[Alderman, H. (1998). “Social Assistance in Albania: Decentralization and Targeted Transfers”. LSMS Working Paper no. 134, World Bank, Washington D.C.10.1596/0-8213-4245-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Azfar, O. and J. Livingston (2002). “Federalist Disciplines or Local Capture? An Empirical Analysis of Decentralization in Uganda.” IRIS, University of Maryland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Azfar, O., S. Kahkonen, and P. Meagher (2001). “Conditions for Effective Decentralised Governance: A Synthesis of Research Findings.” IRIS working paper # 256, University of Maryland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Azfar, O., S. Kahkonen, J. Livingston, P. Meagher, and D. Rutherford (2000). “Making Decentralization Work: An Empirical Investigation of Governance and Public Services in Uganda.” IRIS, University of Maryland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Azfar, O.,T. Gurgur, S. Kahkonen, A. Lanyi, and P. Meagher (2000). “Decentralization and Governance: An empirical investigation of public service delivery in the Philippines.” IRIS, University of Maryland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bardhan, P. and D. Mookherjee, 1998, “Expenditure Decentralization and the Delivery of Public Services in Developing Countries”, CIDER Working Paper C98/104.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bardhan, P. and D. Mookherjee (2003). “Poverty Alleviation Effort of West Bengal Panchayats”.http://econ.bu.edu/dilipm/wkpap.htm/epwsumm.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Dickey, D. A. and W. A. Fuller, (1981), “Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root”, Econometrica, 49, 1057-1079.10.2307/1912517]Search in Google Scholar
[Enikolopov, R. and E. Zhuravskaya (2003). “Decentralization and Political Institutions.”http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/webfac/bardhan/e271_f03/oct6.pdf10.2139/ssrn.408060]Search in Google Scholar
[Eskeland, G. and D. Filmer (2002). “Autonomy, Participation, and Learning in Argentine Schools: Findings and Their Implications for Decentralization.” Policy Research Working Paper 2766. World Bank, Washington DC.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eskeland, G. and D. Filmer, 2000, “Does Decentralization Improve Learning? Autonomy and Parental Participation in Argentine Schools”, mimeo, World Bank.]Search in Google Scholar
[Estache, A. and S. Sinha (1995). “Does Decentralization Increase Spending on Public Infrastructure?” The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 1457.]Search in Google Scholar
[Faguet, J. and Paul G., 2001, “Does Decentralization Increase Government Responsiveness to Local Needs? Evidence from Bolivia”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2516.10.2139/ssrn.260579]Search in Google Scholar
[Faguet, J. P. (1997). “Decentralization and Local Government Performance.” World Bank/FAO/GTZ paper for the Technical Consultation on Decentralization, Rome.]Search in Google Scholar
[Faguet, J.P. (2001). “Does Decentralization Increase Responsiveness to Local Needs? Evidence from Bolivia.” Policy Research Working Paper #2516. World Bank, Washington DC.10.2139/ssrn.260579]Search in Google Scholar
[Gurgur, T. and A. Shah (2002). “Localization and Corruption: Panacea or Pandora’s Box?” In Ehtisham Ahmad and Vito Tanzi,veditors, Managing Fiscal Decentralization, pp. 46–67. Routledge Press, London and New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Galasso, E. and M. Ravallion (2001). “Decentralised Targeting of an Anti-Poverty Program.” Development Research Group Working Paper. World Bank, Washington D.C.10.1596/1813-9450-2738]Search in Google Scholar
[Galasso, E. and M. Ravallion (1998). “Reaching Poor Areas in a Federal System.” Policy Research Working Paper #1901. World Bank, Washington DC.]Search in Google Scholar
[Habibi, N., C. Huang, D. Miranda, V. Murillo, G. Ranis, M. Sarkar, and F. Stewart (2001). “Decentralization in Argentina.” Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper 825, Yale University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huther, J. and A. Shah (1998). “Applying a Simple Measure of Good Governance to the Debate on Fiscal Decentralization.” Policy Research Working Paper Number 1894. World Bank, Washington, DC.]Search in Google Scholar
[Isham, J. and S. Kähkönen (1999). “What Determines the Effectiveness of Community-based Water Projects? Evidence from Central Java, Indonesia on Demand Responsiveness, Service Rules, and Social Capital.” University of Maryland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Khaleghian, P (2003). “Decentralization and Public Services: The Case of Immunization.” Policy Research Working Paper 2989. World Bank, Washington, DC.10.1596/1813-9450-2989]Search in Google Scholar
[King, E. and B. Ozler (1998). “What’s Decentralization Got To Do With Learning? The Case of Nicaragua’s School Autonomy Reform. Development,” Research Group Working Paper, World Bank, Washington D.C.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lieberman, S.S., (2002), “Decentralization and Health in the Philippines and Indonesia: An Interim Report”, East Asia Human Development.]Search in Google Scholar
[Litvack, J. and J. Seddon (1999), “Decentralization Briefing Notes”, World Bank Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[Narayan, P. K. (2005), “The savings and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests,” Applied Economics, 37, 1979-1990.10.1080/00036840500278103]Search in Google Scholar
