[BÖHME, K., DOUCET, P., KOMORNICKI, T., ZAUCHA, J., ŚWIĄTEK, D. (2011): How to strengthen the territorial dimension of Europe 2020 and the EU Cohesion Policy. Warsaw.]Search in Google Scholar
[BURNHAM, J. (1999): Contrasts and contradictions in French regional policy: from de Gaulle to Chirac, from the Treaty of Rome to the Treaty of Amsterdam, from central direction to local cooperation. In: Allison, M., Heathcote, O. [eds.]: Forty Years of the Fifth French Republic: Actions, Dialogues and Discourses (pp. 77–94). Bern, Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[ČSÚ (2014): Regional Office Brno [online]. Czech Statistical Office website [cit. 17.07.2015] Available at: <https://www.czso.cz/csu/xb>]Search in Google Scholar
[DAVOUDI, S. (2005): Understanding Territorial Cohesion. Planning, Practice & Research, 20(4): 433–441.10.1080/02697450600767926]Search in Google Scholar
[DINGSDALE, A. (1999): New Geographies of Post-Socialist Europe. The Geographical Journal, 165(2): 145–153.10.2307/3060412]Search in Google Scholar
[DOUCET, P. (2006): Territorial Cohesion of Tomorrow: A Path to Cooperation or Competition? European Planning Studies, 14(10): 1473–1485.10.1080/09654310600852449]Search in Google Scholar
[EC (2004): Third report on economic and social cohesion. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.]Search in Google Scholar
[EC (2007a): Fourth report on economic and social cohesion. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.]Search in Google Scholar
[EC (2007b): Treaty of Lisbon: amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community [online]. Official Journal of the European Union, C 306/1 [cit. 15.07.2015] Available at: <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12007L/TXT&from=EN>]Search in Google Scholar
[EC (2008): Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion: Turning territorial diversity into strength [online]. COM(2008) 616 final [cit. 16.07.2015] Available at: <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0616:FIN:EN:PDF>]Search in Google Scholar
[ENYEDI, G. (1990): New Basis for Regional and Urban Policies in East-Central Europe. Pecs: Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Sciences Discussion Paper No. 9.]Search in Google Scholar
[ENYEDI, G. (1996): Urbanization under socialism. In: Andrusz, G., Harloe, M., Szelenyi, I. [eds.]: Cities after socialism. Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies (pp. 100–118). Oxford, Willey-Blackwell.10.1002/9780470712733.ch4]Search in Google Scholar
[EU Ministers responsible for Spatial Development (2011): Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020 [online]. Agreed on 19 May 2011, Gödöllö [cit. 17.07.2015] Available at: <http://www.eu2011.hu/files/bveu/documents/TA2020.pdf>]Search in Google Scholar
[EVERS, D. (2008): Reflections on Territorial Cohesion and European Spatial Planning. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 99(3): 303–315.10.1111/j.1467-9663.2008.00463.x]Search in Google Scholar
[FALUDI, A. (2004): Territorial Cohesion: Old (French) Wine in New Bottles? Urban Studies, 41(7): 1349–1365.10.1080/0042098042000214833]Search in Google Scholar
[FALUDI, A. (2009): Territorial Cohesion under the Looking Glass [online]. Synthesis paper about the history of the concept and policy background to territorial cohesion [cit. 17.07.2015] Available at: <http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/consultation/terco/pdf/lookingglass.pdf>]Search in Google Scholar
[FALUDI, A. (2013): Territorial cohesion, territorialism, territoriality, and soft planning: a critical review. Environment and Planning A, 45: 1302–1317.10.1068/a45299]Search in Google Scholar
