<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In this paper, we borrow the dramaturgical analysis from sociologists and use it to analyze how contemporary Russian elites communicate with the public. It is my goal to analyze the performance of the Russian political elite when presenting the changes caused by the worsening Russo-Western relations over the Ukrainian crisis to the domestic audiences, with focus on the impact of sanctions introduced by the Western countries last year. Which strategies, narratives and symbols remain the same and which are adjusted, erased or newly introduced by the political elite when communicating with the public in order to justify the contemporary situation? We will focus especially on two basic components of the narrative: the symbolic level, particularly the use of history, geopolitics and other symbolic topics to frame the current situation; the pragmatic level, especially adjustment of current strategies and introduction of new plans and partners who will help to manage the new situation. As we will clarify later, our analysis will focus on symbolic arguments used by Vladimir Putin as “the national leader” and pragmatic politics introduced by him as “the president”.</p></abstract>

In this paper, we borrow the dramaturgical analysis from sociologists and use it to analyze how contemporary Russian elites communicate with the public. It is my goal to analyze the performance of the Russian political elite when presenting the changes caused by the worsening Russo-Western relations over the Ukrainian crisis to the domestic audiences, with focus on the impact of sanctions introduced by the Western countries last year. Which strategies, narratives and symbols remain the same and which are adjusted, erased or newly introduced by the political elite when communicating with the public in order to justify the contemporary situation? We will focus especially on two basic components of the narrative: the symbolic level, particularly the use of history, geopolitics and other symbolic topics to frame the current situation; the pragmatic level, especially adjustment of current strategies and introduction of new plans and partners who will help to manage the new situation. As we will clarify later, our analysis will focus on symbolic arguments used by Vladimir Putin as “the national leader” and pragmatic politics introduced by him as “the president”.

Sanctions in Russian Political Narrative

Lecturer and Researcher at the Department of Political Science and International Relations at University of West Bohemia in Pilsen, Czech Republic

Politics in Central Europe

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

{"article-title":"Sanctions in Russian Political Narrative"}

In this paper, we borrow the dramaturgical analysis from sociologists and use it to analyze how contemporary Russian elites communicate with the public. It is...

Sanctions in Russian Political Narrative

Online veröffentlicht: 24. Juni 2016

Seitenbereich: 111 - 145

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pce-2016-0007

Schlüsselwörter
dramaturgical analysis, Russian foreign policy, sanctions, Ukrainian crisis, Russian politics

© 2016

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Sanctions in Russian Political Narrative

Online veröffentlicht: 24. Juni 2016

Seitenbereich: 111 - 145

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pce-2016-0007

Schlüsselwörterdramaturgical analysis, Russian foreign policy, sanctions, Ukrainian crisis, Russian politics

© 2016

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Schlüsselwörter
dramaturgical analysis, Russian foreign policy, sanctions, Ukrainian crisis, Russian politics