[Chang, L. and J. Krosnick. 2009. “National Surveys via RDD Telephone Interviewing versus the Internet. Comparing Sample Representativeness and Response Quality.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74: 641–678. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp075.10.1093/poq/nfp075]Search in Google Scholar
[Greenleaf, E. 1992. “Measuring Extreme Response Styles.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 56(3): 328–351. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/269326.10.1086/269326]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R. and L. Lyberg. 2010. “Total Survey Error: Past, Present, and Future.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 74(5): 849–879. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq065.10.1093/poq/nfq065]Search in Google Scholar
[Hox, J. 2010. Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hox, J., E. de Leeuw, and I. Kreft. 1991. “The Effect of Interviewer and Respondent Characteristics on the Quality of Survey Data: a Multilevel Model.” In Measurement Errors in Surveys, edited by P. Biemer, R. Groves, L. Lyberg, N. Mathiowetz, and S. Sudman. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krosnick, J. 1991. “Response Strategies for Coping with the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 5(3): 213–236. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305.10.1002/acp.2350050305]Search in Google Scholar
[Krosnick, J. and F. Alwin. 1988. “A Test of the Form-Resistant Correlation Hypothesis: Ratings, Rankings, and the Measurement of Values.” Public Opinion Quarterly 52(4): 526–538.10.1086/269128]Search in Google Scholar
[Loosveldt, G. and K. Beullens. 2013. “The Impact of Respondents and Interviewers on Interview Speed in Face-to-Face Interviews.” Social Science Research 42(6): 1422–1430. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.06.005.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.06.00524090842]Search in Google Scholar
[Malnar, B. and K.H. Müller. 2014. Surveys and Self-Reflexivity: A Second-Order Study of the European Social Survey (ESS). Wien: Echoraum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Olson, K. and I. Bilgen. 2011. “The Role of Interviewer Experience on Acquiescence.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75(1): 99–114. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq067.10.1093/poq/nfq067]Search in Google Scholar
[Simon, H. 1956. “Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment.” Psychological Review 63(2): 129–138. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0042769.10.1037/h004276913310708]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Vaerenberg, Y. and T. Thomas. 2013. “Response Styles in Survey Research: A Literature Review of Antecedents, Consequences, and Remedies.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 25(2): 195–217. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/eds021.10.1093/ijpor/eds021]Search in Google Scholar
[Weijters, B., E. Cabooter, and N. Schillewaert. 2010b. “The Effect of Rating Scale Format on Response Styles. The Number of Response Categories and Response Category Labels.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 27(3): 236–247. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.02.004.10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.02.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Weijters, B., M. Geuens, and N. Schillewaert. 2010a. “The Stability of Individual Response Styles.” Psychological Methods 15(1): 96–110. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018721.10.1037/a001872120230106]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, C. and F. Conrad. 2013. “Speeding in Web Surveys: The Tendency to Answer Very Fast and its Association With Straightlining.” Survey Research Methods 8(2): 127–135. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2014.v8i2.5453.]Search in Google Scholar