[ANDERSON, J. A. and M. K. LUCKERT (2004): “Financial analysis of hybrid poplar: Is intensive forest management a viable option for priority zoning in boreal regions?” WORKING DRAFT, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, October.]Search in Google Scholar
[BAILEY, R. (1997): “American Chestnut Foundation.” Center for Private Conservation. CEI, Washington, D.C.]Search in Google Scholar
[BOWYER, J. L. (2004): “Changing realities in forest sector markets,” Unasylva, vol. 55, no. 219, pps. 59-64.]Search in Google Scholar
[CARLE, J., P. VUORINEN and A. DEL LUNGO (2002): “Status and Trends in Global Plantation Development,” Forest Products Journal, July/August 2002, vol. 52, No. 7, pages 1-13.]Search in Google Scholar
[CARSON, M. and CHR. and S. WALTER (2004): “The Future of Forest Biotechnology.” In: Forest Biotechnology in Latin America, edited by R. KELLISON, S. MCCORD & KEVAN, M. A. Gartland. March, pps 13-40.]Search in Google Scholar
[CHAIX, G. and O. MONTEUUIS (2004): “Biotechnology in the Forestry Sector,” chapter 2 in Preliminary review of biotechnology in forestry: including genetic modification, Forest Genetic Resources Working Papers, Forestry Department, FAO, Rome, December.]Search in Google Scholar
[CLIVE, J. (2004): Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/ GM Crops: 2004, http// www.agbios.com (Accessed May 25, 2005). ]Search in Google Scholar
[Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Secretariat (2006): Ref: SCBD/STTM/RK/MG/VA/54726. ]Search in Google Scholar
[CropBiotech Update (2005): EU count: Austria can’t ban GM planting. October 7, 20058595-return-255-56981888@lb.bcentral.com; on behalf of; CropBiotech Net [knowledge.center@isaaa.org], http://www.europabio.org. ]Search in Google Scholar
[CropBiotech Update (2006): Brazil’s National Biotech Strategy Unveiled. July 7, 2006. http://www.isaaa.org/kc/CBTNews/2006_Issues/July/CBT_July_7.htm#6 ]Search in Google Scholar
[CropBiotech Update (2006a): Brazil: Curtailing Research and Technological Innovations. July 14. http://www.isaaa.org/kc/CBTNews/bcentral/cbt_update.htm#6]Search in Google Scholar
[DIFAZIO, S. P., G. T. SLAVOV, J. BURCZYK, S. LEONARDI and S. H. STRAUSS (2004): Gene flow from tree plantation and implications for transgenic risk assessment. In: CHR. WALTER and M. CARSON (eds.). Plantation forest biotechnology for the 21st century. Kerala, India: Research Signpost.]Search in Google Scholar
[DOTY, S. L., Q. T. SHANG, A. M. WILSON, A. D. WESTERGREEN, L. A. NEWMAN, S. E. STRAND and M. P. GORDON (2000): Enhanced metabolism of halogenated hydrocarbons in transgenic plants containing mammalian cytochrome P450 2E1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sciences 97(12): 6287-6291.10.1073/pnas.97.12.6287]Search in Google Scholar
[EL-LAKANY, M. H. (2004): Äre genetically modified trees a threat to forests? Unasylva 217, vol. 55. (2004/2) pps 45-47.]Search in Google Scholar
[FAO (2004): “Agricultural Biotechnology” in The State of Food and Agriculture: 2003-04, Rome]Search in Google Scholar
[FAUSTMANN, M. (1995): “Calculation of the Value which Forest Land and Immature Stands Possess for Forestry,” reprinted in the Journal of Forest Economics, 1. pp.7-44.]Search in Google Scholar
[FENNING, M. and J. GERSHENSON (2002): Where will the wood come from? Plantation forests and the role of biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 20: 291-295.10.1016/S0167-7799(02)01983-2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[GOLDMAN, M. L. (2003): Legal perspective on the transgenic papaya licensing program. Paper presented at conference, Modifying Reproduction in Urban Trees, North Carolina Biotechnology Center, February 12-23. mgold@nixonpeabody.com.]Search in Google Scholar
[HINCHEE, M. (2003): Personal communication, April 28, Summerville, NC. HANCOCK, J. F. and K. E. HOKANSON (2004): Invasiveness of transgenic vs.. exotic plant species: How useful is the analogy. In: The Bioengineered Forest, S. STRAUSS and]Search in Google Scholar
[H. D. BRADSHAW, editors, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. SAAA (2005): EU Council fails to lift illegal bans on GM products. Crop Biotech Update, July 1. <Crop-Biotech%20Update%210%July>.]Search in Google Scholar
[JAFFE, G. (2005): “Withering on the Vine: Will Agricultual Biocrops Promises Bear Fruit?” Center For Science in the Public Interest, February 2, pps14, http://www.cspinet.org/new/pdf/withering_on_the_vine.pdf (Accessed August 5, 2006).]Search in Google Scholar
