[Bort, E., R. McAlpine and G. Morgan. 2012. The Silent Crisis: Failure and Revival in Local Democracy in Scotland. Glasgow: The Jimmy Reid Foundation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bouckaert, G. and J. Halligan. 2008. Managing Performance: International Comparisons. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203935958]Search in Google Scholar
[Bouckaert, G. and W. Van Dooren. 2009. “Performance Measurement and Management in Public Sector Organizations.” In T. Bovaird and E. Loffl er (eds). Public Management and Governance. London: Routledge. 151 - 164.10.4324/9780203030806]Search in Google Scholar
[Bourdieu, P. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Checkland, P. 1980. “The Systems Movement and the ‘Failure’ of Management Science.” Cybernetics and Systems 11(4), 317 - 324.]Search in Google Scholar
[Choo, C. W. 1998. The Knowing Organization: How Organizations Use Information to Construct Meaning, Create Knowledge, and Make Decisions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahler-Larsen, P. 2006. “Evaluation aft er Disenchantment ? Five Issues Shaping the Role of Evaluation in Society.” In I. F. Shaw et al. (eds). The SAGE Handbook of Evaluation. Th ousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 141 - 160.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferlie, E., L. Fitzgerald, G. McGivern, S. Dopson and C. Bennett. 2011. “Public Policy Networks and ‘Wicked Problems’: A Nascent Solution ?” Public Administration 89(2), 307 - 324.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fischer, F. 1995. Evaluating Public Policy. New York: Nelson-Hall Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Greve, C. 2015. “Ideas in Public Management Reform for the 2010s: Digitalization, Value Creation and Involvement.” Public Organization Review 15(1), 49 - 65.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamel, G. and L. Välikangas. 2003. “The Quest for Resilience.” Harvard Business Review 81(9), 52 - 63.]Search in Google Scholar
[Head, B. W. 2008. “Wicked Policy Problems.” Public Policy 3(2), 101 - 118.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hedström, P. and R. Swedberg (eds). 1998. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511663901]Search in Google Scholar
[Heinrich, C. J. 1999. “Do Government Bureaucrats Make Eff ective Use of Performance Management Information ?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9(3), 363 - 394.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hernes, T. 2014. A Process Theory of Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695072.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Hodges, R. 2012. “Joined-Up Government and the Challenges to Accounting and Accountability Researchers.” Financial Accountability & Management 28(1), 26 - 51.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaivo-oja, J., P. Virtanen, H. Jalonen and J. Stenvall. 2015. The Eff ects of the Internet of Th ings and Big Data to Organizations and their Knowledge Management Practices. KMO proceedings from the 2015 KMO Conference. Maribor: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-21009-4_38]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaufmann, X.-F. 1987. “Prevention and Intervention in the Analytical Perspective of Guidance.” In K. Hurrelmann et al. (eds). Social Intervention: Chances and Constraints. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 3 - 20.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koppell, J. G. S. 2005. “Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of ‘Multiple Accountabilities Disorder’.” Public Administration Review 65(1), 94 - 108.]Search in Google Scholar
[McManus, S., E. Seville, J. Vargo and D. Brunsdon. 2008. “Facilitated Process for Improving Organizational Resilience.” Natural Hazards Review 9(2), 81 - 90.]Search in Google Scholar
[March, J. G. 1978. “Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity and the Engineering of Choice.” Bell Journal of Economics 9(2), 587 - 608.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moran, P. 2005. “Structural vs. Relational Embeddedness: Social Capital and Managerial Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 26(12), 1129 - 1151.]Search in Google Scholar
[Neely, A., M. Kennerly and A. Walters. 2006. Performance Measurement and Management: Public and Private. Cranfi eld: Cranfi eld School of Management.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi. 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1016/0024-6301(96)81509-3]Search in Google Scholar
[North, D.C. 2005. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Patton, M. Q. 1997. Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text. Th ousand Oaks: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pawson, R. and N. Tilley. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schillemans, T. 2011 “Does Horizontal Accountability Work ? Evaluating Potential Remedies for the Accountability Defi cit of Agencies.” Administration & Society 43(3), 387 - 416.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scriven, M. 1991. Evaluation Thesaurus. Th ousand Oaks: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tsoukas, H. 2005. Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vakkuri, J. 2013. “Interpretive Schemes in Public Sector Performance: Measurements Creating Managerial Problems in Local Government.” International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management 2(2), 156 - 174.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vakkuri, J. 2010. “Struggling with Ambiguity: Public Managers as Users of NPMOriented Management Instruments.” Public Administration 88(4), 999 - 1024. Van Helden, G. J., A. Johnsen and J. Vakkuri. 2012. “Evaluating Public Sector Performance Management: The Life Cycle Approach.” Evaluation 18(2), 159 - 175.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vedung, E. 1997. Public Policy and Program Evaluation. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Virtanen, P. and J. Stenvall. 2014. Älykäs julkinen organisaatio [An intelligent public organization]. Helsinki: Tietosanoma.]Search in Google Scholar
[Virtanen, P. and P. Uusikyla. 2004. “Exploring the Missing Links between Cause and Eff ect: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Micro-Macro Conversions in Programme Evaluation.” Evaluation 10(1), 77 - 91.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weber, E. P. and A. N. Khademian. 2008. “Wicked Problems, Knowledge Challenges, and Collaborative Capacity Builders in Network Settings.” Public Administration Review 68(2), 334 - 349.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weiss, C. 1998. Evaluation. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wholey, J. S. and H. P. Hatry. 1992. “The Case for Performance Monitoring.” Public Administration Review 52(6), 604 - 610. ]Search in Google Scholar
