[ANDERSSON, M., JOHANSSON, B., KARLSSON, C. & LÖÖF, H. (2012). Innovation and Growth: From R&D Strategies of Innovating Firms to Economy-wide Technological Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646685.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[ARROW, K. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In: R. R. Nelson (ed.). The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 609–626.10.1515/9781400879762-024]Search in Google Scholar
[BAREGHEH, A., ROWLEY, J. & SAMBROOK, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision. 47 (8). pp.1323–1339. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1108/0025174091098457810.1108/00251740910984578]Search in Google Scholar
[BROZEN, Y. (1951). Invention, Innovation, and Imitation. The American Economic Review, 41(2), 239–257.]Search in Google Scholar
[CASTELLACCI, F. (2011). How does competition affect the relationship between innovation and productivity? Estimation of a CDM model for Norway. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 20(7), 637-658.10.1080/10438599.2010.516535]Search in Google Scholar
[CLASSEN, N., CARREE, M., Van GILS, A., & PETERS, B. (2014). Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: an exploratory analysis. Small Business Economics, 42 (3), pp. 595-609. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9490-z10.1007/s11187-013-9490-z]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[COHEN, W.M., NELSON, R.R. & WALSH, J.P. (2000). Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not). [Online]. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w7552. [Accessed: 9 July 2012].]Search in Google Scholar
[CRÉPON, B., DUGUET, E., & MAIRESSEC, J. (1998). Research, Innovation And Productivi [Ty: An Econometric Analysis At The Firm Level. Economics of Innovation and new Technology, 7(2), 115-158.10.1080/10438599800000031]Search in Google Scholar
[DAMIJAN, J. P., KOSTEVC, Č., & ROJEC, M. (2011). Innovation and firms’ productivity growth in Slovenia: Sensitivity of results to sectoral heterogeneity and to estimation method (pp. 165-193). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.]Search in Google Scholar
[DAVID, P.A., HALL, B.H. & TOOLE, A.A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy. 29 (4–5). pp.497–529. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-610.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-6]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[DORAN, J., & O'LEARY, E. (2011). External interaction, innovation and productivity: an application of the innovation value chain to Ireland. Spatial Economic Analysis, 6 (2), pp. 199-222. http://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2011.55777710.1080/17421772.2011.557777]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[EBERSBERGER, B. & Lööf, H. (2005). Innovation Behaviour and Productivity Performance in the Nordic Region Does Foreign Ownership Matter? [Online]. Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies. Available from: http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/hhscesisp/0027.htm. [Accessed: 27 March 2012].]Search in Google Scholar
[EFRON, B. (1979). Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife. The Annals of Statistics. 7 (1). pp.1–26. http://doi.org/10.1214/aos/117634455210.1214/aos/1176344552]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[ETTLIE, J.E. & ROSENTHAL, S.R. (2011). Service versus Manufacturing Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 28 (2). pp.285–299. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00797.x10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00797.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[FASSIO, C. (2015). How Similar is Innovation in German, Italian and Spanish Medium-Technology Sectors? Implications for the Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Distance-to-the-Frontier Perspectives. Industry and Innovation, 22 (2), pp. 102-125. http://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2015.103316010.1080/13662716.2015.1033160]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[GILBERT, R.J. (2006). Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where Are We in the Competition--Innovation Debate? Innovation Policy and the Economy. 6. pp.159–215.10.1086/ipe.6.25056183]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[GOULD, W. (1995). Jackknife estimation. Stata Technical Bulletin. 4 (24). pp.25–29.]Search in Google Scholar
[GREENHALGH, C. & ROGERS, M. (2009). Innovation, Intellectual Property, and Economic Growth. Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[GRIFFITH, R., HUERGO, E., MAIRESSE, J., & PETERS, B. (2006). Innovation and productivity across four European countries. Oxford review of economic policy, 22 (4), 483-498. http://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grj02810.1093/oxrep/grj028]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[GRILICHES, Z. (1964). Research Expenditures, Education, and the Aggregate Agricultural Production Function. The American Economic Review. 54 (6). pp.961–974.]Search in Google Scholar
[HALL, B. H., LOTTI, F., & MAIRESSE, J. (2009). Innovation and productivity in SMEs: empirical evidence for Italy. Small Business Economics, 33 (1), pp. 13-33. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9184-810.1007/s11187-009-9184-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[HALL, B.H. & MAIRESSE, J. (2006). Empirical Studies of Innovation in the Knowledge Driven Economy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15 (4/5), 289–299. http://doi.org/10.1080/1043859050051276010.1080/10438590500512760]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[HALL, B.H. & Rosenberg, N. (2010). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation Set. Berkeley: Elsevier Science.]Search in Google Scholar
[HALPERN, L., & MURAKÖZY, B. (2012). Innovation, productivity and exports: the case of Hungary. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21 (2), 151-173. http://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2011.56199510.1080/10438599.2011.561995]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[HASHI, I., & STOJČIĆ, N. (2013). The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 4. Research Policy, 42(2), 353–366. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.01110.1016/j.respol.2012.09.011]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[HECKMAN, J.J. (1976). The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement. 5 (4). pp.475–492.]Search in Google Scholar
[JANZ, N., LÖÖF, H. & PETERS, B. (2004). Firm Level Innovation and Productivity - Is There a Common Story Across Countries? Problems and Perspectives in Management. Vol. 2. pp.184–204.]Search in Google Scholar
[KUZNETS, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review. 45 (1). pp.1–28.]Search in Google Scholar