[Narayan, P.K., Narayan, S., (2005), “Estimating income and price elasticities of imports for Fiji in a cointegration framework,” Economic Modelling, 22, 423–438.10.1016/j.econmod.2004.06.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Oates, W. (1972). “Fiscal Federalism”, Hamshire, England: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1972.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oates, W. (1977). “The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism”, Lexington Books, Toronto 1977.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oates, W. (1999). “An essay on fiscal federalism”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXVII (September 1999), pp. 1120-1149.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. and R. J. Smith, (2001), “Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of long run relationships”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289-326.10.1002/jae.616]Search in Google Scholar
[Pesaran, M.H. and Shin, Y. (1999), “An autoregressive distributed-led modeling approach to cointegration analysis.” In Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century. The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, ed. Steinar Strom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pakistan. Finance Division, Economic Advisor’s Wing: Economic Survey 2010-2011. Islamabad.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pakistan. Ministry of Education & MSU. GOP. (2003). Technical Group Meeting on Devolution and Decentralization: Implications for the Education Sector. Islamabad.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pakistan. Ministry of Education, Education For All Wing. (2002). Facts and Figures: Islamabad.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pakistan. Ministry of Education. (2003). Education Sector Reforms: Action Plan 2001-2005. Islamabad.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pakistan. Ministry of Education. (2001). Education Sector Reforms: Action Plan 2001-2004. Islamabad.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pakistan. Ministry of Education. (2003). National Plan of Action on Education for All (2001-2015): Islamabad.]Search in Google Scholar
[Qian, Y. and Weingast (1997). “Federalism as a commitment to preserving market incentives”, Journal of Economic perspectives, Vol II, No. 4: 83-92.10.1257/jep.11.4.83]Search in Google Scholar
[Saeed, M. (2007). “Education System of Pakistan and the UK: Comparisons in Context to Inter provincial and Inter-countries Reflections.” Bulletin of Education & Research, 29 (2), 43-57.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shah, A (1998). “Balance, Accountability and responsiveness – Lessons About Decentralization.” Policy Research Working Paper No. 2021, December, World Bank, Washington, DC]Search in Google Scholar
[Shah, A (1998). “Fiscal Federalism and Macroeconomic Governance – For Better or For Worse?” Policy Research Working Paper No. 2005, November, World Bank, Washington, DC10.1596/1813-9450-2005]Search in Google Scholar
[Shah, A. (1994). “The Reform of Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Developing and Emerging Market Economies.” World Bank, Washington, DC.10.1596/0-8213-2836-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Shah, D.(2003). “Decentralization of educational system in Pakistan”, Presented at UNESCO Seminar on Decentralization Policies and Strategies in Education held at Buenos Aires, Argentina from 30th June to 3rd July, 2003]Search in Google Scholar
[Shah, D. (2003). “Decentralization in the education system of Pakistan: Policies and strategies.” Paper presented in UNESCO Seminar on Decentralization Policies and Strategies in Education, Buenos Aires, Argentina (p.20-21).]Search in Google Scholar
[Shami, P.A. & Hussain, K.S. (2006). “Development of education in Pakistan.” Islamabad. Academy of Educational Planning and Management, Ministry of Education (p.11-13 & 61)]Search in Google Scholar
[West, L. and C. Wong (1995). “Fiscal Decentralization and Growth Regional Disparities in Rural China: Some Evidence in the Provision of Social Services.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 11(4): 70 – 84.10.1093/oxrep/11.4.70]Search in Google Scholar
[Winkler, D. “Decentralization in Education: An Economic Perspective.” Washington, DC: World Bank, 1989.]Search in Google Scholar
[Winkler, D. “The Design and Administration of Intergovernmental Transfers: Fiscal Decentralization in Latin America.” World Bank Discussion Paper 235. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1994.10.1596/0-8213-2822-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Winkler, D. and Gershberg, Alec. “Education Decentralization in Latin America: The Effects on the Quality of Schooling.” Human Development Department LCSHD Paper Series No. 59. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[Winkler, D. and T. Rounds (1996). “Municipal and Private Sector Response to Decentralization and School Choice.” Economics of Education Review. 15 (4): 365–376.10.1016/S0272-7757(96)00036-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Zafar, F. (2003) “Fiscal Devolution in Education. Case Study Reflecting Initial Responses.” Islamabad: Ministry of Education.]Search in Google Scholar