1. bookVolumen 62 (2016): Heft 2 (June 2016)
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
2385-8052
Erstveröffentlichung
22 Feb 2015
Erscheinungsweise
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Uneingeschränkter Zugang

The Analysis of Barriers in Succession Processes of Family Business with the Use of Grey Incidence Analysis (Polish Perspective)

Online veröffentlicht: 24 Jun 2016
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 62 (2016) - Heft 2 (June 2016)
Seitenbereich: 33 - 41
Eingereicht: 01 Feb 2016
Akzeptiert: 01 May 2016
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
2385-8052
Erstveröffentlichung
22 Feb 2015
Erscheinungsweise
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch

1. Aldrich, H., & Cliff J. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship, toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 573-596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-910.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9Search in Google Scholar

2. Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. (1992). The client is the expert: A not-knowing approach to therapy. In S. McNamee & K. Gergen (Eds.), Social construction and the therapeutic process. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

3. Arnoff, C. E., McClure, S. L., & Ward, J. L. (2012). Succession in family businesses (Sukcesja w firmach rodzinnych). Kraków: MiP Publishing House.Search in Google Scholar

4. Astrachan, J. H., & Kolenko, T. A. (1994). A neglected factor explaining family business success: Human resource practices. Family Business Review, 7(3), 251-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1994.00251.x10.1111/j.1741-6248.1994.00251.xSearch in Google Scholar

5. Astrachan, J. H., & Shanker, M. C. (2003). Family businesses’ contribution to the U.S. economy: A closer look. Family Business Review, 16(3), 211-219.Search in Google Scholar

6. Barach, J. A., & Ganitsky, J. B. (1995). Successful succession in family business. Family Business Review, 8(2), 131-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1995.00131.x10.1111/j.1741-6248.1995.00131.xSearch in Google Scholar

7. Barnes, L. B. (1988). Incongruent hierarchies: Daughters and younger sons as company CEOs. Family Business Review, 1, 9-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00009.x10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00009.xSearch in Google Scholar

8. Blake, C. G., & Saleh, D. D. (1995). A model of family owned small business performance. Family Business Annual, 1, 22-30.Search in Google Scholar

9. Budge, G. S., & Janoff, R. F. (1991). Succession in women-owned family businesses: A case study. Family Business Review, 4(4), 367-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1991.00367.x10.1111/j.1741-6248.1991.00367.xSearch in Google Scholar

10. Cadieux, L., Lorrain, J., & Hugron, P. (2002). Succession in women owned family businesses: A case study. Family Business Review, 15, 17-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00017.x10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00017.xSearch in Google Scholar

11. Danco, L. (1975). Beyond survival-A business owner’s guide for success. Cleveland, OH: University Press.Search in Google Scholar

12. Davis, J. A. (1982). The influence of life stage on father-son relationships in the family firm (Doctoral dissertation). Harvard Business School.Search in Google Scholar

13. Duh, M. (2003). Family business. Development in strategy management family business (Druzinsko podjetje. Razvoj in razvojni management druzinskego podjetia). MER Evrocenter, Maribor: Publishing House MER.Search in Google Scholar

14. Duh, M., Belak, J., & Milfelner, B. (2010). Core values, culture and ethical climate as constitutional elements of ethical behaviour: Exploring differences between family and non-family enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 473-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0519-910.1007/s10551-010-0519-9Search in Google Scholar

15. Dunk, A., Jimenez, P., Sarotar Zizek, S., Milfelner B., & Kallus, W. K. (2015). Similarities and differences of health-promoting leadership and transformational leadership. Our Economy, 61(4), 3-13.Search in Google Scholar

16. Dyer, G. W. (2006). Examining the “family effect” on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19(4), 253-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00074.x10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00074.xSearch in Google Scholar

17. Dyer, W. G. (2003). The family, the missing variable in organizational research. Entrepreneurship. Theory and Practice, 27(4), 401-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.0001810.1111/1540-8520.00018Search in Google Scholar

18. Ganitsky, J. A., Carson, J. B., & Doochin, B. A. (1988). Entry of the next generation: Strategic challenge for family business. Journal of Small Business Management, 26, 49-56.Search in Google Scholar

19. Handler, W. C., & Kram, K. E. (1989). Succession in family firms: The problem of resistance. Family Business Review, 1, 361-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00361.x10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00361.xSearch in Google Scholar

20. Kedmenec, I., Sebjan, U., & Tomic, P. (2015). Effect of rurality and human capital resources in the entrepreneurial opportunity identification process. Our Economy, 61(2), 35-44.Search in Google Scholar

21. Kepner, E. (1991). The family and the firm: A coevolutionary perspective. Family Business Review, 4, 445-461. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1991.00445.x10.1111/j.1741-6248.1991.00445.xSearch in Google Scholar

22. Klien, S. B. (2000). Family businesses in Germany, Significance and structure. Family Business Review, 6, 769-784. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2000.00157.x10.1111/j.1741-6248.2000.00157.xSearch in Google Scholar

23. Lansberg, I. (1988). The succession conspiracy. Family Business Review, 1, 119-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00119.x10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00119.xSearch in Google Scholar

24. Letonja, M., & Duh, M. (2015). Knowledge transfer in family businesses and its effects on the innovativeness of the next family generation. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, December, 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2015.2510.1057/kmrp.2015.25Search in Google Scholar

25. Litz, R. A. (1995). The family business: Toward definitional clarity. Proceedings of the Academy of Management, 100-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.1995.1753633710.5465/ambpp.1995.17536337Search in Google Scholar

26. Liu, S., & Yi, L. (2006). Grey information: theory and practical applications. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Search in Google Scholar

27. Mierzwiak, R., & Więcek-Janka, E. (2015). The analysis of successors’ competencies in family enterprises with the use of grey system theory. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 5(3), 302-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/GS-03-2015-000710.1108/GS-03-2015-0007Search in Google Scholar

28. Sharma, P. (2002, August). Stakeholder mapping technique: Toward the development of a family firm typology. Paper presented at the 62nd meeting of the Academy of Management, Denver, CO.Search in Google Scholar

29. Swagger, G. (1991). Assessing the successor generation in family businesses. Family Business Review, 4, 397-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1991.00397.x10.1111/j.1741-6248.1991.00397.xSearch in Google Scholar

30. Ward, J. L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar

31. Więcek-Janka, E. (2011). Games and decisions. Poznan: University of Technology Publishing House.Search in Google Scholar

32. Więcek-Janka, E. (2013). The guiding value in the management of family businesses (Wiodące wartości w zarządzaniu przedsiębiorstwami rodzinnymi). Poznan: University of Technology Publishing House.Search in Google Scholar

33. Więcek-Janka, E., Mierzwiak, R. (2015). The analisis of successors’ competencies in family enterprises with the use of grey system theory. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 5 ( 3), 302-312.Search in Google Scholar

34. Vaillant G.E., (2005), Ego Mechanisms of Defense: A Guide for Clinicans and Researchers, American Psychiatic Press, Inc. Washington.Search in Google Scholar

35. Xie, N., & Liu, S. (2009). Research on evaluations of several grey relational models adapt to grey relational axioms. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 20(2), 304-309.Search in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD

Planen Sie Ihre Fernkonferenz mit Scienceendo