The Theoretical Quadruple Helix Model for Digital Inclusion Increase

1. Al-Muwil, A., Weerakkody, V., El-haddadeh, R., Dwivedi, Y. (2019). Balancing Digital-By-Default with Inclusion: A Study of the Factors Influencing E-Inclusion in the UK // Information Systems Frontiers. Vol. 22, pp. 635–659.10.1007/s10796-019-09914-0 Search in Google Scholar

2. Andrade, A. D., Techatassanasoontorn, A. A. (2020). Digital Enforcement: Rethinking the Pursuit of a Digitally - Enabled Society // Inf Syst J. Vol. 31, Issue 1, pp. 184–197.10.1111/isj.12306 Search in Google Scholar

3. Aslam, A., Naveed, A., Shabbir, G. (2020). Is it an Institution, Digital or Social Inclusion That Matters for Inclusive Growth? A Panel Data Analysis // Quality & Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01008-310.1007/s11135-020-01008-3 Search in Google Scholar

4. Bertot, J. C. (2016). Building Digitally Inclusive Communities: The Roles of Public Libraries in Digital Inclusion and Development // ICEGOV ‘15-16, Conference Proceedings. pp. 95–102.10.1145/2910019.2910082 Search in Google Scholar

5. Beyne, W. M. (2018). Digital Inclusion in Library Context: A Perspective from Users with Print Disability // Journal of Web Librarianship. Vol. 12, Issue 2, pp. 121–140. doi.org/10.1080/1 9322909.2018.142765710.1080/19322909.2018.1427657 Search in Google Scholar

6. Bokolo, A. (2021). Exploring Data Driven Initiatives for Smart City Development: Empirical Evidence from Techno-stakeholders’ Perspective // Urban Research & Practice. doi: 10.1080/17535069.2020.186981610.1080/17535069.2020.1869816 Search in Google Scholar

7. Bonina, C., López-Berzosa, D., Scarlata, M. (2020). Social, Commercial, or Both? An Exploratory Study of the Identity Orientation of Digital Social Innovations // Inf Syst J. pp. 1–22.10.1111/isj.12290 Search in Google Scholar

8. Borg, K., Smith, L. (2018). Digital Inclusion and Online Behaviour: Five Typologies of Australian Internet Users // Behaviour & Information Technology. Vol. 37, Issue 4, pp. 367–380.10.1080/0144929X.2018.1436593 Search in Google Scholar

9. Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem // Int. J. Technology Management. Vol. 46, Issue 3/4, pp. 201–234.10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374 Search in Google Scholar

10. Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D. F. J., Meissner, D., Stamati, D. (2018). The Ecosystem as Helix: An Exploratory Theory-Building Study of Regional Co-Opetitive Entrepreneurial Ecosystems as Quadruple/ Quintuple Helix Innovation Models // R&D Management. Vol. 48, Issue 1, pp. 148–162.10.1111/radm.12300 Search in Google Scholar

11. Caruso, S. (2014). Creating Digital Communities: A Resource to Digital Inclusion. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Search in Google Scholar

12. Chandler, D., Werther, W. B. (2014). Strategic Corporate Responsibility: Stakeholders, Globalization and Sustainable Value creation. SAGE Publications. Thousand Oaks, California. Search in Google Scholar

13. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance // The Academy of Management Review. Vol. 20, Issue 1, pp. 92–11.10.2307/258888 Search in Google Scholar

14. Damodaran, L., Gilbertson, T., Olphert, W., Sandhu, J., Craig, M. (2015). Digital Inclusion – The Vision, the Challenges and the Way Forward // International Journal on Advances in Internet Technology. Vol. 8, Issue 3–4. Search in Google Scholar

15. Dangi, T. B., Gribb, W. J. (2018). Sustainable Ecotourism Management and Visitor Experiences: Managing Conflicting Perspectives in Rocky Mountain National Park, USA // Journal of Ecotourism. Vol. 17, Issue 3, pp. 338–358. doi: 10.1080/14724049.2018.150225010.1080/14724049.2018.1502250 Search in Google Scholar

16. Domanski, D., Kaletka, C. (2017). Exploring the Research Landscape of Social Innovation. A deliverable of the project Social Innovation Community (SIC). Dortmund, Germany: Sozialforschungsstelle. Search in Google Scholar

17. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations // Research Policy. Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 109–123.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4 Search in Google Scholar

18. Freeman R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. – Boston: Pitman. Search in Google Scholar

19. Gallardo, R. (2019). Bringing Communities into the Digital Age // State and Local Government Review. Vol. 51, Issue 4, pp. 233–241.10.1177/0160323X20926696 Search in Google Scholar

20. Gallardo, R., Beaulieu, L. B., Geideman, C. (2020). Digital Inclusion and Parity: Implications for Community Development // Community Development. Vol. 52, Issue 1, pp. 4–21. doi:10.1080/15575330.2020.183081510.1080/15575330.2020.1830815 Search in Google Scholar

21. Gangadharan, S. P. (2017). The Downside of Digital Inclusion: Expectations and Experiences of Privacy and surveillance Among Marginal Internet Users // New Media & Society. Vol. 19, Issue 4, pp. 597–615.10.1177/1461444815614053 Search in Google Scholar

22. Gann, B. (2019). Digital Inclusion and Health in Wales // Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet. Vol. 23, Issue 2, pp. 146–160. doi: 10.1080/15398285.2019.1608499.10.1080/15398285.2019.1608499 Search in Google Scholar

23. Gann, B. (2019). Transforming Lives: Combating Digital Health Inequality // International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. Vol. 45, Issue 3, pp. 187–198.10.1177/0340035219845013 Search in Google Scholar

24. Gann, B. (2020). Combating Digital Health Inequality in the Time of Coronavirus // Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet. Vol. 24, Issue 3, pp. 278–284. doi: 10.1080/15398285.2020.179167010.1080/15398285.2020.1791670 Search in Google Scholar

25. Graves, S. J., German E. (2018). Evidence of Our Values: Disability Inclusion on Library Instruction Websites // Libraries and the Academy. Vol. 18, Issue 3, pp. 559–574.10.1353/pla.2018.0033 Search in Google Scholar

26. Harrison, J. S., Freeman, R. E., Sá de Abreu, M. C. (2015). Stakeholder Theory as an Ethical Approach to Effective Management: Applying the Theory to Multiple Contexts // Review Business Management. Vol. 17, Issue 2, pp. 858–869.10.7819/rbgn.v17i55.2647 Search in Google Scholar

27. Hasche, N., Höglund, L., Linton, G. (2020). Quadruple Helix as a Network of Relationships: Creating Value within a Swedish Regional Innovation System // Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship. Vol. 32, Issue 6, pp. 523–544. doi: 10.1080/08276331.2019.164313410.1080/08276331.2019.1643134 Search in Google Scholar

28. Helsper, E. J. (2012). A Corresponding Fields Model for the Links Between Social and Digital Exclusion // Communication Theory. Vol. 22, pp. 403–426.10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x Search in Google Scholar

29. Helsper, E. J., Reisdorf, B. C. (2017). The Emergence of a “Digital Underclass” in Great Britain and Sweden: Changing Reasons for Digital Exclusion // New Media & Society. Vol. 19, Issue 8, pp. 1253–1270.10.1177/1461444816634676 Search in Google Scholar

30. Hernández-Pérez, O., Vilariño, F., Domènech, M. (2020). Public Libraries Engaging Communities through Technology and Innovation: Insights from the Library Living Lab // Public Library Quarterly. Vol. 26, Issue 1. doi: 10.1080/01616846.2020.184504710.1080/01616846.2020.1845047 Search in Google Scholar

31. Holgersson, J., Söderström, E., Rose, J. (2019). Digital Inclusion for Elderly Citizens for a Sustainable Society // In Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). pp. 8–14, ISBN 978-1-7336325-0-8. Search in Google Scholar

32. Ilse M., Leo Van A., (2012). Towards a Multi-Stakeholders Approach for Digital Inclusion: A Case Study of Ghent’s ‘Digital.Talent’ Policy Program // IAMCR Conference proceedings, pp. 1–13 Search in Google Scholar

