[ARISTOTLE., 1926. The art of rhetoric. Trans. J. H. Freese. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press/William Heinemann Ltd.10.4159/DLCL.aristotle-art_rhetoric.1926]Search in Google Scholar
[BLAKEMORE, D., 1992. Understanding utterances: An introduction to pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[BROWN, P. and LEVINSON, S., 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085]Search in Google Scholar
[BRUMMETT, B., 2006. Rhetoric in popular culture. 2nd ed. London: Sage]Search in Google Scholar
[BURKE, K., 1950/1992. A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[CICERO., 1949. De inventione (On invention). Trans. H. M. Hubbell. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press/William Heinemann Ltd. 10.4159/DLCL.marcus_tullius_cicero-de_inventione.1949]Search in Google Scholar
[[CICERO]., 1981. Rhetorica ad Herennium. Trans. H. Caplan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press/William Heinemann Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[CHAPMAN, S., 2009. Paul Grice: Philosopher and linguist. London: Palgrave Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[CHAPMAN, S., 2011. Pragmatics. London: Palgrave, Macmillan.10.1007/978-0-230-34519-5]Search in Google Scholar
[CLARK, B., 2013. Relevance theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[CLYNE, M., 1996. Inter-cultural communication at work: Cultural values in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620799]Search in Google Scholar
[CONLEY, T. M., 1990. Rhetoric in the European tradition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[CORBETT, E. P. J. and CONNORS, R. J., 1999. Classical rhetoric for the modern student. 4th ed., Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[CROWLEY, S. and HAWHEE, D., 2012. Ancient rhetorics for contemporary students. 5th ed. London: Pearson Education Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[DASCAL, M. and GROSS, A. G., 1999. The marriage of pragmatics and rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 107-130.10.1353/par.1999.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[DIXON, P., 1971. Rhetoric. London: Methuen and Co Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[EIDENMULLER, M., 2008. Great speeches for better speaking. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill Education.]Search in Google Scholar
[GRICE, P. H., 1975. Logic and conversation. In: P. Cole, J.L. Morgan, eds. Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.10.1163/9789004368811_003]Search in Google Scholar
[GRICE, P. H., 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[GRUNDY, P., 2008. Doing pragmatics. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[HERRICK, J. A., 2005. The history and theory of rhetoric: An introduction. 3rd ed. London: Pearson Education Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[HORN, L. R., 1984. Towards a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In: D. Schiffrin ed. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 11-42.]Search in Google Scholar
[JACKSON, S., and JACOBS, S., 1980. Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 251-265.10.1080/00335638009383524]Search in Google Scholar
[KELLER, S. D., 2010. Combining rhetoric and pragmatics to read Othello. English Studies, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 398-411.10.1080/00138381003647574]Search in Google Scholar
[KENNEDY, G. A., 1994. A new history of classical rhetoric. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[KENNEDY, G. A., 1998. Comparative rhetoric: A historical and cross-cultural introduction. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[LEECH, G., 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[LEVINSON, S., 2000. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[LOCKE, J., 1995. An essay concerning human understanding. London: Prometheus Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[NEMESI, A. L., 2013. Implicature phenomena in classical rhetoric. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 129-151.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.02.004]Search in Google Scholar
[OLMSTED, W., 2006. Rhetoric: An historical introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470776469]Search in Google Scholar
[PERNOT, L., 2005. Rhetoric in antiquity. Trans W. E. Higgins. Washington D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[QUINTILIAN., 1921. Institutio Oratoria. Trans. D. A. Russell. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press/William Heinemann Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[RAMAGE, J. D., 2006. Rhetoric: A user’s guide. London: Pearson Education Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[RICHARDS, I. A., 1965/1936. The philosophy of rhetoric. New York and London: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[RICHARDS, J., 2008. Rhetoric. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203932759]Search in Google Scholar
[SPEDDING, J., ELLIS, R. L. and HEATH, D., D., eds. 2011. The works of Francis Bacon: Vol 3 The philosophical works. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[SPERBER, D. and WILSON, D., 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[WILSON, D, and SPERBER, D., 1981, On Grice’s theory of conversation. In: P. Werth, ed. Conversation and discourse. London: Croom Helm, pp. 155-78.10.4324/9781003291039-11]Search in Google Scholar
[ZIPF, G. K., 1949. Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Oxford: Addison-Wesley Press. ]Search in Google Scholar