[Boronenko, V., and Zeibote, Z. 2011. ‘The Potential of Cluster Development and the Role of Cluster Support Policies in Latvia’. Economic Annals 56 (191): 35–67. doi:10.2298/EKA1191035B.10.2298/EKA1191035]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Caju, Ph. Du, Katay, G., Lamo, A., Nicolitsas, D., and Poelhekke, S. 2010. ‘Inter-Industry Wage Differentials in EU Countries: What Do Cross-Country Time Varying Data Add to the Picture?’ Journal of the European Economic Association 8 (2–3): 478–86. doi:10.1162/jeea.2010.8.2-3.478.10.1162/jeea.2010.8.2-3.478]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. 2017. Statistics Database. Retrieved from: http://www.csb.gov.lv/en/dati/statistics-database-30501.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Clark, C. 1940. The Conditions of Economic Progress. 1st ed. London: Mcmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cross-sectoral Coordination Centre. 2013. ‘National Development Plan of Latvia for 2014–2020’. ‘Latvijas Vēstnesis’. http://www.pkc.gov.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/NDP2020EnglishFinal__.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dietrich, A. 2012. ‘Does Growth Cause Structural Change, or Is It the Other Way around ? A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis for Seven OECD Countries’. Empir Econ 43: 915–44. doi:10.1007/s00181-011-0510-z.10.1007/s00181-011-0510-z]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dinc, M. 2002. ‘Regional and Local Economic Analysis Tools’. World Bank Institute. Washington DC: The World Bank.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fisher, A. 1939. ‘Production, Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary’. Economic Record 15: 24–38. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-1380-6.10.1007/978-1-4614-1380-6]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fourastié, J. 1954. Die Große Hoffnung Des 20. Jahrhunderts. (‘The Great Hope of the 20th Century’). Köln-Deutz.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fracasso, A., and Vittucci Marzetti, G. 2017. ‘Estimating Dynamic Localization Economies: The Inadvertent Success of the Specialization Index and the Location Quotient’. Regional Studies, no. December 2016: 1–14. do i:10.1080/00343404.2017.1281388.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gokan, T. 2010. ‘On the Usage of the Measurements of Geographical Concentration and Specialization with Areal Data’. In Spatial Statistics and Industrial Location in CLMV: An Interim Report, edited by Ikuo Kuroiwa. IDE-JETRO.]Search in Google Scholar
[Havlik, P. 2005. ‘Structural Change, Productivity and Employment in the New EU Member States’. Wiiw Research Reports. The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamola, L., Ivanova, S., and Kamols, U. 2016. ‘Trends of Regional Development in Latvia – Aspect of Human Resource’. In Proceedings of 13th Research World International Conference, 4:21–25. Khandagiri, Bhubaneswar.]Search in Google Scholar
[Keller, R. 2009. ‘How Shifting Occupational Composition Has Affected the Real Average Wage’. Monthly Labor Review, no. June: 26–38.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kemeny, T., and Storper, M. 2015. ‘Is Specialization Good for Regional Economic Development?’ Regional Studies 49 (6): 1003–18. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.899691.10.1080/00343404.2014.899691]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Krüger, J. 2008. ‘Productivity and Structural Change: A Review of the Literature’. Journal of Economic Surveys 22 (2): 330–63. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00539.x.10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00539.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kutscherauer, A., Fachinelli, H., Hucka, M., Skokan, K., Suchacek, J., Tomanek, P., and Tuleja, P. 2010. ‘Disparities in Country Regional Development - Concept, Theory, Identification and Assessment’. Regional Disparities in Regional Development of the Czech Republic. Ostrava: VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, Faculty of Economics. do i:10.1177/0020881787024003002.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuznets, S. 1973. ‘Modern Economic Growth: Findings and Reflections’. American Economic Review 63 (3): 247–58. doi:10.2307/1914358.10.2307/1914358]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Magda, I., Rycx, F., Tojerow, I., and Valsamis, D. 2011. ‘Wage Differentials across Sectors in Europe: An East-West Comparison’. Economics of Transition 19 (4): 749–69. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0351.2011.00417.x.10.1111/j.1468-0351.2011.00417.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Makarem, N., Storper, M. and Kemeny, T. 2015. The Rise and Fall of Urban Economies: Lessons from San Francisco and Los Angeles. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.10.11126/stanford/9780804789400.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Masso, J., and Krillo, K. 2011. ‘Labour Markets in the Baltic States during the Crisis 2008-2009: The Effect on Different Labour Market Groups’. 79. The University of Tartu Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper. Tartu.10.2139/ssrn.1734378]Search in Google Scholar
