[Alaux, C., Jaisson, P., & Hefetz, A. (2004). Queen Influence on Worker Reproduction in Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) Colonies. Insectes Sociaux, 51, 287-293. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-004-0741-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Alaux, C., Jaisson, P., & Hefetz, A. (2005). Reproductive Decision-Making in Semelparous Colonies of the Bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 59, 270-277. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0035-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Alaux, C., Jaisson, P., & Hefetz, A. (2006). Regulation of Worker Reproduction in Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris): Workers Eavesdrop on a Queen Signal. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 60, 439-446. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0184-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Amsalem, E., Grozinger, C.M., Padilla, M., Hefetz, A. (2015). Bumble Bee Sociobiology: the Physiological and Genomic Bases of Bumble Bee Social Behaviour. Advances in Insect Physiology, 48, 37-93. http://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aiip.2015.01.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Baer, B. (2003). Bumblebees as Model Organisms to Study Male Sexual Selection in Social Insects. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 55, 523-532. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0673-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Bloch, G., Borst, D.W., Huang, Z.Y., Robinson, G.E., Hefetz, A. (1996). Effects of Social Conditions on Juvenile Hormone Mediated Reproductive Development in Bombus terrestris Workers. Physiological Entomology, 21, 257-267.10.1111/j.1365-3032.1996.tb00863.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Bloch, G. (1999). Regulation of Queen-Worker Conlict in Bumble-Bee (Bombus terrestris) Colonies. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 2465-2469.10.1098/rspb.1999.0947169048610693816]Search in Google Scholar
[Bloch, G., & Hefetz, A. (1999). Regulation of Reproduction by Dominant Workers in Bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) Queenright Colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 45, 125-135.10.1007/s002650050546]Search in Google Scholar
[Cnaani, J., Robinson, G.E., Bloch, G., Brost, D., Hefetz, A. (2000). The Effect of Queen-Worker Conflict in the Caste Determination in the Bumblebee. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 47, 346-352.10.1007/s002650050675]Search in Google Scholar
[Duchateau, M.J., & Velthuis H.H.W. (1988). Development and Reproductive Strategies in Bombus terrestris Colonies. Behaviour, 107, 186-207.10.1163/156853988X00340]Search in Google Scholar
[Duchateau, M.J., & Velthuis, H.H.W. (1989). Ovarian Development and Egg Laying in Workers of Bombus terrestris. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 51, 199-213.10.1111/j.1570-7458.1989.tb01231.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Duchateau, M.J. (1991). Regulation of Colony Development in Bumblebees. Acta Horticulturae, 288, 139–143.10.17660/ActaHortic.1991.288.17]Search in Google Scholar
[Foster, R.L., Brunskill, A., Verdirame, D., O’Donnell S. (2004). Reproductive Physiology, Dominance Interactions, and Division of Labour Among Bumble Bee Workers. Physiological Entomology, 29, 327–334.10.1111/j.0307-6962.2004.00388.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Gosterit, A. (2011). Effect of Different Reproductive Strategies on colony Development Characteristics in Bombus terrrestris L. Journal of Apicultural Science, 55, 45-51.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gurel, F., & Gosterit, A. (2008). Effects of Different Stimulation Methods on Colony Initiation and Development of Bombus terrestris L. (Hymenoptera; Apidae) Queens. Applied Entomology and Zoology, 43, 113-117. http://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2008.113]Search in Google Scholar
[Keller, L., & Nonacs, P. (1993). The Role of Queen Pheromones in social Insects: Queen Control or Queen Signal? Animal Behaviour, 45, 787–794.10.1006/anbe.1993.1092]Search in Google Scholar
[Lopez-Vaamonde, C., Koning, J.W., Jordan, W.C., Bourke, A.F.G. (2003). No Evidence that Reproductive Bumblebee Workers Reduce the Production of New Queens. Animal Behaviour, 66, 577-584. http://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.2205.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lopez-Vaamonde, C., Koning, J.W., Jordan, W.C., Bourke, A.F.G. (2004). A Test of Information Use by Reproductive Bumblebee Workers. Animal Behaviour, 68, 811-818. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.01.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Lopez-Vaamonde, C., Brown, M., Lucas, E.R., Pereboom, J.J.M., Jordan, W.C., Bourke, A.F.G. (2007). Effect of the Queen on Worker Reproduction and New Queen Production in the Bumble Bee Bombus terrestris. Apidologie, 38, 171-180. http://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2006070]Search in Google Scholar
[Roseler, P.F., Roseler, I., & van Honk, C.G.J. (1981). Evidence for Inhibition of Corpora Allata Activity in Workers of Bombus terrestris by a Pheromone from the Queen’s Mandibular Glands. Experientia, 37, 348-351.10.1007/BF01959856]Search in Google Scholar
[van Doorn, A. (1989). Factors Influencing Dominance Behavior in Queenless Bumblebee Workers Bombus terrestris. Physiological Entomology, 14, 211-222.10.1111/j.1365-3032.1989.tb00954.x]Search in Google Scholar
[van Honk, C.J.G., Velthuis, H.H.W., Roseler, P.F., Malotaux, M.E. (1980). The Mandibular Glands of Bombus terrestris Queens as a Source of Queen Pheromones. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 28, 191-198.10.1111/j.1570-7458.1980.tb03004.x]Search in Google Scholar
[van Honk, C.G.J., Roseler, P.F., Velthuis, H.H.W., Hoogeveen J.C. (1981). Factors Influencing the Egg Laying of Workers in a Captive Bombus terrestris Colony. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 9, 9-14.10.1007/BF00299847]Search in Google Scholar
[Velthuis, H.H.W., & van Doorn, A. (2006). A Century of Advances in Bumblebee Domestication and the Economic and Environmental Aspects of its Commercialization for Pollination. Apidologie, 37, 421-451. http://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2006019]Search in Google Scholar
[Vergara, C.H., Schroder, S., Almanza, M.T., Wittmann, D. (2003). Suppression of Ovarian Development of Bombus terrestris Workers by B. terrestris Queens, Psithyrus vestalis and Psithyrus bohemicus Females. Apidologie, 34, 563-568. http://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2003056]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams, P.H. (1998). An Annotated Checklist of Bumblebees with an Analysis of Patterns of Description. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum Entomology, 67, 79-152.]Search in Google Scholar