[Allan, Percy. 2003. “Why Smaller Councils Make Sense.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 62, 74–81.]Search in Google Scholar
[Alt, James E. 1971. “Some Social and Political Correlates of County Borough Expenditures.” British Journal of Political Science 1, 49–62.]Search in Google Scholar
[Appelbaum, Richard P. and Ross Follett. 1978. “Size, Growth, and Urban Life A Study of Medium-Sized American Cities.” Urban Affairs Review 14, 139–168.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baldersheim, Harald and Lawrence Rose. 2008. A Comparative Analysis of Territorial Choice in Europe. Oslo: Political Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blom-Hansen, Jens. 2004. “Stordriftsfordele i den kommunale serviceproduktion? Skoleområdet som eksempel.” In Jens Blom-Hansen, Asbjørn Sonne Norgaard and Thomas Pallesen (eds). Politisk Ukorrekt. Århus Universitetsforlag, 250–274.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bours, Adriann. 1993. “Management, Tiers, Size and Amalgamations of Local Government.” In Robert Bennett (ed.). Local Government in the New Europe. London: Belhaven, 130–163.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bovaird, Tony and Elke Löffler. 2003. “Evaluating the Quality of Public Governance: Indicators, Models and Methodologies.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 69, 313–328.]Search in Google Scholar
[Boyne, A. George. 1995. “Population Size and Economies of Scale in Local Government.” Policy and Politics 23, 213–222.]Search in Google Scholar
[Byrnes, Joel and Bryan Dollery. 2002. “Do Economies of Scale Exist in Australian Local Government? A Review of the Research Evidence.” Urban Policy and Research 20, 391–414.]Search in Google Scholar
[Coase, H. Ronald. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica 4, 386–405.]Search in Google Scholar
[Czech Statistical Office. 2016. Malý lexikon obcí ČR 2015. Available at https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/maly-lexikon-obci-ceske-republiky-2015 (last accessed 20 June 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahl, R. Allan and Edward R. Tufte. 1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Davies, Bleddyn. 1971. Variations in Services for the Aged: A Causal Analysis (No. 40). London: G. Bell and Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Denters, Bas. 2002. “Size and Political Trust: Evidence from Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, and the United Kingdom.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 20, 793–812.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dollery, Bryan, Joel Byrnes and Lin Crase. 2008. “Australian Local Government Amalgamation: A Conceptual of Analysis Population Size and Scale Economies in Municipal Service Provision.” Australasian Journal of Regional Studies 14, 167.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dollery, Bryan, and Euan Fleming. 2006. “A Conceptual Note on Scale Economies, Size Economies and Scope Economies in Australian Local Government.” Urban Policy and Research 24, 271–282.]Search in Google Scholar
[Drew, Joseph, Andy Kortt and Bryan Dollery. 2012. “Economies of Scale and Local Government Expenditure: Evidence from Australia.” Administration & Society 20, 1–22.]Search in Google Scholar
[Faulk, Dagney Gail and Joel Hicks. 2011. Local Government Consolidation in the United States. New York: Cambria Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Foster, D. Christopher, Richard Jackman and Morris Perlman. 1980. Local Government Finance in a Unitary State. London: George Allen and Unwin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fox, William F. and Tami Gurley-Calvez. 2006. “Will Consolidation Improve Sub-National Governments?” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3913.10.1596/1813-9450-3913]Search in Google Scholar
[Galvasová, Iveta et al. 2007. Identifikace kompetencí zatěžujících výkon veřejné správy se zvláštním přihlédnutím k malým obcím. Available at http://www.mvcr.cz/clanek/identifikace-kompetenci-zatezujicich-vykon-verejne-spravy-se-zvlastnim-prihlednutim-k-malym-obcim-1-etapa.aspx (ast accessed 15 August 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Goldsmith, M. and Lawrence E. Rose. 2000. “Constituency, Size and Electoral Politics: A Comparison of Patterns at Local Elections in Norway and the UK.” Paper presented at the IPSA 18th World Congress, Quebec, Canada.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hampl, Martin and Jan Müller. 1998. “Jsou obce v České republice příliš malé.” Geografie – Sborník ČGS 103, 1–12.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hansen, Sune Welling, Kurt Houlberg and Lene Holm Pedersen. 2014. “Do Municipal Mergers Improve Fiscal Outcomes?” Scandinavian Political Studies 37, 196–214.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hertzog, Robert. 2010. “Inter-municipal co-operation: a viable alternative to territorial amalgamation?” In Pawel Swianiewicz (ed.). Territorial Consolidation Reforms in Europe. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative, 289–312.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hirsch, Z. Werner. 1959. “Expenditure Implications of Metropolitan Growth and Consolidation.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 1959, 232–241.]Search in Google Scholar
[Holcombe, G. Randall and DeEdgra W. Williams. 2009. “Are there Economies of Scale in Municipal Government Expenditures?” Public Finance and Management 9, 416.]Search in Google Scholar
[Houlberg, Kurt. 1995. “Kommunale stordriftsfordele: Myte eller realitet?” Nordisk administrativt tidsskrift 76, 65–88.]Search in Google Scholar
