[Baber, C. (2003). Cognition and tool use: Forms of engagement in animal and human tool use. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baber, C. (2006). Cognitive aspects of tool use. Applied Ergonomics, 37, 3–15.10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Baber, C., Cengiz, T. G., & Parekh, M. (2014). Tool use as distributed cognition: How tools help, hinder and define manual skill. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 116, 1–14.10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00116]Search in Google Scholar
[Baber, C., Cengiz, T. G., Starke, S., & Parekh, M., (2015a). Objective classification of performance in the use of a piercing saw in jewellery making. Applied Ergonomics, 51, 211–221.10.1016/j.apergo.2015.05.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Baber, C., Starke, S., & Cengiz, T. G. (2015b). Using 1/f scaling to study variability and dexterity in simple tool using tasks. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA: HFES.10.1177/1541931215591091]Search in Google Scholar
[Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biryukova, E. V., & Bril, B. (2008). Organization of goaldirected action at a high-level of motor skill: The case of stone-knapping in India. Motor Control, 12, 181–209.10.1123/mcj.12.3.181]Search in Google Scholar
[Bril, B., Rein, R., Nonaka, T., Wenban-Smith, F., & Dietrich, G. (2010). The role of expertise in tool use: Skill differences in functional action adaptations to task constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 825–839.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage, 12, 478–484.10.1006/nimg.2000.0635]Search in Google Scholar
[Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8367.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Cutler, A. (1994). The hand of the master: craftsmanship, ivory and society in Byzantium. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grafton, S. T., Fadiga, L., Arbib, M. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuoroimage, 6, 231–236.10.1006/nimg.1997.0293]Search in Google Scholar
[Guastello, S. J. (2000). Nonlinear dynamics in psychology. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 6, 11–29.]Search in Google Scholar
[Higuchi, S., Imamizu, H., & Kawato, M. (2007). Cerebellar activity evoked by common tool-use execution and imagery tasks: an fMRI study. Cortex, 43, 350–358.10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70460-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Ingvaldsen, R. P., & Whiting, H. T. A. (1997). Modern views on motor skill learning are not ‘representative’ ! Human Movement Science, 16, 705–732.10.1016/S0167-9457(97)00022-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson-Frey, S. H. (2004). The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 71–78.10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamm K., Thelen E., & Jensen J. L. (1990). A dynamical systems approach to motor development. Physical Therapy, 70, 763–775.10.1093/ptj/70.12.763]Search in Google Scholar
[Kello, C. T., Beltz, B. C., Holden, J. G., & van Orden, G. C. (2007). The emergent coordination of cognitive function. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 551–568.10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.551]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krist, V. (2012). The cognitive bases of human tool use. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 203–218.10.1017/S0140525X11001452]Search in Google Scholar
[Latash M. L., Scholz, J. P., & Schöner, G. (2002). Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 30, 26–31.10.1097/00003677-200201000-00006]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25–45.10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190143]Search in Google Scholar
[Mitra, S., Riley, M. A., & Turvey, M. T. (1997). Chaos in human rhythmic movement. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 195–198.10.1080/00222899709600834]Search in Google Scholar
[Newell K. M., & Corcos, D. M. (1993). Issues in variability and motor control. In K. M. Newell & D. M. Corcos (Eds.), Variability and motor control (pp. 1–12). Champagne, IL: Human Kinetics.]Search in Google Scholar
[Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action. New York: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parry, R., Dietrich, G., & Bril, B. (2014). Tool use ability depends on understanding of functional dynamics and not specific joint coordination profiles. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 306, 1–15.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pye, D. (1968). The nature and art of workmanship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rein, R., Bril, B., & Nonaka, T. (2013). Coordination strategies used in stone knapping. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 150, 539–550.10.1002/ajpa.22224]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of aim, direction, and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444–474.10.1037/0096-3445.109.4.444]Search in Google Scholar
[Roux, V., Bril, B., & Dietrich, G. (1995). Skills and learning difficulties involved in stone knapping: The case of stone-bead knapping in Khambhat, India. World Archaeology, 27, 63–87.10.1080/00438243.1995.9980293]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidt, R. A. (2003). Motor schema theory after 27 years: Reflections and implications for a new theory. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 366–375.10.1080/02701367.2003.10609106]Search in Google Scholar
[Summers, J. J., & Anson, J. G. (2009). Current status of the motor program: Revisited. Human Movement Science, 28(5), 566–577.10.1016/j.humov.2009.01.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Thelen E. (1990). Motor development: a new synthesis. American Psychologist, 50, 79–95.10.1037/0003-066X.50.2.79]Search in Google Scholar
[Turvey, M. (1990). Coordination. American Psychologist, 45, 938–953.10.1037/0003-066X.45.8.938]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Leeuwen, L., Smitsman, A., & van Leeuwen, C. (1994). Affordances, perceptual complexity, and the development of tool use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(1), 174–191.]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Orden, G. C., Holden, J. G., & Turvey, M. T. (2003). Self-organization of cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 331–350.10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.331]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagenmakers, E.-J., Farrell, S., & Ratcliff, R. (2004). Estimation and interpretation of l/f alpha noise in human cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 579–615.10.3758/BF03196615]Search in Google Scholar
[Weisberg, J., van Turennout, M., & Martin, A. (2007). A neural system for learning about object function. Cerebral Cortex, 17(3), 513–521.10.1093/cercor/bhj176]Search in Google Scholar