[MANN, C. C. and M. L. PLUMMER (2002): „Forest Biot Edges out of the Lab.“ Science, vol. 295, pps: 1626-1629. ]Search in Google Scholar
[MCLEAN, M. A. and P. J. CHAREST (2000): The regulation of transgenic trees in North America. Silvae Genetica 49(6): 233-39.]Search in Google Scholar
[MLYNAROVA, L. and J.-P. NAP (2006): “Transgenic Plants that Make non-transgenic Pollen.” In: ISB News Report, pps 8-9. http://www.isb.vt.edu/news/2006/news06.aug.htm#aug0603 (Accessed August 5, 2006).]Search in Google Scholar
[NIGHTINGALE, P. and P. MARTIN (2004): “The Myth of the biotech revolution,” in TRENDS in Biotechnology, Vol. 22, No. 11, November.10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.09.01015491800]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pew (2004): “International Agreements: The WTO and the Biosafety Protocol.” http://pewagbiotech.org/buzz/display.php3?StoryID=126. Accessed September 24, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[PRAY, C. (2005): “Registration Requirements and Their Costs and Implications: Lessons fro LDCs” Paper delivered to a meeting on the Economics of Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnologies, March 11. Arlington, VA.]Search in Google Scholar
[PULLMAN, G. S., J. CAIRNEY and G. PETER (1998): Clonal Forestry and Genetic Engineering: Where We Stand, Future Prospects, and Potential Impacts on Mill Operations. TAPPI Journal 81(2).]Search in Google Scholar
[ROTTMANN, W. H., L. M. KLESS and S. CHANG (2005): Acceleration of Flowering in Sweetgum Using LEAFY. http://www.treebiotech2003.norrnod.se/s3_o.htm (accessed 6/01/05).]Search in Google Scholar
[ROTTMANN, W. H., R. MEILAN, L. A. SHEPPARD, A. M. BRUNNER, J. S. SKINNER, C. MA, S. CHENG, L. JOUANIN, G. PILATE and S. H. STRAUSS (2000): “Diverse effects of overexpression of LEAFY and PTLF, a poplar (Populus) homolog of LEAFY/FLORICAULA, in transgenic poplar and Arabidopsis.” Plant Journal 22: 235-246.10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00734.x10849341]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[SEDJO, R. A. (2005): “Global Agreements and U.S. Forestry: Genetically Modified Trees,” Journal of Forestry, April/May.]Search in Google Scholar
[SOHNGEN, B., R. MENDELSOHN and R. SEDJO (1999): “Forest management, Conservation and Global Timber Markets.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81: 1-13.10.2307/1244446]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[STRAUSS, S. H., A. BRUNNER, V. B. BUSOV, C. MA and R. MEILAN (2004): “Ten Lessons from 15 Years of Transgenic Populus Research.” In: Forest Biotechnology in Latin America, Proceedings from the Workshop Biotecnologia Forestal, editors R. KELLISON, S. MCCORD & M. A. KEVAN, Gartland. 2004. PPS 97-106. 10.1093/forestry/77.5.455]Search in Google Scholar
[SU, X., S. BING-YU, H. ZHANG, Q. LIE-JIAN, H. and Z. Xianghua (2003): Advances in tree genetic engineering in China, Paper submitted to the XII World Forestry Congress, Quebec, Canada. September.]Search in Google Scholar
[TOTHOVA and OEHMKE (2005): Biotechnology and Club Behaviour in Agricultural Trade. In: R. E. EVENSON and V. SANTANIELLO (eds.). International trade and policies for genetically modified products. Wallington, UK: CABI Publishing, CAB International.10.1079/9780851990569.0022]Search in Google Scholar
[TRAXLER, G. (2005): Presentation on “Agriculture Biotech” to FAO, June 29, 2005. Rome.]Search in Google Scholar
[WALTER, CHR. and S. KILLERBY (2004): A global study on the state of forest tree genetic modification. In: Preliminary review of biotechnology in forestry: Including genetic modification. Forest Genetic Resources Working Papers. Rome: Forestry Department, FAO, Chapter 3.]Search in Google Scholar
[WANG, H. (2004): “The state of genetically modified forest trees in China.” Chapter 4 in Preliminary review of biotechnology in forestry: including genetic modification, Forest Genetic Resources Working Papers, Forestry Department, FAO, Rome.]Search in Google Scholar
[WELLS, B.: President, ArborGen. Personal conversation. Summerville, S.C. July 20, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[WILLIAMS, C. G. (2004): Genetically modified pines at the interface of private and public lands: A case study approach. Paper presented at USDA Forest Service, January 12, Yates Building, Washington, DC.]Search in Google Scholar
[XU, Z., M. T. BENNETT, R. TAO and J. XU (2004): “China’s Sloping Land Conversion Program Four Years on: Current Situation and Pending Issues”, International Forestry Review 6(3-4): 317-326.10.1505/ifor.6.3.317.59976]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