[Houlberg, Kurt. 2010. “Municipal Size, Economy, and Democracy.” In Pawel Swianiewicz (ed.). Territorial Consolidation Reforms in Europe. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative, 309–331.]Search in Google Scholar
[Houlberg, Kurt and I. L. Møller. 2001. “Kommunestørrelse og udgift sniveau: Er der en sammenhæng?” In R. Norstrand and N. Groes (eds). Kommunestyrets fremtid. København: Akf Forlaget, 185–198.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hutcheson, John D. and James E. Prather. 1979. “Economy of Scale or Bureaucratic Entropy? Implications for Metropolitan Governmental Reorganization.” Urban Affairs Review 15, 164–182.]Search in Google Scholar
[Keating, Michael. 1995. “Size, Efficiency and Democracy: Consolidation, Fragmentation and Public Choice.” In D. Judge, G. Stoker. and H. Wollman (eds). Theories of Urban Politics. London: Sage, 117–134.]Search in Google Scholar
[King, N. David. 1984. Fiscal Tiers: The Economics of Multi-Level Government. London: Allen & Unwin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kushner, Joseph and David Siegel. 2003. “Citizens’ Attitudes toward Municipal Amalgamation in Three Ontario Municipalities.” Canadian Journal of Regional Science 26, 49–60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Löffler, Elke. 2002. “Defining and Measuring Quality in Public Administration.” In Joanne Caddy and Mirko Vintar (ed.). Building Better Quality Administration for the Public: Case Studies from Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: Nispacee 15–34.]Search in Google Scholar
[Montén, Anna and Christian Thater. 2011. “Determinants of Efficiency in Child-Care Provision.” FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis 67, 378–403.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mouritzen, Poul Erik. 1989. “City Size and Citizens’ Satisfaction: Two Competing Theories Revisited.” European Journal of Political Research 17, 661–688.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mouritzen, Poul Erik. 1991. Den politiske cyklus. Aarhus: Politica.]Search in Google Scholar
[Musgrave, Richard Abel and Peggy B. Musgrave. 1989. Public Finance in Theory and Practice. New York: McGraw/Hill, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Newton, Kenneth. 1982. “Is Small Really so Beautiful? Is Big Really so Ugly? Size, Effectiveness, and Democracy in Local Government.” Political Studies 30, 190–206.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nielsen, Hans Jorgen. 1981. “Size and Evaluation of Government: Danish Attitudes towards Politics at Multiple Levels of Government.” European Journal of Political Research 9, 47–60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oates, Wallace E. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. Chicago: Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oates, Wallace E. 1999. “An Essay on Fiscal Federalism.” Journal of Economic Literature 37, 1120–1149.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2004. OECD territorial reviews: The Czech Republic 2004. Available at http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/urban-rural-and-regional-development/oecd-territorial-reviews-czech-republic-2004_9789264106413-en (last accessed 27 June 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Pudil, Pavel et al. 2004. Zdanění a efektivnost. Praha: Eurolex Bohemia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rose, Lawrence E. 2002. “Municipal Size and Local Nonelectoral Participation: Findings from Denmark, the Netherlands, and Norway.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 20, 829–851.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sawyer, M. C. 1991. The Economics of Industries and Firms: Theories, Evidence and Policy. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schofield, John A. 1978. “Determinants of Urban Service Expenditures: Fire and Social Services.” Local Government Studies 4, 65–80.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sharpe, J. 1995. “Local Government: Size, Efficiency and Citizen Participation.” In Michael Martins (ed.). The Size of Municipalities, Efficiency and Citizen Participation. Strasbourg: Local and Regional Authorities in Europe, Council of Europe, 56.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stigler, George J. 1958. “Economies of Scale.” The Journal of Political Economy 1958, 54.]Search in Google Scholar
[Soukopová, Jana. 2016. Efektivnost výdajů obcí na nakládání s odpady. Habilitation thesis, Masaryk University, Brno.]Search in Google Scholar
[Soukopová, Jana et al. 2014. “Municipality Size and Local Public Services: Do Economies of Scale Exist?” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 7, 151–171.]Search in Google Scholar
[Soukopová, Jana et al. 2016. “Factors Influencing the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Municipal Waste Management Expenditure.” Lex Localis 14, 359.]Search in Google Scholar
[Swianiewicz, Pawel. 2002. “Size of Local Government, Local Democracy and Efficiency in Delivery of Local Services: International Context and Theoretical Framework.” In Pawel Swianiewicz (ed.). Consolidation or Fragmentation: The Size of Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative, 1–29.]Search in Google Scholar
[Swianiewicz, Pawel. 2010. “If Territorial Fragmentation is a Problem, is Amalgamation a Solution? An East European Perspective.” Local Government Studies 36, 183–203.]Search in Google Scholar
[Swianiewicz, Pawel. 2014. “An Empirical Typology of Local Government Systems in Eastern Europe.” Local Government Studies 40, 292–311.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tiebout, Charles M. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” The Journal of Political Economy 64, 416–424.]Search in Google Scholar