33. Johnston, N. (2020). The Shift towards Digital Literacy in Australian University Libraries: Developing a Digital Literacy Framework // Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association. Vol. 69, Issue 1, pp. 93–101. doi: 10.1080/24750158.2020.171263810.1080/24750158.2020.1712638 Search in Google Scholar

34. Kaletka, C., Pelka, B. (2015). Digital) Social Innovation Through Public Internet Access Points // Springer International Publishing. M. Antona and C. Stephanidis (Eds.): UAHCI, Part I, pp. 201–212. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20678-3_2010.1007/978-3-319-20678-3_20 Search in Google Scholar

35. Kang, Y., Jiang, J. (2020). Revisiting the Innovation Systems of Crossborder Cities: The Role of Higher Education Institution and Cross-Boundary Cooperation in Hong Kong and Shenzhen // Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. Vol. 42, Issue 2, pp. 213–229. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2019.170184910.1080/1360080X.2019.1701849 Search in Google Scholar

36. Khazaei, A., Elliot, S., Joppe, M. (2015). An Application of Stakeholder Theory to Advance Community Participation in Tourism Planning: The Case for Engaging Immigrants as Fringe Stakeholders // Journal of Sustainable Tourism. Vol. 23, Issue 7, pp. 1049–1062. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2015.104248110.1080/09669582.2015.1042481 Search in Google Scholar

37. Kriz, A., Bankins, S., Molloy, C. (2017). Readying a Region: Temporally Exploring the Development of an Australian Regional Quadruple Helix // R & D Management. Vol. 48, Issue 1. doi: 10.1111/radm.1229410.1111/radm.12294 Search in Google Scholar

38. Mahon, J. F., Heugens, P., McGowan, R. A. (2016). Blending Issues and Stakeholders: In Pursuit of the Elusive Synergy // Journal of Public Affairs. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.163510.1002/pa.1635 Search in Google Scholar

39. Makkonen T, Kahila P. (2020). Vitality Policy as a Tool for Rural Development in Peripheral Finland // Growth and Change. Vol. 52, Issue 2, pp. 706–726. doi: 10.1111/grow.1236410.1111/grow.12364 Search in Google Scholar

40. Manzoor, M., Vimarlund, V. (2018). Digital Technologies for Social Inclusion of Individuals with Disabilities // Health and Technology. Vol. 8, pp. 377–390. doi: 10.1007/ s12553-018-0239-110.1007/s12553-018-0239-1 Search in Google Scholar

41. Manžuch, Z., Macevičiūtė, E. (2020). Getting Ready to Reduce the Digital Divide: Scenarios of Lithuanian Public Libraries // Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Vol. 71, pp. 1205–1217.10.1002/asi.24324 Search in Google Scholar

42. Marques, C., Marques, A. V., Braga, V., Ratten, V. (2020). Technological Transfer and Spillovers Within the RIS3 Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: A Quadruple Helix Approach // Knowledge Management Research & Practice. Vol. 19, Issue 1, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1080/14778238.2020.177790910.1080/14778238.2020.1777909 Search in Google Scholar

43. McAdam, M., Miller, K., McAdam, R. (2018). Understanding Quadruple Helix Relationships of University Technology Commercialisation: A Micro-Level Approach // Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 43, Issue 3, pp. 1058–1073.doi: 10.1080/03075079.2016.121232810.1080/03075079.2016.1212328 Search in Google Scholar

44. Mehmood, A., Imran, M. (2021). Digital Social Innovation and Civic Participation: Toward Responsible and Inclusive Transport Planning // European Planning Studies. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2021.188294610.1080/09654313.2021.1882946 Search in Google Scholar

45. Mitchel, R. K., Agle, B. R., Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts // The Academy of Management Review. Vol. 22, Issue 4, pp. 853–886.10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105 Search in Google Scholar

46. Noh, Y. (2019). A Comparative Study of Public Libraries’ Contribution to Digital Inclusion in Korea and the United States // Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. Vol. 51, Issue 1, pp. 59–77.10.1177/0961000616668571 Search in Google Scholar

47. Phelps, K. (2017). Designing a Leadership-based Inquiry into Community Digital Literacy Initiatives // Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Vol. 54, Issue 1, pp. 770–772. doi: 10.1002/ pra2.2017.1450540115110.1002/pra2.2017.14505401151 Search in Google Scholar

