[Aarts, Bas, Joanna Close, Geoffrey Leech and Sean Wallis (eds.). 2013. The verb phrase in English: Investigating recent language change with corpora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139060998]Search in Google Scholar
[Bauer, Laurie. 1994. Watching English change: An introduction to the study of linguistic change in Standard Englishes in the twentieth century. London: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bell, Philip and Theo van Leeuwen. 1994. The media interview: Confession, contest, conversation. Kensington: University of New South Wales Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Biber, Douglas. 1993. Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing 8: 243–257.10.1093/llc/8.4.243]Search in Google Scholar
[Biber, Douglas and Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511814358]Search in Google Scholar
[Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Castell, Sarah. 1999. Phone-ins and chat shows. In P. Childs and M. Storry (eds.). Encyclopaedia of contemporary British culture, 392–292. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chang, Phoebe. 2002. Who’s behind the personal pronouns in talk radio? Cartalk: A case study. In A. Sánchez-Macarro (ed.). Windows on the world: Media discourse in English, 115–152. Valencia: University of Valencia Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Corrigan, Karen, Isabelle Buchstaller, Adam Mearns and Hermann Moisl. 2012. The Diachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English (DECTE). Newcastle University. http://research.ncl.ac.uk/decte.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0009]Search in Google Scholar
[Gast, Volker, Lisa Deringer, Florian Haas and Olga Rudolf. 2015. Impersonal uses of the second person singular: A pragmatic analysis of generalization and empathy effects. Journal of Pragmatics 88: 148–162.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.12.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Gordon, Elizabeth, Margaret Maclagan and Jennifer Hay. 2007. The ONZE Corpus. In J. Beal, K. Corrigan and H. Moisl (eds.). Creating and digitizing language corpora. Vol. 2: Diachronic databases, 82–104. Basingstoke: Palgrave.10.1057/9780230223202_4]Search in Google Scholar
[Haas, Florian. Forthcoming. “You can’t control a thing like that”: Genres and changes in Modern English human impersonal pronouns. In R.J. Whitt (ed.). Diachronic corpora, genre and language change. Amsterdam: Benjamins.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hendy, David. 2007. Life on air: A history of Radio Four. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoffman, Michol and James Walker. 2010. Ethnolects and the city: Ethnic orientation and linguistic variation in Toronto English. Language Variation and Change 22: 37–67.10.1017/S0954394509990238]Search in Google Scholar
[Hundt, Marianne and Christian Mair. 1999. ‘Agile’ and ‘uptight’ genres: The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4: 221–242.10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun]Search in Google Scholar
[Ito, Rika and Sali Tagliamonte. 2003. Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society 32: 257–79.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jucker, Andreas and Daniela Landert. 2015. Historical pragmatics and early speech recordings: Diachronic developments in turn-taking and narrative structure in radio talk shows. Journal of Pragmatics 79: 22–39.10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 2: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair and Nicholas Smith. 2009. Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511642210]Search in Google Scholar
[Love, Robbie, Claire Dembry, Andrew Hardie, Vaclav Brezina and Tony McEnery. 2017. The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22 (3): 319–344.10.1075/ijcl.22.3.02lov]Search in Google Scholar
[Magee, Sean. 2012. Desert Island Discs: 70 years of castaways from one of BBC Radio 4’s best-loved programmes. London: Bantam.]Search in Google Scholar
[Millar, Neil. 2009. Modal verbs in TIME: Frequency changes 1923–2006. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14 (2): 191–220.10.1075/ijcl.14.2.03mil]Search in Google Scholar
[Milroy, Lesley and Matthew Gordon. 2003. Sociolinguistics: Methods and interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470758359]Search in Google Scholar
[Ndaji, Francis, John Little and Robert Coe. 2016. A comparison of academic achievement in independent and state schools: Report for the Independent Schools Council. Centre for Evaluation and Monitoring, University of Durham. http://www.isc.co.uk/media/3140/16_02_26-cem-durham-university-academic-value-added-research.pdf (accessed 2017-12-20).]Search in Google Scholar
[Nevalainen, Terttu and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (eds.). 2003. Sociolinguistics and language history: Studies based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Amsterdam: Rodopi.]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Keeffe, Anne. 2005. Investigating media discourse. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203015704]Search in Google Scholar
[Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxforddnb.com/, (accessed 2017-12-20).]Search in Google Scholar
[Price, Jenny. 2012. Old news: Rethinking language change through Australian broadcast speech. In Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.). The Oxford handbook of the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0030]Search in Google Scholar
[Rayson, Paul. 2008. From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13 (4): 519–549.10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06ray]Search in Google Scholar
[Sankoff, David and Susan Laberge. 1978. The linguistic market and the statistical explanation of variability. In D. Sankoff (ed.). Linguistic variation: Models and methods, 239–250. New York: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sankoff, David, Henrietta Cedergren, William Kemp, Pierette Thibault and Diane Vincent. 1989. Montreal French: Language, class and ideology. In R. Fasold and D. Schiffrin (eds.). Language change and variation, 107–118. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.52.06san]Search in Google Scholar
[Scannell, Paddy. 1989. Public service broadcasting and modern public life. Media, Culture and Society 11 (2): 134–166.10.1177/016344389011002002]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, Nicholas and Cathleen Waters. (Under review). Variation and change in a specialized register: A comparison of random and sociolinguistic sampling in Desert Island Discs.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tagliamonte, Sali. 2002. Variation and change in the British relative marker system. In P. Poussa (ed.). Relativization in the North Sea Littoral: Proceedings of the North Sea Littoral Conference, 147–165. Umeå, Sweden: Lincom Europa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tagliamonte, Sali. 2006. Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511801624]Search in Google Scholar
[Van de Velde, Hans, Roeland van Hout and Marinel Gerritsen. 1997. Watching Dutch change: A real-time study of variation and change in standard Dutch pronunciation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1 (3): 361–391.10.1111/1467-9481.00021]Search in Google Scholar
[Waters, Cathleen. 2013. Transatlantic variation in English adverb placement. Language Variation and Change 25: 179–200.10.1017/S0954394513000082]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar