Comparing three scheduling methods using BIM models in the Last Planner System

Agrama, F. A. E. M. (2011). Linear projects scheduling using spreadsheets features. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 50(2), pp. 179–185.AgramaF. A. E. M.2011Linear projects scheduling using spreadsheets featuresAlexandria Engineering Journal50217918510.1016/j.aej.2011.01.018Search in Google Scholar

Ballard, G. (2000). The last planner system of production control, Thesis. The University of Birmingham.BallardG.2000The last planner system of production control, ThesisThe University of BirminghamSearch in Google Scholar

Ballard, G., & Tommelein, I. (2016). Current process benchmark for the last planner system. Lean Construction Journal, 2016 Issue, pp. 57–89.BallardG.TommeleinI.2016Current process benchmark for the last planner systemLean Construction Journal2016Issue5789Search in Google Scholar

Bokor, O., & Hajdu, M. (2015). Investigation of critical activities in a network with point-to-point relations. Procedia Engineering, 123, pp. 198–207.BokorO.HajduM.2015Investigation of critical activities in a network with point-to-point relationsProcedia Engineering12319820710.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.078Search in Google Scholar

Brioso, X. (2011). Applying Lean Construction to Loss Control. School of Civil Engineering, Engineering Department, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Lima, pp. 1–11.BriosoX.2011Applying Lean Construction to Loss ControlSchool of Civil Engineering, Engineering Department, Pontifical Catholic University of PeruLima111Search in Google Scholar

Brioso, X. (2015a). Integrating ISO 21500 guidance on project management, lean construction and PMBOK. Procedia Engineering, 123, pp. 76–84.BriosoX.2015aIntegrating ISO 21500 guidance on project management, lean construction and PMBOKProcedia Engineering123768410.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.060Search in Google Scholar

Brioso, X. (2015b). Teaching lean construction: Pontifical Catholic University of Peru training course in lean project & construction management. Procedia Engineering, 123, pp. 85–93.BriosoX.2015bTeaching lean construction: Pontifical Catholic University of Peru training course in lean project & construction managementProcedia Engineering123859310.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.062Search in Google Scholar

Brioso, X., Humero, A., & Calampa, S. (2016). Comparing point-to-point precedence relations and location-based management system in last planner system: A housing project of highly repetitive processes case study. Procedia Engineering, 164(June), pp. 12–19.BriosoX.HumeroA.CalampaS.2016Comparing point-to-point precedence relations and location-based management system in last planner system: A housing project of highly repetitive processes case studyProcedia Engineering164June121910.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.586Search in Google Scholar

Dave, B., Hämäläinen, J.-P., Kemmer, S., Koskela, L., & Koskenvesa, A. (2015). Suggestions to improve lean construction planning. In: 23rd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Perth, Australia, pp. 193–202.DaveB.HämäläinenJ.-P.KemmerS.KoskelaL.KoskenvesaA.2015Suggestions to improve lean construction planningIn:23rd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean ConstructionPerth, Australia193202Search in Google Scholar

Frandson, A., Berghede, K., & Tommelein, I. D. (2013). Takt time planning for construction of exterior cladding. In: Formoso, C.T., & Tzortzopoulos, P. (eds.), 21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Fortaleza, Brazil, 31–2 Aug 2013, pp. 527–536.FrandsonA.BerghedeK.TommeleinI. D.2013Takt time planning for construction of exterior claddingIn:FormosoC.T.TzortzopoulosP.(eds.)21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean ConstructionFortaleza, Brazil31–2 Aug 2013527536Search in Google Scholar

Hajdu, M. (2015). Point-to-point versus traditional precedence relations for modeling activity overlapping. Procedia Engineering, 123, pp. 208–215.HajduM.2015Point-to-point versus traditional precedence relations for modeling activity overlappingProcedia Engineering12320821510.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.079Search in Google Scholar

Hajdu, M. (2016). PDM time analysis with continuous and point-to-point relations: Calculations using an artificial example. Procedia Engineering, 164(June), pp. 57–67.HajduM.2016PDM time analysis with continuous and point-to-point relations: Calculations using an artificial exampleProcedia Engineering164June576710.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.592Search in Google Scholar

Kenley, R., & Seppänen, O. (2010). Location-based management system for construction: Planning, scheduling, and control. Spon Press, London and New York, pp. 125–144.KenleyR.SeppänenO.2010Location-based management system for construction: Planning, scheduling, and controlSpon PressLondon and New York125144Search in Google Scholar

Koskela, L. (1992). Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction, CIFE Technical Report #72, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, USA, pp. 30–37.KoskelaL.1992Application of the New Production Philosophy to ConstructionCIFE Technical Report #72Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford UniversityStanford, USA3037Search in Google Scholar

Lean Construction Institute. (2016). Available at http://www.leanconstruction.org/.Lean Construction Institute2016Available at http://www.leanconstruction.org/.Search in Google Scholar

Levy, F. K., Thompson, G. L., & Wiest, J. D. (1963). Introduction to the critical path method. In: Muth, G. L., & Thompson, J. F. (eds.), Industrial Scheduling. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (20), pp. 193–202.LevyF. K.ThompsonG. L.WiestJ. D.1963Introduction to the critical path methodInMuthG. L.ThompsonJ. F.(eds.)Industrial SchedulingPrentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs, NJ(20)193202Search in Google Scholar

Linnik, M., Berghede, K., & Ballard, G. (2013). An experiment in takt time planning applied to non-repetitive work. In: Formoso, C. T., & Tzortzopoulos, P. (eds.), 21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 31–2 Aug 2013, Fortaleza, Brazil, pp. 546–555.LinnikM.BerghedeK.BallardG.2013An experiment in takt time planning applied to non-repetitive workIn:FormosoC. T.TzortzopoulosP.(eds.)21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction31–2 Aug 2013Fortaleza, Brazil546555Search in Google Scholar

Murguía, D., Brioso, X., & Pimentel, A. (2016). Applying lean techniques to improve performance in the finishing phase of a residential building. In: International Group for Lean Construction, Boston, USA, pp. 43–52.MurguíaD.BriosoX.PimentelA.2016Applying lean techniques to improve performance in the finishing phase of a residential buildingIn:International Group for Lean ConstructionBoston, USA4352Search in Google Scholar

Seppänen, O., Ballard, G., & Pesonen, S. (2010). The combination of last planner system and location-based management system. Lean Construction Journal, 2010 Issue, pp. 43–54.SeppänenO.BallardG.PesonenS.2010The combination of last planner system and location-based management systemLean Construction Journal2010Issue4354Search in Google Scholar

Seppänen, O., Evinger, J., & Mouflard, C. (2013). Comparison of LBMS schedule forecasts to actual progress. In: 21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2013 Fortaleza, Brazil, pp. 506–515.SeppänenO.EvingerJ.MouflardC.2013Comparison of LBMS schedule forecasts to actual progressIn21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction 2013 FortalezaBrazil506515Search in Google Scholar

Tommelein, I. D. (2017). Collaborative takt time planning of nonrepetitive work. In: Proceedings of 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, (July), Heraklion, Greece, 9–12 Jul 2017, pp. 745–752.TommeleinI. D.2017Collaborative takt time planning of nonrepetitive workIn:Proceedings of 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, (July)Heraklion, Greece9–12 Jul 2017745752Search in Google Scholar