[McMillan, M., Rodrik, D., and Sepúlveda C., eds. 2016. Structural Change, Fundamentals, and Growth: A Framework and Case Studies. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institue (IFPRI). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2499/9780896292147.10.2499/9780896292147]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Melihovs, A., and Kasjanovs, I. 2011. ‘The Convergence Processes in Europe and Latvia’. Discussion Papers. Latvijas Banka.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mihnenoka, A., and Saulītis, J. 2013. ‘Evaluating the Significance of Structural Changes within National Economy for Economic Growth of Latvia Using the Econometric Model.’ Economics and Business 23: 62–70.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mikulić, D., Lovrinčević, Ž., and Nagyszombaty, A. G. 2013. ‘Regional Convergence in the European Union, New Member States and Croatia’. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 8 (1): 9–21. doi:10.2478/jeb-2013-0001.10.2478/jeb-2013-0001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[MPS Task Force of the ESCB. 2004. ‘Sector Specialisaiton in the EU: A Macroeconomic Perspective’. ECB Occasional Paper Series.]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Leary, E., and Webber, Don J. 2015. ‘The Role of Structural Change in European Regional Productivity Growth’. Regional Studies 49 (9): 1548–60. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.839868.10.1080/00343404.2013.839868]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Peneder, M., Kaniovski, S., and Dachs, B. 2003. ‘What Follows Tertiarisation? Structural Change and the Role of Knowledge-Based Services’. The Service Industries Journal 23 (2): 47–66. doi:10.1080/02642060412331300882.10.1080/02642060412331300882]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Peneder, M. 2009. Sectoral Growth Drivers and Competitiveness in the European Union. European Communities. doi:10.2769/55360.10.2769/55360]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Poledníková, E., and Lelková, P. 2012. ‘Evaluation of Regional Disparities in Visegrad Four Countries, Germany and Austria Using the Cluster Analysis’. In XV. International Colloquium on Regional Sciences: Valtice, 20 to 22 June 2012, 36–47. Valtice: Masaryk University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sayago-Gomez, J. T., and Stair, C. 2015. ‘Location Quotient, Coefficient of Specialization and Shift-Share’. Working Papers. Technical Document Series.]Search in Google Scholar
[Silva, E., and Teixeira, A. 2008. ‘Surveying Structural Change: Seminal Contributions and a Bibliometric Account’. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 19 (4): 273–300. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2008.02.001.10.1016/j.strueco.2008.02.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Šipilova, V. 2012. ‘Structural Changes in Gross Domestic Product in Latvia Quantitative and Qualitative Aspects’. In Proceedings in EIIC - 1st Electronic International Interdisciplinary Conference, 290–96. EDIS - Publishing Institution of the University of Zilina.]Search in Google Scholar
[Šipilova, V. 2013. ‘Human Capital, Education and the Labor Market: Evaluation of Interaction in Latvia’. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106:1384–92. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.154.10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.154]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Šipilova, V., and Baldi, G. 2013. ‘On the Structural Composition of Latvia’s Economy: A Detailed Account of Its Specialization and Regional Differentiation’. Regional Review, no. 9: 5–15.]Search in Google Scholar
[Skribane, I., and Jekabsone, S. 2013. ‘Structural Changes in the Economy of Latvia after It Joined the European Union’. Intellectual Economics 7 (1): 29–41.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stiglitz, J. E. 2011. ‘Rethinking Macroeconomics: What Failed, and to How Repair It’. Journal of the European Economic Association 9 (4). Blackwell Publishing Inc: 591–645. doi:10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01030.x.10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01030.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Stojčić, N., Bezić, H., and Galović, T. 2016. ‘Economic Structure and Regional Economic Performance in Advanced Eu Economies’. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 11 (1): 54–66. doi:10.1515/jeb-2016-0004.10.1515/jeb-2016-0004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tvrdoň, M., and Skokan, K. 2011. ‘Regional Disparities and the Ways of Their Measurement: The Case of the Visegrad Four Countries’. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17 (3): 501–18. doi:10.3846/20294913.2011.603485.10.3846/20294913.2011.603485]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Vanags, A., Basarova, J., and Titova, N. 2002. ‘Industrial and Intellectual Capital Clusters in the Baltic States’. In 42nd Congress of the European Regional Science Association: ‘From Industry to Advanced Services - Perspectives of European Metropolitan Regions’. Dortmund.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wishlade, F., and Yuill, D. 1997. ‘Measuring Disparities for Area Designation Purposes: Issues for the European Union’. Regional and Industrial Policy Research Paper. Glasgow : European Policies Research Centre.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolfe, M. 1955. ‘The Concept of Economic Sectors’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 69 (3): 402–20. doi:10.2307/1885848.10.2307/1885848]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Wölfl, A. 2005. ‘The Service Economy in OECD Countries’. The Service Economy in OECD Countries. Vol. 3. doi:10.1787/212257000720.10.1787/212257000720]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar