Uneingeschränkter Zugang

The Role of Hybrid Methodologies in Understanding Complex Environmental Issues and Promoting Social Justice


Zitieren

[1] Agarwal, B. (1992). The gender and environment debate: Lessons from India. Feminist Studies, 18(1), 119-158. doi:10.2307/3178217 Search in Google Scholar

[2] Arora-Jonsson, S. (2011). Virtue and vulnerability: Discourses on women, gender and climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 744-751. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.005 Search in Google Scholar

[3] Béland, D., & Cox, R. H. (2013). The politics of policy paradigms. Governance, 26(2), 193-195. doi:10.1111/gove.12034 Search in Google Scholar

[4] Buechler, S., & Hanson, A. S. (2015). A political ecology of women, water and global environmental change. New York: Routledge Search in Google Scholar

[5] Carr, E. R. (2008). Men’s crops and women’s crops: The importance of gender to the understanding of agricultural and development outcomes in Ghana’s central region. World Development, 36(5), 900-915. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.05.009 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. (Women of color at the center: Selections from the third national conference on women of color and the law). Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299. doi:10.2307/1229039 Search in Google Scholar

[7] Cupples, J. (2012). Wild globalization: The biopolitics of climate change and global capitalism on Nicaragua’s mosquito coast. Antipode, 44(1), 10-30. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00834.x Search in Google Scholar

[8] Dah-gbeto, A., & Villamor, G. (2016). Gender-specific responses to climate variability in a semi-arid ecosystem in Northern Benin. Ambio, 45, 297-308. doi:10.1007/s13280-016-0830-5 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Djoudi, H., & Brockhaus, M. (2011). Is adaptation to climate change gender neutral? Lessons from communities dependent on livestock and forests in northern Mali. The International Forestry Review 13: 123–135 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Ely, A., Van Zwanenberg, P., Stirling, A. (2014). Broadening out and opening up technology assessment: approaches to enhance international development, co-ordination and democratisation. Res. Policy 43 (3), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.004 Search in Google Scholar

[11] Ensor, J.E., Wennstrom, P., Bhatterai, A., Nightingale, A.J., Eriksen, S., Sillmann, J. (2019). Asking the right questions in adaptation research and practice: Seeing beyond climate impacts in rural Nepal. Environmental Science and Policy 94 227-236 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599. doi:10.2307/3178066 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Hesse-Biber, S. (2010). Mixed methods research: Merging theory with practice. New York: Guilford Search in Google Scholar

[14] Hesse-Biber, S. (2012). Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications Search in Google Scholar

[15] Hesse-Biber, S. (2017). The practice of qualitative research: Engaging students in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Search in Google Scholar

[16] Howlett, M. (2009). Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 52(2), 153-175. doi:10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00070_1.x Search in Google Scholar

[17] Hulme, M. (2010). Cosmopolitan climates: Hybridity, foresight and meaning. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2), 267-276. doi:10.1177/0263276409358730 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Mather, J. R., Field, R. T., Kalkstein, L. S., & Willmott, C. J. (1980). Climatology: The challenge for the eighties. The Professional Geographer, 32(3), 285-292. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1980.00285.x Search in Google Scholar

[19] Meinzen-Dick, R., Kovarik, C., & Quisumbing, A. R. (2014). Gender and sustainability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39(1), 29-55. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-101813-013240 Search in Google Scholar

[20] Mertens, D.M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York, NY: Guilford Search in Google Scholar

[21] Mertens, D.M. (2014). Mixed methods and wicked problems. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, pp 1-4. doi:10.1177/1558689814562944 Search in Google Scholar

[22] Mertens, D.M. & Stewart, N. (2014). The feminist practice of program evaluation. In S.N. Hesse-Biber, ed. Feminist research practice: A primer. (pp. 330-362). 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Search in Google Scholar

[23] Mertens, D.M. (2018). Mixed methods design in evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Mies, M., & Shiva, V. (1993). Ecofeminism. Halifax, N.S : London; Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Fernwood Publications; Zed Books Search in Google Scholar

[25] Murphy, B. L. (2011). From interdisciplinary to inter-epistemological approaches: Confronting the challenges of integrated climate change research. Canadian Geographer /Le Géographe Canadien, 55(4), 490-509. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0064.2011.00388.x Search in Google Scholar

[26] Nightingale, A. (2003). A Feminist in the Forest: Situated Knowledges and Mixing Methods in Natural Resource Management. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 2(1), 77-90 Search in Google Scholar

[27] Nightingale, A.J. (2016). Adaptive scholarship and situated knowledges? Hybrid methodologies and plural epistemologies in climate change adaptation research. Area 48 (1) 41-7 Search in Google Scholar

[28] Nightingale, A., Richardson, D., Castree, N.,Goodchild, M., Kobayashi, A., Liu, W. & Marston, R. (2017). Environment and gender. 10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0667. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Omari, K. (2010). Gender and climate change: Botswana case study. Heinrich-Bo¨ll Stiftung, Cape Town. Retrieved 20 July, 2014, from http://www.za.boell.org/downloads/Botswana(1).pdf Search in Google Scholar

[30] Popke, J. (2016). Researching the hybrid geographies of climate change: Reflections from the field. Area 48(1), 2-6. doi:10.1111/area.12220 Search in Google Scholar

[31] Raghuram, P., Rocheleau, D., Thomas-Slayter, B., & Wangari, E. (1998). Feminist political ecology: Global issues and local experiences. doi:10.2307/3060380 Search in Google Scholar

[32] Resurrección, B. P. (2013). Persistent women and environment linkages in climate change and sustainable development agendas. Women’s Studies International Forum, 40, 33-43. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2013.03.011 Search in Google Scholar

[33] Shiva, V. (1988). Staying alive: Women, ecology, and development. London; Atlantic Highlands, N.J., USA: Zed Books Search in Google Scholar

[34] Tschakert, P., & Machado, M. (2012). Gender Justice and Rights in Climate Change Adaptation: Opportunities and Pitfalls. Ethics and Social Welfare, 6(3), 275-289. doi: 10.1080/17496535.2012.704929 Search in Google Scholar

[35] Vij, S., Biesbroek, R., Groot, A., & Termeer, K. (2018). Changing climate policy paradigms in Bangladesh and Nepal. Environmental Science and Policy, 81, 77-85. doi:10.1016/j. envsci.2017.12.010 Search in Google Scholar

[36] Villamor, G. B., & Badmos, B. K. (2016). Grazing game a learning tool for adaptive management in response to climate variability in semiarid areas of Ghana. Ecology and Society, 21(1). doi:10.5751/ES-08139-210139 Search in Google Scholar

[37] Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. ISBN 978-1-4129-6099-1 Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2353-5415
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
Volume Open
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Philosophie, Metaphysik, Ontologie, Erkenntnistheorie, Sozialwissenschaften, Pädagogik, Bildungssysteme