[1. Schaar JA, Muller JE, Falk E, et al. Terminology for high-risk and vulnerable coronary artery plaques. Report of a meeting on the vulnerable plaque, June 17 and 18, 2003, Santorini, Greece. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:1077-1082.10.1016/j.ehj.2004.01.00215191780]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Opolski MP, Kępka C, Rużyłło W. Computed tomography for detection of vulnerable coronary plaque – A Cassandra’s dream? Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej/Advances in Interventional Cardiology. 2014;10:147-152.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Motoyama S, Masayoshi S, Harigaya H, et al. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:49-57.10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.06819555840]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Maurovich-Horvat P, Schlett CL, Alkadhi H, et al. The napkin-ring sign indicates advanced atherosclerotic lesions in coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:1243-1252.10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.03.01923236975]Search in Google Scholar
[5. van Velzen JE, de Graaf FR, de Graaf MA, et al. Comprehensive assessment of spotty calcifications on computed tomography angiography: comparison to plaque characteristics on intravascular ultrasound with radiofrequency backscatter analysis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18:893-903.10.1007/s12350-011-9428-2317504521769702]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Motoyama S, Kondo T, Sarai M, et al. Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:319-326.10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.04417659199]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Cilla M, Pena E, Martinez MA, Kelly DJ. Comparison of the vulnerability risk for positive versus negative atheroma plaque morphology. J Biomech. 2013;46:1248-1254.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.02.01223523380]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Benedek T, Gyöngyösi M, Benedek I. Multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography for quantitative assessment of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29:364-371.10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.00423333164]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Batty JA, Subba S, Luke P, Gigi LWC, Sinclair H, Kunadian V. Intracoronary imaging in the detection of vulnerable plaques. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016;18:28.10.1007/s11886-016-0705-1475433326879196]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Huynh K. Imaging: Combining IVUS and NIRS improves accuracy of fibroatheroma detection. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12:130.10.1038/nrcardio.2015.325622847]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Sinclair H, Bourantas C, Bagnall A, Mintz GS, Kunadian V. OCT for identification of Vulnerable Plaque in Acute Coronary Syndrome. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:198-209.10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.12.00525677892]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Rasouli ML, Shavelle DM, French WJ, McKay CR, Budoff MJ. Assessment of coronary plaque morphology by contrast enhanced computed tomographic angiography: CT Imaging of Coronary Artery Plaque 313 comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Coron Artery Dis. 2006;17:359-364.10.1097/00019501-200606000-0000616707959]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Nance JW Jr, Schlett CL, Schoepf UJ, et al. Incremental prognostic value of different components of coronary atherosclerotic plaque at cardiac CT angiography beyond coronary calcification in patients with acute chest pain. Radiology. 2012;264:679-690.10.1148/radiol.1211235022820732]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D, et al. Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 2004;109:14-17.10.1161/01.CIR.0000111517.69230.0F14691045]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Kim SY, Kim KS, Lee SY, et al. Assessment of non-calcified plaques Using 64-Slice Computed Tomography: Comparison with Intravascular Ultrasound. Korean Circ J. 2009;39:95-99.10.4070/kcj.2009.39.3.95277180519949594]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Sato A. Coronary plaque imaging by coronary computed tomography angiography. World J Radiol. 2014;6:148-159.10.4329/wjr.v6.i5.148403754124876919]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Conte E, Annoni A, Pontone G, et al. Evaluation of coronary plaque characteristics with coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease: a long-term follow-up study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;pii:jew200. [Epub ahead of print]10.1093/ehjci/jew20027679600]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Benedek T, Jako B, Benedek I. Plaque quantification by coronary CT and intravascular ultrasound identifies a low CT density core as a marker for plaque instability in acute coronary syndromes. Int Heart J. 2014;55:22-28.10.1536/ihj.13-21324463925]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Nadjiri J, Hausleiter J, Jähnichen C, et al. Incremental prognostic value of quantitative plaque assessment in coronary CT angiography during 5 years of follow up. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10:97-104.10.1016/j.jcct.2016.01.00726837235]Search in Google Scholar