Risk of the Maritime Supply Chain System Based on Interpretative Structural Model

1. H., Carvalho, A. P. Barroso, V. H.Machado, S. Azevedo, & Cruz-Machado, 2012. Supply chain redesign for resilience using simulation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62(1), 329-341.10.1016/j.cie.2011.10.003Search in Google Scholar

2. J. Lam, J. Dai, 2015. Developing supply chain security design of logistics service providers: an analytical network process-quality function deployment approach. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logistics Manage. 45 (No. 7), 674-690.10.1108/IJPDLM-12-2013-0293Search in Google Scholar

3. Y. C Yang, 2011. Risk management of Taiwan’s maritime supply chain security. Safety science, 49(3): 382-393.10.1016/j.ssci.2010.09.019Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. J. S. L. Lam, 2011. Patterns of maritime supply chains: slot capacity analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(2): 366-374. 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.016Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. R. Banomyong*, 2005, The impact of port and trade security initiatives on maritime supply-chain management. Maritime Policy & Management, 32(1): 3-13.10.1080/0308883042000326102Search in Google Scholar

6. P. Barnes, R. Oloruntoba, Assurance of security in maritime supply chains: Conceptual issues of vulnerability and crisis management. Journal of International Management, 11(4): 519-540.10.1016/j.intman.2005.09.008Search in Google Scholar

7. A. Mandal, S. G. Deshmukh, 1994. Vendor selection using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(6): 52-59.10.1108/01443579410062086Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. T. Minahan, 2005. The Supply Risk Benchmark Report. Aberdeen Group, Boston.Search in Google Scholar

9. V. Singhal, K. Hendricks, R. Zhang, 2009. The effect of operational slack diversification, and vertical relatedness on the stock market reaction to supply chain disruptions. J. Oper. Manag. 27 (3), 233-246.10.1016/j.jom.2008.09.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. F. Wiengarten, P. Humphreys, C. Gimenez, R. McIvor, 2016. Risk, risk management practices, and the success of supply chain integration. Int. J. Prod.Econ. 171 (3), 361-370.10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.03.020Search in Google Scholar

11. J. S. L .Lam, 2015. Designing a sustainable maritime supply chain: a hybrid QFD-ANP approach. Transp. Res. Part E 78, 70-81.10.1016/j.tre.2014.10.003Search in Google Scholar

12. M. Christopher, H. Peck, C. Rutherford, U. Juttner, 2003. Supply chain resilience. Cranfield Centre for Logistics & Supply Chain Management, November, appendix, 1.10.1108/09574090410700275Search in Google Scholar

13. C. H. Chang, J. J. Xu, D. P. Song, 2014. An analysis of safety and security risks in container shipping operations: a case study of Taiwan. Saf. Sci. 63 (3), 168-17810.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.008Search in Google Scholar

14. J. P. P. Vilko, J. M. Hallikas, 2012. Risk assessment in multimodal supply chains. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140, 586-595.10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.09.010Search in Google Scholar

15. S. Gurning, S. Cahoon, 2011. Analysis of multi-mitigation scenarios on maritime disruptions. Marit. Pol. Manage. 38 (3), 251-268.10.1080/03088839.2011.572701Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. UNCTAD, 2006. Maritime Security: Elements of an Analytical Framework for Compliance Measurement and Risk Assessment. Reported by UNCTAD, 1-10.Search in Google Scholar

17. U. Juttner, H. Peck, M. Christopher, 2003. Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research. Int. J. Logist.: Res. Appl. 6 (4), 197-210.10.1080/13675560310001627016Search in Google Scholar

18. J. S. L .Lam, 2015. Designing a sustainable maritime supply chain: a hybrid QFD-ANP approach. Transp. Res. Part E 78, 70-81.10.1016/j.tre.2014.10.003Search in Google Scholar