[Androjna, Vilko and Erik Kerševan. 2006. Upravno procesno pravo [Administrative Procedural Law]. Ljubljana: GV.]Search in Google Scholar
[Banisar, David. 2006. Freedom of Information around the World 2006. Available at http://www.humanrightsinitiative.org/programs/ai/rti/international/laws_papers/intl/global_foi_survey_2006.pdf (last accessed 19 October 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Bevir, Mark (ed.). 2011. The SAGE Handbook of Governance. Los Angeles: Sage.10.4135/9781446200964]Search in Google Scholar
[Bousta, Rhita. 2013. “Who Said There is a ‘Right to Good Administration ?’ A Critical Analysis of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.” European Public Law 19(3), 481 – 488.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brandsma, Gijs Jan, Deidre Curtin, Bettina Leufgen and Albert Meijer. 2010. “Studying Open Government in the EU: From Normative Debates to Empirical Fact-Finding.” ECPR / SGEU conference, Oporto, 24 – 26 June 2010. Available at http://www.jhubc.it/ecpr-porto/virtualpaperroom/035.pdf (last accessed 19 October 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Bugarič, Bojan. 2003. “Odprta javna uprava” [Open Public Administration]. Zbornik znanstvenih razprav 63, 119 – 156.]Search in Google Scholar
[Buijze, Anoeska. 2013. “The Six Faces of Transparency.” EGPA conference, Edinburgh, 11 – 13 September 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cardona, Francisco P. and Annke Freibert. 2007. “The European Administrative Space and Sigma Assessments of EU Candidate Countries.” Croatian Public Administration 7(1), 51 – 59.]Search in Google Scholar
[Galleta, Diana-Urania, Herwig C. H. Hofmann, Oriol Mir Puigpelat and Jacques Ziller. 2015. “The General Principles of EU Administrative Procedural Law. Brussels: European Parliament.” Available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2015/519224/IPOL_IDA(2015)519224_EN.pdf (last accessed 19 October 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Hofmann, Herwig C. H., Jens-Peter Schneider and Jacques Ziller (eds). 2014. The ReNEUAL Model Rules. ReNEUAL. Available at www.reneual.eu (last accessed 19 October 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Koprić, Ivan. 2011. “Contemporary Croatian Public Administration on the Reform Waves.” Yearbook of the Croatian Academy of Legal Sciences 2(1), 1 – 39.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koprić, Ivan, Gordana Marčetić, Anamarija Musa, Vedran Đulabić and Goranka Lalić Novak. 2014. Upravna znanost [Administrative Science]. Zagreb: Faculty of Law.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kovač, Polonca. 2012. “Ethics of Officials in the Context of (Slovene) Good Administration.” The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 5(1), 23 – 53.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kovač, Polonca. 2015. “Contemporary Challenges of Access to Information in Public Governance in South Eastern Europe.” Lex Localis 13(2), 185 – 204. Doi:10.4335/13.2.185–204(2015) (last accessed 19 October 2016).10.4335/13.2.185-204(2015)]Search in Google Scholar
[Kovač, Polonca, Tomaževič, Nina, Leben, Anamarija and Aleksander Aristovnik. 2016. “Reforming public administration in Slovenia: between theory and practice of good governance and good administration.” International Journal of Public Policy, 12 (3 / 4 / 5 / 6), 130 – 148. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJPP.2016.10000529 (last accessed 19 October 2016).10.1504/IJPP.2016.10000529]Search in Google Scholar
[Kovač, Polonca and Gregor Virant (eds). 2011. Razvoj slovenske javne uprave 1991 – 2011 [Development of Slovene Public Administration 1991 – 2011]. Ljubljana: Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Musa, Anamarija. 2013. “Transparentnost – zašto i kako ?” [Transparency – Why and How ?]. In Musa, Anamarija (ed.). 5. Forum za javno upravu. Zagreb: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Institut for Public Administration, 7 – 26. Available at http://www.iju.hr/page15/files/5_FORUM_stranice.pdf (last accessed 19 October 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Nehl, Hanns Peter. 1999. Principles of Administrative Procedure in EC Law. Oxford: Hart.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 1998. Preparing Public Administrations for the European Administrative Space. SIGMA Papers 23. Paris: OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 1999. European Principles for Public Administration. SIGMA Papers 27. Paris: OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2004. Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris: OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2014. The Principles of Public Administration. Available at http://www.sigmaweb.org/publications/Principles-Public-Administration-Nov2014.pdf (last accessed 19 October 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2015. G20 / OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris: OECD. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264236882-en (last accessed 19 October 2016).10.1787/9789264236882-en]Search in Google Scholar
[Pavčnik, Marijan. 2007. Teorija prava [Theory of Law]. Ljubljana: Cankarjeva založba.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rose-Ackerman, Susan and Peter L. Lindseth (eds). 2010. Comparative Administrative Law. Cheltenham, Northampton: Elgar.10.4337/9781849808101]Search in Google Scholar
[Rusch, Wolfgang. 2014. “Citizens First: Modernisation of the System of Administrative Procedures in South-Eastern Europe.” Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 14(1), 189 – 228.]Search in Google Scholar
[Savino, Mario. 2010. The Right to Open Public Administration in Europe: Emerging Legal Standards. SIGMA Papers 46. Paris: OECD. Available at http://www.epsa2011.eu/files/Themes_2011/OECD%20Administrative%20Transparency%201010.pdf (last accessed 19 October 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Sever, Tina, Iztok Rakar and Polonca Kovač. 2014. “Protecting Human Rights through Fundamental Principles of Administrative Procedures in Eastern Europe.” Danube 5(4), 249 – 275.]Search in Google Scholar
[Transparency International Slovenija (TIS). 2015. Ali so inšpekcijski postopki res transparentni in učinkoviti ? [Are inspection procedures really transparent and efficient ?]. Ljubljana: TIS. Available at http://issuu.com/tislovenia/docs/pp_inspekcije/1?e=14269436/31675245 (last accessed 19 October 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Trpin, Gorazd. 2008. “The Process of Communication between Citizens and Public Authority Bodies – a New Concept of General Administrative Procedure.” Lex Localis 6(2), 153 – 169.]Search in Google Scholar
[Venice Commission. 2011. Stocktaking on the Notion of Good Governance and Good Administration. Study 470 / 2008, CDL-AD(2001)009.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vidačak, Igor and Marina Škrabalo. 2014. “Exploring the Effects of Europeanization on the Openness of Public Administration in Croatia.” Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 14(1), 149 – 187.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vintar, Mirko, Alan Rosenbaum, Gyorgy Jenei and Wolfgang Drechsler (eds). 2013. The Past, Present and the Future of Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPAcee.]Search in Google Scholar
