[1. Adler, N., 1986. International Dimensions of Organizational Behaviour. Boston: McGraw Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Ashforth, B.E., Gioia, D.A., Robinson, S.L. and Trevino, L.K., 2008. Introduction to special topic forum re-viewing organizational corruption. Academic of Management Review, 33(3), pp.670-684.10.5465/amr.2008.32465714]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Berger, I.E., Cunningham, P. and Drumwright, M.E., 2007. Mainstreaming corporate social responsibility: developing markets for virtue. California Management Review, 4. 49, pp.132-157.10.2307/41166409]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Bibu, N., Nastase, M. and Gligor, D.C., 2010. The perception over Corporate Social Responsibility in Romania. Review of International Comparative Management, 11(5), pp.764-778.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Boons, F. and Ludeke-Freund, F., 2013. Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-theart steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaning Production, 45, pp.p-19.10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Carroll, A., 1991. The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, pp.39-48.10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Certo, S., 2002. Managementul modern. BucureSti: Teora Publishing House.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Cooke, R.A. and Rousseau, D.M., 1988. Behavioural norms and expectations: a quantitative approach to the assessment of organizational culture. Group Organization Studies, 13, pp.245-273.10.1177/105960118801300302]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Doppelt, B., 2003. Leading Change Toward Sustainability. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Dutta, S., Lanvin, B. and Wunsch-Vincent, S., 2016. The Global Innovation Index 2016: Winning with Global Innovation. Available at: <https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/gii-2016-report>. Accesed 9 January 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Earle, H.A., 2003. Building a workplace of choice: Using the work environment to attract and retain top talent. Journal of Facilities Management, 2(3), pp.244-257.10.1108/14725960410808230]Search in Google Scholar
[13. European Commission, 2001. Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility: Green Paper. Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Galbreath, J., 2009. Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Formal Strategic Planning and Firm Culture. British Journal of Management, 21, pp.511-525.10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00633.x]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Gangone, A.D., 2014. Responsabilitate sociala corporatista. Repere conceptuale. Abordari strategice. Particularitaţi culturale. BucureSti: Universitara Publishing House.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Gangone, A.D. and Ganescu, M.C., 2014. Corporate social responsibility in emerging and developing economies in Central and Eastern Europe - a measurement model from the stakeholder theory perspective. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 27(1), pp.539-558.10.1080/1331677X.2014.967535]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Ganescu, C., 2012. Corporate social responsibility, a strategy to create and consolidate sustainable businesses. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 19(11), pp.91-106.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Ganescu, C., 2011. Cultura organizaţionala Si competitivitatea. BucureSti: Universitara Publishing House.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Hemingway, C.A., 2013. Corporate Social Entrepreneurship. Integrity Within. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139017527]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Hillman, A. and Keim, G., 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what´s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), pp.125-139.10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO;2-H]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J. and Minkov, M., 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Revised and Expanded 3rd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Hofstede, G., 1996. Managementul structurilor multiculturale. Software-ul gândirii. BucureSti: Economica Publishing House.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Hsu, A., 2016. 2016 Environmental Performance Index. New Haven: Yale University. [on-line] Available at: <www.epi.yale.edu> [Accesed 15 January 2017].]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Jaakson, K., Vadi, M. and Tamm, K., 2009. Organizational culture and CSR: an exploratory study of Estonian servce organizations. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(1), pp.6-18.10.1108/17471110910939962]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Jones, T.M., Felps, W. and Bigley, G., 2007. Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review, 32, pp.137-155.10.5465/amr.2007.23463924]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Kotter, J.P. and Heskett, J.L., 1992. Corporate culture and performance. New York: Free Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. KPMG International, 2016. 2016 Change Readiness Index. Oxford: Oxford Economics.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Linnenluecke, M.K. and Griffiths, A., 2010. Corporate sustainability and organizational culture. Journal of World Business, 45, pp.357-366.10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.006]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Maas, K.E.H., Boons, F.A.A., 2010. CSR as a strategic activity: value creation, redistribution and integration. In: Louche, C., Idowu, S., Leal Filho, W. (Eds.), Innovative CSR: From Risk Management to Value Creation. Greenleaf, London, pp. 154-172.10.4324/9781351279000-8]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Maignan, I. and Ferrell, O.C., 2004. Corporate social responsibility and marketing: an integrative framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), pp.3-19.10.1177/0092070303258971]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Maon, F., Lindgreen, A. and Swaen, V., 2010. Organizational Stages and Cultural Phases: A Critical Review and a Consolidative Model of Corporate Social Responsibility Development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), pp.20-38.10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00278.x]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Obrad, C., Petcu, D., GhergheS, V. and Suciu, S., 2011. Responsabilitatea sociala a companiilor din România între percepţii Si realitate. Amfiteatru Economic, XIII(29), pp.44-56.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Olaru. M., Stoleriu. G. and Sandru, I.M.D., 2011. Preocupari ale IMM-urilor din România privind responsabilitatea sociala în raport cu criteriile modelului european de excelenţa EFQM. Amfiteatru Economic, XIII (29), pp.57-72.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Schein, E.H., 1999. Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Schwab, K., 2016. The Global Competitiveness Report 2016-2017. Full Data Edition, [Pdf] Available at: <http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2016-2017/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2016-2017_FINAL.pdf>. Accesed 10 January 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Siltaoja, M.E., 2006. Value priorities as combining core factors between CSR and reputation - a qualitative study. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), pp.91-111.10.1007/s10551-006-9042-4]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Stanwick, P.A. and Stanwick, S.D., 1998. The Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Size, Financial Performance and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(2), pp.195-204.]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Strautmanis, J., 2007. Acquiring Corporate Social Responsibility Approach Through Business Study Process. Riga: University of Latvia.]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Swanson, D.L., 1999. Toward an integrative theory of business and society: a research strategy for corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 24, pp.506-521.10.5465/amr.1999.2202134]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Transparency International, 2016. Corruption Perceptions Index 2016 Available at: <http://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2016>. ]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Trevino, L. and Nelson, K., 2007. Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk About How to Do It Right, 4th edn. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Ubius, U. and Alas, R., 2009. Organizational Culture Types as Predictors of Corporate Social Responsibility. Engineering Economics, 1(61), pp.90-99.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Wood. D.J., 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, pp.691-718.10.5465/amr.1991.4279616]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Yu, Y. and Choi, Y., 2016. Stakeholder pressure and CSR adoption: the mediating role of organizational culture for Chinese companies. The Social Science Journal, 53(2), pp.226-235.10.1016/j.soscij.2014.07.006]Search in Google Scholar