 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2021.26.06.01

Schlüsselwörter
Infection Protection Act (IfSG), non-difference of the worth of life, pandemic, SARS-CoV–2, subsidy fraud, triage

© 2020 Henning Lorenz et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The Pandemic and Criminal Law – A Look at Theory and Practice in Germany

Online veröffentlicht: 30. Dez. 2021

Seitenbereich: 9 - 26

Eingereicht: 30. Juli 2021

Akzeptiert: 08. Okt. 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2021.26.06.01

SchlüsselwörterInfection Protection Act (IfSG), non-difference of the worth of life, pandemic, SARS-CoV–2, subsidy fraud, triage

© 2020 Henning Lorenz et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Schlüsselwörter
Infection Protection Act (IfSG), non-difference of the worth of life, pandemic, SARS-CoV–2, subsidy fraud, triage