[Alagna, V., Bagarello, V., Di Prima, S., Iovino, M., 2016. Determining hydraulic properties of a loam soil by alternative infiltrometer techniques. Hydrol. Process., 30, 263–275.10.1002/hyp.10607]Search in Google Scholar
[Angulo-Jaramillo, R., Bagarello, V., Iovino, M., Lassabatere, L., 2016. Infiltration Measurements for Soil Hydraulic Characterization. Springer International Publishing, AG Switzerland, 386 p.10.1007/978-3-319-31788-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Bagarello, V., Castellini, M., Di Prima, S., Iovino, M., 2014. Soil hydraulic properties determined by infiltration experiments and different heights of water pouring. Geoderma, 213, 492–501.10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.032]Search in Google Scholar
[Beven, K., Germann, P., 2013. Macropores and water flow in soils revisited. Water Resour. Res., 49, 6, 3071–3092.10.1002/wrcr.20156]Search in Google Scholar
[Brooks, E.S., Boll, J., McDaniel, P.A., 2004. A hillslope-scale experiment to measure lateral saturated hydraulic conductivity. Water Resour. Res., 40, W04208. DOI: 10.1029/2003WR002858.10.1029/2003WR002858]Search in Google Scholar
[Buczko, U., Bens, O., Fischer, H., Hüttl, R.F., 2002. Water repellency in sandy luvisols under different forest transformation stages in northeast Germany. Geoderma, 109, 1–2, 1–18.10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00137-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Buczko, U., Bens, O., Hüttl, R.F., 2005. Variability of soil water repellency in sandy forest soils with different stand structure under Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and beech (Fagus sylvatica). Geoderma, 126, 3–4, 317–336.10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.10.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Císlerová, M., Šimůnek, J., Vogel, T., 1988. Changes of steady-state infiltration rates in recurrent ponding infiltration experiments. J. Hydrol., 104, 1–4, 1–16.10.1016/0022-1694(88)90154-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Clothier, B.E., Green, S.R., Deurer, M., 2008. Preferential flow and transport in soil: progress and prognosis. Eur. J. Soil Sci., 59, 1, 2–13.10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00991.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Dekker, L.W., Ritsema, C.J., 1994. How water moves in a water repellent sandy soil. 1. Potential and actual water repellency. Water Resour. Res., 30, 9, 2507–2517.10.1029/94WR00749]Search in Google Scholar
[Dohnal, M., Jelinkova, V., Snehota, M., Dusek, J., Brezina, J., 2013. Tree-dimensional numerical analysis of water flow affected by entrapped air: Application of noninvasive imaging techniques. Vadose Zone J., 12, 1.10.2136/vzj2012.0078]Search in Google Scholar
[Gerke, H.H., 2006. Review Article: Preferential flow descriptions for structured soils. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 169, 382–400.10.1002/jpln.200521955]Search in Google Scholar
[Gerke, H.H., Köhne, J.M., 2002. Estimating hydraulic properties of soil aggregate skins from sorptivity and water retention. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 66, 26–36.10.2136/sssaj2002.2600]Search in Google Scholar
[Gerke, H.H., Germann, P., Nieber, J., 2010. Preferential and unstable flow: from the pore to the catchment scale. Vadose Zone J., 9, 2, 207–212.10.2136/vzj2010.0059]Search in Google Scholar
[Goutaland, D., Winiarski, T., Lassabatere, L., Dubé, J.S., Angulo-Jaramillo, R., 2013. Sedimentary and hydraulic characterization of a heterogeneous glaciofluvial deposit: Application to the modeling of unsaturated flow. Eng. Geol., 166, 127–139.10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.09.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Green, T.R., Ahuja, L.R., Benjamin, J.G., 2003. Advances and challenges in predicting agricultural management effects on soil hydraulic properties. Geoderma, 116, 1–2, 3–27.10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00091-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Hallett, P.D., Nunan, N., Douglas, J.T., Young, I.M., 2004. Millimeter-scale spatial variability in soil water sorptivity: Scale, surface elevation, and subcritical repellency effects. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 68, 2, 352–358.10.2136/sssaj2004.3520]Search in Google Scholar
[Haws, N.W., Liu, B., Boast, C.W., Rao, P.S.C., Kladivko, E.J., Franzmeier, D.P., 2004. Spatial variability and measurement scale of infiltration rate on an agricultural landscape contribution of the Indiana Agricultural Research Programs. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 68, 1818–1826.10.2136/sssaj2004.1818]Search in Google Scholar