[FINKA, M., KLUVÁNKOVÁ, T. (2015): Managing complexity of urban systems: A polycentric approach. Land Use Policy, 42: 602–608.10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.016]Search in Google Scholar
[GEORGE, S. (1996): Politics and Policy in the European Union. Oxford, Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[HAMILTON, I. (1976): Spatial structure in east European cities. In: French, R.A., Hamilton, I. [eds.]: The socialist city (pp. 195–262). Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[HAMPL, M. (2005): Geografická organizace společnosti v České republice: Transformační procesy a jejich obecný kontext. Praha, Univerzita Karlova.]Search in Google Scholar
[HOFFMAN, L. (1994): After the fall: crisis and renewal in urban planning in the Czech Republic. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 18(4): 691–702.10.1111/j.1468-2427.1994.tb00293.x]Search in Google Scholar
[ILLNER, M., ANDRLE, A. (1994): The Regional Aspect of Post-Communist Transformation in the Czech Republic. Czech Sociological Review, 2(1): 107–127.10.13060/00380288.1994.30.11.22]Search in Google Scholar
[KRAFT, S., HALÁS, M., VANČURA, M. (2014): The delimitation of urban hinterlands based on transport flows: A case study of regional capitals in the Czech Republic. Moravian Geographical Reports, 22(1): 24–32.10.2478/mgr-2014-0003]Search in Google Scholar
[KUNC, J., TONEV, P., FRANTÁL, B., SZCZYRBA, Z. (2012): Retail gravity models, shopping habits and shopping centres: The case of the Brno agglomeration (a contribution to the study of daily urban systems), Sociologický časopis (Czech Sociological Review), 48(5): 879–910.10.13060/00380288.2012.48.5.04]Search in Google Scholar
[MALÍK, Z., ČADA, R., LUKAŠÍK, M., MUSIL, J., ULIČNÝ, F., ZBOŘIL, M. (1968): Kritéria racionálního rozvoje osídlení. Brno, Výzkumný ústav výstavby a architektury.]Search in Google Scholar
[MALÍK, Z. (1976): Urbanizace a rozvoj systému osídlení. Praha, Výzkumný ústav výstavby a architektury.]Search in Google Scholar
[MALÝ, J. (2016): Impact of Polycentric Urban Systems on Intra-regional Disparities: A Micro-regional Approach, European Planning Studies, 24(1): 116–138.10.1080/09654313.2015.1054792]Search in Google Scholar
[MAREŠ, J. (1988): Industrializace Československa – její klady a zápory. Sborník Československé geografické společnosti, 93(3): 183–198.]Search in Google Scholar
[MMR (2015a): Politika územního rozvoje České republiky, ve znění Aktualizace č. 1. Brno, Institute for Spatial Development.]Search in Google Scholar
[MMR (2015b): Vymezení ITI/IPRU metropolitních regionů v ČR. Internal document. Praha.]Search in Google Scholar
[MOLLE, W. (2007): European Cohesion Policy. Oxon, Routledge.10.4324/9780203945278]Search in Google Scholar
[MULÍČEK, O., TOUŠEK, V. (2004): Changes of Brno Industry and their Urban Consequences. Bulletin of Geography, 3: 61–70.]Search in Google Scholar
[MUSIL, J. (2001): Vývoj a plánování měst ve střední Evropě v období komunistických režimů – pohled historické sociologie. Sociologický časopis, 37(3): 275–296.]Search in Google Scholar
[MUSIL, J. (2002): Urbanizace českých zemí a socialismus. In: Horská, P., Maur, E., Musil, J. [eds.]: Zrod velkoměsta: Urbanizace českých zemí a Evropa (pp. 237–331). Praha-Litomyšl, Paseka.]Search in Google Scholar
[MUSIL, J., LINK, J. (1976): Urbanizace v socialistických zemích ve světle mezinárodních srovnání. In: Musil, J. [eds.]: Otázky urbanizace. Sborník výzkumných prací kabinetu sociologie (pp. 9–30). Praha, Výzkumný ústav výstavby a architektury.]Search in Google Scholar
[NEDOVIC-BUDIC, Z. (2001): Adjustment of planning practice to the new eastern and central European context. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(1): 38–52.10.1080/01944360108976354]Search in Google Scholar