48. Ragnedda, M., Ruiu, M. (2017). Social Capital and the Three Levels of Digital Divide // In Ragnedda M., Muschert G. eds. (2017), Theorizing Digital Divides, Routledge, pp. 21–34.10.4324/9781315455334-3 Search in Google Scholar

49. Ragnedda, M., Ruiu, M. L., Addeo, F. (2020). Measuring Digital Capital: An Empirical Investigation // New Media & Society. Vol. 22, Issue 5, pp. 793–816.10.1177/1461444819869604 Search in Google Scholar

50. Rashid, A. T. (2016). Digital Inclusion and Social Inequality: Gender Differences in ICT Access and Use in Five Developing Countries // Technology and Development. Vol. 20, Issue 3, pp. 306–332. doi: 10.1177/097185241666065110.1177/0971852416660651 Search in Google Scholar

51. Real, B., McDermott, A. J., Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T. (2015). Digital Inclusion and the Affordable Care Act: Public Libraries, Politics, Policy, and Enrollment in ‘Obamacare’ // Public Library Quarterly. Vol. 34, Issue. 1, pp. 1–22. doi: 10.1080/01616846.2015.100077010.1080/01616846.2015.1000770 Search in Google Scholar

52. Roloff, J. (2008). Learning from Multi-Stakeholder Networks: Issue-Focussed Stakeholder Management // Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 82, Issue 1, pp. 233–250. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9573-310.1007/s10551-007-9573-3 Search in Google Scholar

53. Rutherford, L., Singleton, A., Derr, A., Merga, M. K. (2018). Do Digital Devices Enhance Teenagers’ Recreational Reading Engagement? Issues for Library Policy from a Recent Study in Two Australian States // Public Library Quarterly. Vol. 37, Issue 3, pp. 318–340. doi: 10.1080/01616846.2018.1511214.10.1080/01616846.2018.1511214 Search in Google Scholar

54. Steurer, R. (2006). Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From the ‘Stakeholder Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business– Society Relations // Business Strategy and the Environment. Vol. 15, pp. 55–69.10.1002/bse.467 Search in Google Scholar

55. Strover, S. (2019). Public Libraries and 21^st Century Digital Equity Goals // Communication Research and Practice. Vol. 5, Issue 2, pp. 188–205. doi: 10.1080/22041451.2019.160148710.1080/22041451.2019.1601487 Search in Google Scholar

56. Strover, S., Whitacre, B., Rhinesmith, C., Schrubbe, A. (2020). The Digital Inclusion Role of Rural Libraries: Social Inequalities through Space and Place // Media, Culture & Society. Vol. 42, Issue 2, pp. 242–259. doi: 10.1177/016344371985350410.1177/0163443719853504 Search in Google Scholar

57. Terstriep, J., Rehfeld, D., Kleverbeck, M. (2020). Favourable Social Innovation Ecosystem(s)? – An Explorative Approach // European Planning Studies. Vol. 28, Issue 5, pp. 881–905.10.1080/09654313.2019.1708868 Search in Google Scholar

58. Tomaževič, N., Tekavčič, M., Peljhan, D. (2017). Towards Excellence in Public Administration: Organisation Theory-based Performance Management Model // Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. Vol. 28, Issue 5-6, pp. 578–599. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2015.110204810.1080/14783363.2015.1102048 Search in Google Scholar

59. Towner, N. (2018). Surfing Tourism and Local Stakeholder Collaboration // Journal of Ecotourism. Vol. 17, Issue 3, pp. 268–286. doi: 10.1080/14724049.2018.150350310.1080/14724049.2018.1503503 Search in Google Scholar

60. Williams, F., Philip, L., Farrington, J., Fairhurst, G. (2016). ‘Digital by Default’ and the ‘Hard to Reach’: Exploring Solutions to Digital Exclusion in Remote Rural Areas // Local Economy. Vol. 31, Issue 7, pp. 757–777.10.1177/0269094216670938 Search in Google Scholar

61. Winn M. (2001). Building Stakeholder Theory with a Decision Modelling Methodology // Business Society. Vol. 40, Issue 2, pp. 133–166.10.1177/000765030104000202 Search in Google Scholar