Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Comparing various influences on adhesive contact with friction

   | 30. Apr. 2020

Zitieren

[1] Lemaitre J, Desmorat R (2005) Engineering damage mechanics. Springer, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Besson J, Cailletaud G, Chaboche J, Forest S (2010) Non-linear mechanics of materials. Springer, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-90-481-3356-7Search in Google Scholar

[3] Roubíček, T., Kružík, M., Zeman, J. (2012). Delamination and adhesive contact models and their mathematical analysis and numerical treatment. In V. Mantič, editor, Mathematical Methods and Models in Composites, chapter 9, pages 349–400. Imperial College Press, 2014.10.1142/9781848167858_0009Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bourdin, B., Francfort, A., Marigo, J.J. (2008). The Variational Approach to Fracture, Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6395-4Search in Google Scholar

[5] Raous, M., Cangémi, L., Cocu. M. (1999) A consistent model coupling adhesion, friction, and unilateral contact. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 177:383–399.10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00389-2Search in Google Scholar

[6] Sofonea, M., Han, W., Shillor, M. (2006) Analysis and approximation of contact problems with adhesion or damage. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.10.1201/9781420034837Search in Google Scholar

[7] Del Piero, G., Raous, M. (2010) A unified model for adhesive interfaces with damage, viscosity and friction. Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids, 29:496–507.10.1016/j.euromechsol.2010.02.004Search in Google Scholar

[8] Kružík M, Panagiotopoulos C, Roubíček T (2015) Quasistatic adhesive contact delaminating in mixed mode and its numerical treatment. Math Mech Solids 20:582–599.10.1177/1081286513507942Search in Google Scholar

[9] Wriggers. P. (2006) Computational contact mechanics (2nd edition). Springer, Berlin, 2006.10.1007/978-3-540-32609-0Search in Google Scholar

[10] Vodička, R., Mantič, V., Roubíček, T. (2014) Energetic versus maximally dissipative local solutions of a quasi-static rate-independent mixed-mode delamination model. Meccanica, 49:2933–296.10.1007/s11012-014-0045-4Search in Google Scholar

[11] Vodička, R. (2016) A quasi-static interface damage model with cohesive cracks: SQP–SGBEM implementation. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem., 62:123–140.10.1016/j.enganabound.2015.09.010Search in Google Scholar

[12] Vodička, R., Mantič, V., Roubíček, T. (2017) Quasistatic normal-compliance contact problem of visco-elastic bodies with Coulomb friction implemented by QP and SGBEM. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 315:249–272.10.1016/j.cam.2016.10.010Search in Google Scholar

[13] Vodička, R. Mantič, V. (2017) An energy-based formulation of a quasi-static interface damage model with a multilinear cohesive law. Disc. Cont. Dynam. Syst. - S, 10:1539–1561.10.3934/dcdss.2017079Search in Google Scholar

[14] Roubíček, T. (2019) A general thermodynamical model for adhesive frictional contacts between viscoelastic or poro-viscoelastic bodies at small strains. Interfaces and Free Boundaries 21: 169-198.10.4171/IFB/420Search in Google Scholar

[15] Rossi, R., Roubíček, T. (2013) Adhesive contact delaminating at mixed mode, its thermodynamics and analysis. Interfaces and Free Boundaries, 14:1–37.10.4171/IFB/293Search in Google Scholar

[16] Roubíček, T., Mantič, V., Panagiotopoulos, C.G. (2013) Quasistatic mixed-mode delamination model. Discr. Cont. Dynam. Systems Ser. S, 6:591–610.10.3934/dcdss.2013.6.591Search in Google Scholar

[17] Banks-Sills, L., Ashkenazi, D. (2000). A note on fracture criteria for interface fracture. Int. J. Fract. 103, 177–188.10.1023/A:1007612613338Search in Google Scholar

[18] Hutchinson, J.W., Suo, Z. (1992). Mixed mode cracking in layered materials. Advances in Applied Mechanics, 29, 63–191.10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70164-9Search in Google Scholar

[19] Sutradhar, A., Paulino, G.H., Gray, L.J. (2008) The symmetric Galerkin boundary element method. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Vodička, R., Mantič, V., París, F. (2007) Symmetric variational formulation of BIE for domain decomposition problems in elasticity - an SGBEM approach for nonconforming discretizations of curved interfaces. CMES – Comp. Model. Eng., 17:173–203.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Panagiotopoulos, C.G., Mantič, V., Roubíček, T. (2014) A simple and efficient BEM implementation of quasistatic linear visco-elasticity. Int. J. of Solids and Structures, 51:2261–2271.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.02.028Search in Google Scholar

[22] Dostál, Z. (2009) Optimal Quadratic Programming Algorithms, Springer Optimization and Its Applications, 23. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-84806-8_2Search in Google Scholar

[23] Nocedal, J., Wright, S. (2006) Numerical Optimization. Springer.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Cocou, M., Schryve, M., Raous, M. (2010) A dynamic unilateral contact problem with adhesion and friction in viscoelasticity. Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 61:721–743.10.1007/s00033-009-0027-xSearch in Google Scholar

[25] Kšiňan, J., Vodička, R. (2016) An SGBEM implementation of contact models coupling the interface damage and Coulomb friction in fibre-matrix composites. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 168:76–92.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.02.043Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1338-7278
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Technik, Einführungen und Gesamtdarstellungen, andere