[PALLA, V., MÁČEL, O., MALÍK, Z., LUKAŠÍK, M., ULIČNÝ, F., ČADA, R. (1962): Základní otázky osídlení v ČSSR. Brno, Výzkumný ústav výstavby a architektury.]Search in Google Scholar
[RYŠAVÝ, Z., DVOŘÁK, B., ŠIPLER, V. (1992): Posouzení dřívějších koncepcí územního rozvoje České republiky. Praha, Výzkumný ústav výstavby a architektury.]Search in Google Scholar
[SAUTER, W. (2008): Services of General Economic Interest and Universal Service in EU Law [online]. TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2008-017. European Law Review [cit. 13.07.2015] Available at: <http://www.nza.nl/104107/230942/Research-paper-'Services-of-General-Economic-Interest'-2008-05.pdf>]Search in Google Scholar
[SCHÖN, P. (2005): Territorial Cohesion in Europe? Planning Theory & Practice, 6(3): 389–400.10.1080/14649350500209397]Search in Google Scholar
[SERVILLO, L. (2010): Territorial Cohesion Discourses: Hegemonic Strategic Concepts in European Spatial Planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 11(3): 397–416.10.1080/14649357.2010.500135]Search in Google Scholar
[SOJA, E. (1980): The socio-spatial dialectic. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70(2): 207–225.10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x]Search in Google Scholar
[SOJA, E. (2009): The city and spatial justice [online]. Justice Spatiale/Spatial Justice 1 [cit. 13.07.2015] Available at: http://www.jssj.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/JSSJ1-1en4.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[SOKOL, M. (2001): Central and Eastern Europe a Decade After the Fall of State-socialism: Regional Dimensions of Transition Processes. Regional Studies, 35(7): 645–655.10.1080/00343400120075911]Search in Google Scholar
[SULKIEWICZ, M., ANDRLE, A., ŠTĚPÁNEK, M. (1981): Koncepce urbanizace a vývoje osídlení krajů ČSR: Koncepce sídelního systému. Praha, Terplan.]Search in Google Scholar
[SZCZEPAŃSKI, J., FURDYNA, A. (1977): Early Stages of Socialist Industrialization and Changes in Social Class Structure. International Journal of Sociology, 7(3/4): 11–36.10.1080/15579336.1977.11769669]Search in Google Scholar
[SZELENYI, I. (1996): Cities under socialism – and after. In: Andrusz, G., Harloe, M., Szelenyi, I. [eds.]: Cities after socialism. Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies (pp. 286–336). Oxford, Willey-Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[TERPLAN (1981): Koncepce sídelního skeletu: Výchozí podklady. Praha.]Search in Google Scholar
[TERPLAN (1985): Brněnská sídelní regionální aglomerace. Územní plán VÚC. Praha.]Search in Google Scholar
[UAD STUDIO (2014): Územní studie sídelní struktury Jihomoravského kraje. Brno.]Search in Google Scholar
[USB (2015): Zásady územního rozvoje Jihomoravského kraje. In preparation. Brno.]Search in Google Scholar
[VENERI, P., BURGALASSI, D. (2012): Questioning polycentric development and its effects: Issues of definition and measurement for the Italian NUTS 2 Regions. European Planning Studies, 20(6): 1017–1037.10.1080/09654313.2012.673566]Search in Google Scholar
[VÚVA (1979): Zásady a pravidla územního plánování. Výzkumný ústav výstavby a architektury, Urbanistické pracoviště Brno.]Search in Google Scholar
[WATERHOUT, B. (2007): Territorial Cohesion: The Underlying Discourses. In: Faludi, A. [ed.]: Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society (pp. 37–59). Cambridge (MA), Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.]Search in Google Scholar
[WU, F. (2003): Transitional Cities. Commentary. Environment and Planning A, 35: 1331–1338.10.1068/a3634]Search in Google Scholar
