Universal Design for Learning: the relationship between subjective simulation, virtual environments, and inclusive education

Aquario, D., Pais, I., &Ghedin, E. (2018). Accessibilità alla conoscenza e Universal Design. Uno studio esplorativo con docenti e studenti universitari. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION FOR INCLUSION, 5(2), 93-106.Search in Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (Ed.). (1996). Il senso di autoefficacia. Aspettative su di sé e azione. Edizioni Erickson.Search in Google Scholar

CAST (2008). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines Version 1.0.Search in Google Scholar

Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (2005). L’evoluzione della cultura. Odile Jacob.Search in Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dewey J. (1981), Esperienza e educazione, tr. it., La Nuova Italia, Firenze.Search in Google Scholar

Foster, A. L. (2007). Immersive education’submerges students in online worlds made for learning. Chronicle of HigherEducation, 54(17), A22.Search in Google Scholar

Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: development, validity and applications. Learning EnvironmentsResearch, 1, 7-33.10.1023/A:1009932514731Search in Google Scholar

Frauenfelder, E. Z. (1983). La prospettiva educativa tra biologia e cultura. Liguori.Search in Google Scholar

Gardner, M., Gánem-Gutiérrez, A., Scott, J., Horan, B., & Callaghan, V. I. C. (2011). Immersive education spaces using Open Wonderland from pedagogy through to practice. In Multi-user virtual environments for the classroom: Practical approaches to teaching in virtual worlds (pp. 190-205). IGI Global.Search in Google Scholar

Ghedin, E., &Mazzocut, S. (2017). Universal Design for Learning to value differencies: An explorative reasearch considering teachers’ perceptions. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, (18), 145-162.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, H. R., &McKhann, G. M. (2000). Student test scores are improved in a virtual learning environment. AdvPhysiolEduc, 23(1), 59-66.10.1152/advances.2000.23.1.S59Search in Google Scholar

Goldin, G. A., Epstein, Y. E., Schorr, R. Y., & Warner, L. B. (2011). Beliefs and engagement structures: behind the affective dimension of mathematical learning. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43, 547-560.10.1007/s11858-011-0348-zSearch in Google Scholar

Hektner, J. M., &Asakawa, K. (2001). Learning to like challenges. In M. Csikszentmihalyi, & B. Schneider (Eds.), Becoming adult (pp. 95-112). New York, NY: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2010). Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings: A review of the research. British journal of educational technology, 41(1), 33-55.10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00900.xSearch in Google Scholar

Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage, 14(1), S103-S109.10.1006/nimg.2001.0832Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Jeannerod, M. (2013). The Functional Role of Conscious Will in Voluntary Action: Cause or Consequence? A Position Paper. In Brains Top Down: Is Top-Down Causation Challenging Neuroscience? (pp. 103-120). World Scientific.Search in Google Scholar

Jeannerod, M., &Decety, J. (1995). Mental motor imagery: a window into the representational stages of action. Current opinion in neurobiology, 5(6), 727-732.10.1016/0959-4388(95)80099-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Luhmann, N., &Schorr, K. E. (1999). Il sistema educativo. Problemi di riflessività. Armando Editore.Search in Google Scholar

Mace, R. (1997). What is universal design. The Center for Universal Design at North Carolina State University. Retrieved Retrieved November, 19, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: a theoretical survey. Journal of human development, 6(1), 93-117.10.1080/146498805200034266Search in Google Scholar

Rose, D H, Gravel,J W, (2010), Technology and learning – meeting specialstudents’ needs, Center for Applied Special Technology, Elsevier Ltd.,Wakefield, MA, USA (pp. 119-124)10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00719-3Search in Google Scholar

Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(4), 47-51.10.1177/016264340001500407Search in Google Scholar

Rose, D. H., Gravel, J. W., & Gordon, D. T. (2013). Universal design for learning. The SAGE Handbook of Special Education: Two Volume Set.Search in Google Scholar

Santoianni, F. (2002). La formazione biodinamica dei sistemi cognitivi: epigenesi e criteri di educabilità. Le scienze bioeducative, 55-69.Search in Google Scholar

Santoianni, F. (2012a). Evoluzione culturale e sviluppo ontogenetico nella formazione situata delle strutture della conoscenza.Search in Google Scholar

Santoianni, F. (2012b). L’approccio bioeducativo alla letto-scrittura. Attività didattiche e laboratoriali per la scuola dell’infanzia e la scuola primaria. Edizioni Erickson.Search in Google Scholar

Santoianni, F. (2014). Modelli di studio. Apprendere con la teoria delle logiche elementari. Edizioni Centro Studi Erickson, Trento.Search in Google Scholar

Santoianni, F. (2017). Lo spazio e la formazione del pensiero: la scuola come ambiente di apprendimento. RESEARCH TRENDS IN HUMANITIES Education & Philosophy, 4, 37-43.Search in Google Scholar

Santoianni, F., &Sabatano, C. (2010). Per una pedagogia dello sviluppo: educabilità e formazione delle strutture della conoscenza. Potenzialeumano e patrimonioterritoriale, 149-164.Search in Google Scholar

Savia, G. (2015). Progettazione Universale per l’Apprendimento: un va-lido approccio per l’inclusione di tutti. Rivista Educare. it, 15(3).Search in Google Scholar

Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement. New York: Springer10.1007/978-1-4614-7089-2Search in Google Scholar

Shernoff, D. J., &Bempechat, J. (Eds.). (2014), Engaging youth in schools: Evi- dence-based models to guide future innovations, 113 (1). Columbia University. by Teachers College Record.10.1177/016146811411601312Search in Google Scholar

Shernoff, D. J., Kelly, S., Tonks, S. M., Anderson, B., Cavanagh, R. F., Sinha, S., & Abdi, B. (2016). Student engagement as a function of environmental complexity in high school classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 43, 52-60.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.12.003Search in Google Scholar

Story, M. F. (1998). Maximizing usability: the principles of universal design. Assistive technology, 10(1), 4-12.10.1080/10400435.1998.10131955Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Szaszkiewicz, J. (1988). Filosofia della cultura. Gregorian Biblical BookShop. Universal Design for Learning: Wakefield, MA.Search in Google Scholar

Welch, P. (Ed.). (1995). Strategies for teaching universal design. Mig Communications.Search in Google Scholar

World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. World Health Organization.Search in Google Scholar