[Hillel, D., 1998. Environmental Soil Physics. Academic Press, San Diego, 771 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hodnett, M.G., Tomasella, J., 2002. Marked differences between van Genuchten soil water-retention parameters for temperate and tropical soils: a new water-retention pedotransfer functions developed for tropical soils. Geoderma, 108, 3, 155–180.10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00105-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Jarvis, N.J., 2007. A review of non-equilibrium water flow and solute transport in soil macropores: principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality. Eur. J. Soil Sci., 58, 523–546.10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00915.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Jarvis, N.J., Zavattaro, L., Rajkai, K., Reynolds, W.D., Olsen, P.A., Mcgechan, M., Mecke, M., Mohanty, B., Leeds-Harrison, P.B., Jacques, D., 2002. Indirect estimation of near-saturated hydraulic conductivity from readily available soil information. Geoderma, 108, 1–17.10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00154-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Jarvis, N., Koestel, J., Messing, I., Moeys, J., Lindahl, A., 2013. Influence of soil, land use and climatic factors on the hydraulic conductivity of soil. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 12, 5185–5195.10.5194/hess-17-5185-2013]Search in Google Scholar
[Köhne, J.M., Köhne, S., Šimůnek, J., 2009. A review of model applications for structured soils: a) Water flow and tracer transport. J. Cont. Hydrol., 104, 1–36.10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.10.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Lassabatere, L., Angulo-Jaramillo, R., Ugalde, J.M.S., Cuenca, R., Braud, I., Haverkamp, R., 2006. Beerkan estimation of soil transfer parameters through infiltration experiments - BEST. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 70, 2, 521–532.10.2136/sssaj2005.0026]Search in Google Scholar
[Lassabatere, L., Yilmaz, D., Peyrard, X., Peyneau, P.E., Lenoir, T., Šimůnek, J., Angulo-Jaramillo, R., 2014. New analytical model for cumulative infiltration into dual-permeability soils. Vadose Zone J., 13, 1–15.10.2136/vzj2013.10.0181]Search in Google Scholar
[Leeds-Harrison, P.B., Youngs, E.G., Udin, B., 1994. A device for determining the sorptivity of soil aggregates. Eur. J. Soil Sci., 45, 269–272.10.1111/j.1365-2389.1994.tb00509.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Letey, J., Carrillo, M.L.K., Pang, X.P., 2000. Approaches to characterize the degree of water repellency. J. Hydrol., 231–232, 0, 61–65.10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00183-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Lichner, L., Hallett, P.D., Drongová, Z., Czachor, H., Kovacik, L., Mataix-Solera, J., Homolák, M., 2013. Algae influence the hydrophysical parameters of a sandy soil. Catena, 108, 58–68.10.1016/j.catena.2012.02.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Lin, H., Flühler, H., Otten, W., Vogel, H.-J., 2010. Soil architecture and preferential flow across scales. J. Hydrol., 393, 1–2.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.026]Search in Google Scholar
[Minasny, B., Hartemink, A.E., 2011. Predicting soil properties in the tropics. Earth-Science Reviews, 106, 1, 52–62.10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.01.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Nielsen, D., Biggar, J., Erh, K., 1973. Spatial variability of fieldmeasured soil-water properties. Hilgardia, 42, 7, 215–259.10.3733/hilg.v42n07p215]Search in Google Scholar
[Reynolds, W.D., Bowman, B.T., Brunke, R.R., Drury, C.F., Tan, C.S., 2000. Comparison of tension infiltrometer, pressure infiltrometer, and soil core estimates of saturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 2, 478–484.10.2136/sssaj2000.642478x]Search in Google Scholar
[Šimůnek, J., van Genuchten, M.T., Šejna, M., 2016. Recent developments and applications of the HYDRUS computer software Packages. Vadose Zone J., DOI: 10.2136/vzj2016.04.0033.10.2136/vzj2016.04.0033]Search in Google Scholar
[Sněhota, M., Císlerová, M., Amin, M.H.G., Hall, L.D., 2010. Tracing the entrapped air in heterogeneous soil by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Vadose Zone J., 9, 2, 373–384.10.2136/vzj2009.0103]Search in Google Scholar
[Tillman, R.W., Scotter, D.R., Wallis, M.G., Clothier, B.E., 1989. Water-repellency and its measurement by using intrinsic sorptivity. Aust. J. Soil Res., 27, 4, 637–644.10.1071/SR9890637]Search in Google Scholar
[Verbist, K.M.J., Cornelis, W.M., Torfs, S., Gabriels, D., 2013. Comparing methods to determine hydraulic conductivities on stony soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 77, 1, 25–42.10.2136/sssaj2012.0025]Search in Google Scholar
[Vogelmann, E.S., Reichert, J.M., Prevedello, J., Consensa, C.O.B., Oliveira, A.É., Awe, G.O., Mataix-Solera, J., 2013. Threshold water content beyond which hydrophobic soils become hydrophilic: The role of soil texture and organic matter content. Geoderma, 209–210, 177–187.10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.019]Search in Google Scholar
[Wosten, J.H.M., Pachepsky, Y.A., Rawls, W.J., 2001. Pedotransfer functions: bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics. J. Hydrol., 251, 123–150.10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00464-4]Search in Google Scholar