[LEVIN, R.C., KLEVORICK, A.K., NELSON, R.R., WINTER, S.G., GILBERT, R. & GRILICHES, Z. (1987). Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 1987 (3). pp.783–831. http://doi.org/10.2307/253445410.2307/2534454]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[LOKSHIN, B. & MOHNEN, P. (2010). How effective are level-based R&D tax credits? Evidence from the Netherlands. [Online]. United Nations University, Maastricht Economic and social Research and training centre on Innovation and Technology. Available from: http://ideas.repec.org/p/dgr/unumer/2010040.html. [Accessed: 5 April 2012].]Search in Google Scholar
[LÖÖF, H. & Heshmati, A. (2006). On the relationship between innovation and performance: A sensitivity analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 15 (4–5). pp.317–344. http://doi.org/10.1080/1043859050051281010.1080/10438590500512810]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[MAIRESSE, J. & MOHNEN, P. (2002). Accounting for Innovation and Measuring Innovativeness: An Illustrative Framework and an Application. The American Economic Review. 92 (2). pp.226–230. http://doi.org/10.1257/00028280232018930210.1257/000282802320189302]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[MAIRESSE, J. & MOHNEN, P. (2010). Chapter 26 - Using Innovation Surveys for Econometric Analysis. In: B. H. H. and N. ROSENBERG (ed.). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Volume 2. [Online]. North-Holland, pp. 1129–1155. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169721810020101. [Accessed: 1 June 2016].10.3386/w15857]Search in Google Scholar
[MANSFIELD, E. (1964). Industrial Research and Development Expenditures: Determinants, Prospects, and Relation to Size of Firm and Inventive Output. The Journal of Political Economy. 72 (4). pp.319–340.10.1086/258914]Search in Google Scholar
[MANSFIELD, E. (1965). Rates of Return from Industrial Research and Development. The American Economic Review. 55 (1/2). pp.310–322.]Search in Google Scholar
[MANSFIELD, E. (1963). Size of Firm, Market Structure, and Innovation. The Journal of Political Economy. 71 (6). pp.556–576. http://doi.org/10.1086/25881510.1086/258815]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[MASSO, J. & VAHTER, P. (2008). Technological innovation and productivity in late-transition Estonia: econometric evidence from innovation surveys. The European Journal of Development Research. 20 (2). pp.240–261. http://doi.org/10.1080/0957881080206075110.1080/09578810802060751]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2005). Oslo Manual. [Online]. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Retrieved from http://www.oecdilibrary.org/content/book/9789264013100-en. [Accessed: 26 March 2016]]Search in Google Scholar
[Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2009). Innovation in Firms: A Microeconomic Perspective. [Online]. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/innovation-in-firms_9789264056213-en. [Accessed: 26 March 2017]]Search in Google Scholar
[POLDER, M., LEEUWEN, G. van, MOHNEN, P. & RAYMOND, W. (2009). Productivity effects of innovation modes. [Online]. University Library of Munich, Germany. Available from: http://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/18893.html. [Accessed: 26 March 2016].]Search in Google Scholar
[RAFFO, J., LHUILLERY, S., & MIOTTI, L. (2008). Northern and southern innovativity: a comparison across European and Latin American countries. The European Journal of Development Research, 20 (2), pp. 219-239. http://doi.org/10.1080/0957881080206077710.1080/09578810802060777]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[RAYMOND, W., MAIRESSE, J., MOHNEN, P., & PALM, F. (2015). Dynamic models of R & D, innovation and productivity: Panel data evidence for Dutch and French manufacturing. European Economic Review, 78, pp. 285-306. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.06.00210.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.06.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[RAYMOND, W., MOHNEN, P., PALM, F., & van der LOEFF, S. S. (2006). A classification of Dutch manufacturing based on a model of innovation. De Economist, 154 (1), pp. 85-105. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-006-0005-z10.1007/s10645-006-0005-z]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[ROUD, V., (2007). Firm-level research on innovation and productivity: Russian experience. In: Proceeding from the Conference on Micro Evidence on Innovation in Developing Countries (MEIDE). Maastricht. Available from: [Accessed: 4 March 2016].]Search in Google Scholar
[SCHMOOKLER, J. (1959). Bigness, Fewness, and Research. Journal of Political Economy. 67 (6). pp.628–632. http://doi.org/10.1086/25825110.1086/258251]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[SCHUMPETER, J. (1934). The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[SOLOW, R. (1964). Capital, Labor, and Income in Manufacturing. In: The Behavior Of Income Shares: Selected Theoretical and Empirical Issues. Studies in income and wealth. [Online]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 101–142. Available from: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c1844. [Accessed: 29 March 2016].]Search in Google Scholar
[Van BEVEREN, I. (2012). Total Factor Productivity Estimation: A Practical Review. Journal of Economic Surveys. 26 (1). pp.98–128. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00631.x10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00631.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[VILLARD, H. H., (1958). Competition, Oligopoly, and Research. Journal of Political Economy, 66(6), 483–497. http://doi.org/10.1086/25810110.1086/258101]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[VOCHOZKA, M., STRAKOVÁ, J., & VÁCHAL, J., (2015). Model to Predict Survival of Transportation and Shipping Companies. Naše more. 62 (SI). pp.109–113.10.17818/NM/2015/SI4]Search in Google Scholar
[VOKOUN, M., (2014). R&D and Innovation Activities, Search for Better Definitions and an Economic-Historical Approach. In Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences (No. 0402131). International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.]Search in Google Scholar
[VOKOUN, M., (2016). Innovation behaviour of firms in a small open economy: the case of the Czech manufacturing industry. Empirica. 43 (1). pp.111–139. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-015-9296-010.1007/s10663-015-9296-0]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[ZELLNER, A., & THEIL, H., (1962). Three-Stage Least Squares: Simultaneous Estimation of Simultaneous Equations. Econometrica. 30 (1). pp.54–78. http://doi.org/10.2307/191128710.2307/1911287]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar