[Allmendinger P., Haughton G., 2009. Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway. Environment and Planning A 41: 617-633.10.1068/a40208]Search in Google Scholar
[Desage F., Guéranger D., 2013. L’intercommunalité, les maires et notre démocratie. Métropolitiques, 24 avril. Online: http://www.metropolitiques.eu/L-intercommunalite-les-maires-et.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[Drucker R., 2012. Poverty in Lod thrives, but who benefits from its money? Nana10, 11.12. Online: http://news.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=937207 (in Hebrew).]Search in Google Scholar
[Haughton G., Allmendinger P., Oosterlynck S., 2013. Spaces of neoliberal experimentalism: Soft spaces, postpolitics, and neoliberal governmentality. Environment and Planning A 45: 217-234.10.1068/a45121]Search in Google Scholar
[Heinelt H., Razin E., Zimmerman K. (eds), 2011. Metropolitan governance, different paths in contrasting contexts: Germany and Israel. Campus, Frankfurt and New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Héritier A., Lehmkuhl D., 2008. The shadow of hierarchy and new modes of governance. Journal of Public Policy 28(1): 1-17.10.1017/S0143814X08000755]Search in Google Scholar
[Hulst R., van Monfort A. (eds), 2007. Inter-municipal cooperation in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht.10.1007/1-4020-5379-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Kerrouche E., 2008. L’intercommunalité en France. Montchrestien, Paris.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marom N., 2013. Activising space: The spatial politics of the 2011 protest movement in Israel. Urban Studies 50(13): 2826-2841.10.1177/0042098013477699]Search in Google Scholar
[Nemery J.-C. (ed.), 2010. Quelle nouvelle réforme pour les collectivites territoriales françaises. L’Harmattan, Paris.]Search in Google Scholar
[Razin E., 1998. Policies to control urban sprawl: Planning regulations or changes in the rules of the game. Urban Studies 35: 321-340.10.1080/0042098985005]Search in Google Scholar
[Razin E., Hazan A., 2001. Redrawing Israel’s local government map: Political decisions, court rulings or popular determination. Political Geography 20: 513-533.10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00005-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Razin E., Hazan A., 2006. Redistributing municipal wealth in Israel. Floersheimer Institute for Policy Studies, Jerusalem (in Hebrew).]Search in Google Scholar
[Razin E., Hazan A., 2013. Municipal-private partnerships in Israel: From local development to budgetary bypass. In: Pradhan P.K., Bucek J., Razin E. (eds), Geography of governance: Dynamics for local development. International Geographical Union, Commission on Geography of Governance: 77-88.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruano de la Fuente J.M., Schaap L., 2007. Democratic legitimacy of inter-municipal and regional governance. In: Bekkers V., Dijkstra G., Edwards A., Fenger M. (eds), Governance and the democratic deficit. Ashgate, Aldershot: 203-222.]Search in Google Scholar
[Savitch H.V., Vogel R.K., 2000. Paths to new regionalism. State and Local Government Review 32(3): 158-168.10.1177/0160323X0003200301]Search in Google Scholar
[Schaap L., Daemen H. (eds), 2012. Renewal in European local democracies. Springer, Wiesbaden.10.1007/978-3-531-18763-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Smismans S., 2008. New modes of governance and the participatory myth. West European Politics 31(5): 874-895.10.1080/01402380802234540]Search in Google Scholar
[Spicer Z., 2014. Linking regions, linking functions: Inter-municipal agreements in Ontario. Institute on Municipal Finance & Governance, University of Toronto.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tennant P., Zirnhelt D., 1973. Metropolitan government in Vancouver: The strategy of gentle imposition. Canadian Public Administration 16(1): 124-138.10.1111/j.1754-7121.1973.tb02113.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Thurmaier K., Wood C., 2004. Interlocal agreement as an alternative to consolidation. In: Carr J.B., Feiock R.C. (eds), City-county consolidation and its alternatives. M.E.Sharpe, Armonk, NY: 113-130.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wollmann H., 2010. Comparing two logics of interlocal cooperation: The cases of France and Germany. Urban Affairs Review 46(2): 263-292.10.1177/1078087410377608]Search in Google Scholar