The Effect of Concurrent Visual Feedback on Controlling Swimming Speed

1. Figueiredo P., Machado J.L., Vilas-Boas J.P., Fernandes R.J. (2011). Reconstruction error of calibration volume’s coordinates for 3D swimming kinematics. Journal of Human Kinetics 29, 35-40.10.2478/v10078-011-0037-6358862423486761Search in Google Scholar

2. Fernandes R.J., Ribeiro J., Figueiredo P., Seifert L., Vilas-Boas J.P. (2012). Kinematics of the hip and body center of mass in front crawl. Journal of Human Kinetics 33, 15-23.10.2478/v10078-012-0040-6358867523486784Search in Google Scholar

3. Soares S.M., Fernandes R.J., Machado J.L., Maia J.A., Daly D.J., Vilas-Boas J.P. (2014). Fatigue thresholds assessments in 50 m all out swimming. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 9(6), 959-65.10.1123/ijspp.2013-041924622856Search in Google Scholar

4. Perez P., Llana S., Brizuela G., Encarnacion A. (2009). Effects of three feedback conditions on aerobic swim speeds. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 8, 30-36.Search in Google Scholar

5. Zatoń K., Szczepan S. (2014). The impact of immediate verbal feedback on the improvement of swimming technique. Journal of Human Kinetics 41, 129-137.10.2478/hukin-2014-0042412044725114741Search in Google Scholar

6. Schmidt R.A., Lee T.D. (1999). Motor control and learning: a behavioural emphasis. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics.Search in Google Scholar

7. Salmoni A.W., Schmidt R.A., Walter Ch.B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin 95, 355-386.10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.355Search in Google Scholar

8. Magill R.A. (1994). The influence of augmented feedback during skill learning depends on characteristics of the skill and the learner. Quest 46, 314-327.10.1080/00336297.1994.10484129Search in Google Scholar

9. Newell K.M., Walter C.B. (1981). Kinematic and kinetic parameters as information feedback in motor skill acquisition. Journal of Human Movement Studies 7, 235-254.Search in Google Scholar

10. Schmidt R.A., Young D.E. (1991). Methodology for motor learning: a paradigm for kinematic feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior 23, 13-24.10.1080/00222895.1991.994159014766528Search in Google Scholar

11. Carroll W., Bandura A. (1990). Representational guidance of action production in observational learning: A causal analysis. Journal of Motor Behavior 22, 85-97.10.1080/00222895.1990.1073550315111282Search in Google Scholar

12. Proteau L., Carnahan H. (2001). What causes specificity of practice in a manual aiming movement: vision dominance or transformation errors? Journal of Motor Behavior 33(3), 226-234.10.1080/0022289010960190811495827Search in Google Scholar

13. Seat J.E., Wrisberg C.A. (1996). The visual instruction system. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 67, 106-108.10.1080/02701367.1996.106079328736001Search in Google Scholar

14. Little W.S., McGullagh P. (1989). Motivation orientation and modeled instruction strategies: The effects of form and accuracy. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 11, 41-53.10.1123/jsep.11.1.41Search in Google Scholar

15. Silverman S.S., Woods A.M., Subramaniam P.R. (1998). Task structures, feedback to individual students, and student skill level in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 69, 420-424.10.1080/02701367.1998.106077189864762Search in Google Scholar

16. Marteniuk R.G. (1976). Information processing in motor skills. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Search in Google Scholar

17. Lee T., Swinnen S., Serrien J. (1994). Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest 46, 328-344.10.1080/00336297.1994.10484130Search in Google Scholar

18. Weinberg S., Gould D. (1995). Foundations of sport and exercise psychology. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics.Search in Google Scholar

19. Seifert L., Chollet D. (2005). A new index of flat breaststroke propulsion: A comparison of elite men and women. Journal of Sports Sciences 23, 309-320.10.1080/0264041041000172996415966349Search in Google Scholar

20. Vezos N., Gourgoulis V., Aggeloussis N., Kasimatis P., Christoforidis C., Mavromatis G. (2007). Underwater stroke kinematics during breathing and breath-holding front crawl swimming. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 6, 58-62.Search in Google Scholar

21. Adams J. (1971). A closed-loop theory for motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior 3, 111-150.10.1080/00222895.1971.1073489815155169Search in Google Scholar

22. Sanchez X., Bampouras M.T. (2006). Augmented feedback over a short period of time: Does it improve netball goalshooting performance? International Journal of Sport Psychology 37, 349-358.Search in Google Scholar

23. Gonzalez V., Sanchis E., Villalobos M., Brizuela G., Llana S., Tella V. (2002). A new electronic system for the control of swimming speed. In J.C. Chatard (ed.), Biomechanics and medicine in swimming IX (pp. 67-69). Saint-Etienne: University of Saint-Etienne.Search in Google Scholar

24. Boyce B.A. (1991). The effects of an instructional strategy with two schedules of augmented KP feedback upon skill acquisition of a selected shooting task. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 11, 47-58.10.1123/jtpe.11.1.47Search in Google Scholar

25. Wulf G., Shea C. (2002). Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9, 185-211.10.3758/BF0319627612120783Search in Google Scholar

26. Zatoń K., Klarowicz A. (2003). Speech as a factor causing the awareness of kinesthetic sensibility in the process of teaching-learning of motor function in swimming. Human Movement 2(8), 45-53.Search in Google Scholar