Bjuvberg, Jan. 2015. ”Rättskällevärdet av OECD:s modellavtal – synen på förhållandet mellan modellavtalet och Wienkonventionen i litteraturen”. Svensk skattetidning (2015:2): 111–130, cited as “Bjuvberg, 2015a”BjuvbergJan2015”Rättskällevärdet av OECD:s modellavtal – synen på förhållandet mellan modellavtalet och Wienkonventionen i litteraturen”2015:2111130cited as “Bjuvberg, 2015a”Search in Google Scholar
Bjuvberg, Jan. 2015. ”Betydelsen av OECD:s modellavtal vid tolkningen av skatteavtal – några typfall”. Svensk Skattetidning (2015:5): 427–443, cited as “Bjuvberg, 2015b”BjuvbergJan2015”Betydelsen av OECD:s modellavtal vid tolkningen av skatteavtal – några typfall”20155427443cited as “Bjuvberg, 2015b”Search in Google Scholar
Bjørge, Eirik. 2014. The Evolutionary Interpretation of TreatiesBjørgeEirik201410.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716143.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1992. Understanding Utterances. Introduction to PragmaticsBlakemoreDiane1992Search in Google Scholar
Cejie, Katia. 2010. Utflyttningsbeskattning av kapitalökningarCejieKatia2010Search in Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Mattias. 2003. ”Vilket rättskällevärde har kommentarerna till OECD:s modellavtal?”. In Festskrift till Gustav Lindencrona, edited by Arvidsson, Richard et al., 137–155DahlbergMattiasArvidssonRichard2003”Vilket rättskällevärde har kommentarerna till OECD:s modellavtal?”137155Search in Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Mattias. 2014. Internationell beskattning, 4th editionDahlbergMattias20144th editionSearch in Google Scholar
Dascal, Marcelo and Wróblewski, Jerzy. 1988. ”Transparency and Doubt: Understanding and Interpretation in Pragmatics and in Law”, Law and Philosophy, 7: 203–205DascalMarceloWróblewskiJerzy1988”Transparency and Doubt: Understanding and Interpretation in Pragmatics and in Law”720320510.1007/BF00144156Search in Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn. 1996. “Some Observations on the Inter-Temporal Rule in International Law”. In Essays in Honour of Krzystof Skubiszewski, edited by Makarczyk, Jerzy, 173–181HigginsRosalynMakarczykJerzy1996“Some Observations on the Inter-Temporal Rule in International Law”17318110.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262350.003.0056Search in Google Scholar
Hilling, Maria. 2014. “Skatteavtalstolkning enligt svensk rätt”, Svensk skattetidning, 2014: 322–340HillingMaria2014“Skatteavtalstolkning enligt svensk rätt”2014322340Search in Google Scholar
Kleist, David. 2012. Methods for the Elimination of Double Taxation under Double Taxation TreatiesKleistDavid2012Search in Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf. 2007. On the Interpretation of Treaties. The Modern International Law as Expressed in the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, cited as “Linderfalk, 2007a”LinderfalkUlf20072007a”10.1007/978-1-4020-6362-6Search in Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf. 2007. “Is the Hierarchical Structure of Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention Real or Not? Interpreting the Rules of Interpretation”. Netherlands International Law Review, 65: 133– 154, cited as “Linderfalk, 2007b”LinderfalkUlf2007“Is the Hierarchical Structure of Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention Real or Not? Interpreting the Rules of Interpretation”65133154cited as “Linderfalk, 2007b”10.1017/S0165070X07001337Search in Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf. 2008. “Who are ‘the parties’? Article 31 § 3(c) of the 1969 Vienna Convention, and the ‘Principle of Systemic Integration’ Revisited”. Netherlands International Law Review, 55: 343– 364, cited as “Linderfalk, 2008a”LinderfalkUlf2008“Who are ‘the parties’? Article 31 § 3(c) of the 1969 Vienna Convention, and the ‘Principle of Systemic Integration’ Revisited”55343364cited as “Linderfalk, 2008a”10.1017/S0165070X08003434Search in Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf. 2008. “Doing the Right Thing for the Right Reason: Why Dynamic or Static Approaches Should be Taken in the Interpretation of Treaties”. International Community Law Review, 10: 109–141, cited as “Linderfalk, 2008b”LinderfalkUlf2008“Doing the Right Thing for the Right Reason: Why Dynamic or Static Approaches Should be Taken in the Interpretation of Treaties”10109141cited as “Linderfalk, 2008b”10.1163/187197308X311272Search in Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf. 2013. ”Spyridon Roussalis v. Romania: Investor Consent to ICSID Arbitration, and the Limits of Treaty Interpretation”. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 62: 241–250LinderfalkUlf2013”Spyridon Roussalis v. Romania: Investor Consent to ICSID Arbitration, and the Limits of Treaty Interpretation”6224125010.1017/S0020589312000516Search in Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf. 2014. “The Concept of Treaty Abuse: On the Exercise of Legal Discretion”, posted at the SSRN, on 17 November 2014. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2526051, cited as “Linderfalk 2014a”LinderfalkUlf2014“The Concept of Treaty Abuse: On the Exercise of Legal Discretion”, posted at the SSRN, on 17 November 2014. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2526051, cited as “Linderfalk 2014a”10.2139/ssrn.2526051Search in Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf. 2014. ”AJIL Symposium: Is the Vienna Convention Hostile to Drafting History? A Response to Julian Davis Mortenson, Part 2”, posted at opiniojuris, on 5 February 2014. Available at: http://opiniojuris.org, cited as “Linderfalk 2014b”LinderfalkUlf2014”AJIL Symposium: Is the Vienna Convention Hostile to Drafting History? A Response to Julian Davis Mortenson, Part 2”, posted at opiniojuris, on 5 February 2014. Available at: http://opiniojuris.org, cited as “Linderfalk 2014b”10.2139/ssrn.2389251Search in Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf and Hilling, Maria. 2015 “The Use of OECD Commentaries as Interpretative Aids: The Static/Ambulatory-Approaches Debate Considered from the Perspective of International Law”. Nordic Tax Journal (2015:1), 34–59LinderfalkUlfHillingMaria2015“The Use of OECD Commentaries as Interpretative Aids: The Static/Ambulatory-Approaches Debate Considered from the Perspective of International Law”20151345910.1515/ntaxj-2015-0003Search in Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf. 2015. ”Is Treaty Interpretation an Art or a Science? International Law and Rational Decision Making”. European Journal of International Law, 26: 169–189LinderfalkUlf2015”Is Treaty Interpretation an Art or a Science? International Law and Rational Decision Making”2616918910.1093/ejil/chv008Search in Google Scholar
McDade, Paul. 1986. “The Effect of Article 4 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969”. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 35: 499–511McDadePaul1986“The Effect of Article 4 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969”3549951110.1093/iclqaj/35.3.499Search in Google Scholar
McRae, Donald. 1979. ”The Legal Effect of Interpretative Declarations”. British Yearbook of International Law, 49: 155–173McRaeDonald1979”The Legal Effect of Interpretative Declarations”4915517310.1093/bybil/49.1.155Search in Google Scholar
Oppenheim’s International Law. 1992. Edited by Jennings, Robert and Watts, Arthur, Vol. 1, 9th editionJennings1992Vol 19th editionSearch in Google Scholar
Sallander, Ann-Sophie. 2013. Ömsesidiga överenskommelser enligt skatteavtalSallanderAnn-Sophie2013Search in Google Scholar
Strömholm, Stig. 1996. Rätt, Rättskällor och rättstillämpning, 5th editionStrömholmStig19965th editionSearch in Google Scholar
Thirlway, Hugh. 1972. International Customary Law and CodificationThirlwayHugh1972Search in Google Scholar
Villiger, Mark. 1986. Customary International Law and TreatiesVilligerMark1986Search in Google Scholar
Waldock, Humphrey. 1981. “The Evolution of Human Rights Concepts and the Application of the European Convention on Human Rights”. In Mélanges Offert à Paul Reuter, edited by Gross, André, 535–547WaldockHumphreyGrossAndré1981“The Evolution of Human Rights Concepts and the Application of the European Convention on Human Rights”535547Search in Google Scholar