1. bookVolumen 8 (2016): Heft 3 (September 2016)
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1803-8417
Erstveröffentlichung
24 Feb 2009
Erscheinungsweise
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Regional Development and Climate Change Adaptation: A Study of the Role of Legitimacy

Online veröffentlicht: 18 Oct 2016
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 8 (2016) - Heft 3 (September 2016)
Seitenbereich: 207 - 226
Eingereicht: 21 Mar 2016
Akzeptiert: 22 Jul 2016
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
1803-8417
Erstveröffentlichung
24 Feb 2009
Erscheinungsweise
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch

[1] Bäckstrand, K. (2008). Accountability of Networked Climate Governance: The Rise of Transnational Climate Partnerships. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 74-102. DOI: 10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.74.10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.74DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[2] Beck, U. (2006). Reflexive governance: politics in the global risk society. In Voss, J.-P., Bauknecht, D. & Kemp, R. (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 31-56). Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bulkeley, H., & Newell, P. (2010). Governing climate change. London ; New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203858295Search in Google Scholar

[4] Dax, T., Strahl, W., Kirwan, J., & Maye, D. (2016). The Leader programme 2007-2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(1), 56-68. DOI: 10.1177/0969776413490425.10.1177/0969776413490425DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[5] Deephouse, D. L. & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism (pp. 49-77). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 49.10.4135/9781849200387.n2Search in Google Scholar

[6] Delin, M. (2012). The role of farmers in Local Action Groups: The case of the national network of the Local Action Groups in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika), 58(9), 433-442.10.17221/148/2011-AGRICECONSearch in Google Scholar

[7] Dingwerth, K. (2007). The New Transnationalism: Private Transnational Governance and its Democratic Legitimacy. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230590144Search in Google Scholar

[8] Dostál, J. (2012). Cooperation between non-governmental organizations and the State in the matter of flood risk management in the Czech Republic. In Proverbs, D. G. ed., Flood recovery, innovation and response III (pp. 15-26). Southampton: WIT Press. DOI: 10.2495/FRIAR120021.10.2495/FRIAR120021DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[9] Dwyer, J. & Findeis, J. (2008). Human and Social Capital in Rural Development – EU and US Perspectives Human- und Sozialkapital in der Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums – Perspektiven aus der EU und den USA Le capital social et humain dans le développement rural: Perspectives aux États-Unis et dans l’Union européenne. EuroChoices, 7(1), 38-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-692X.2008.00084.x.10.1111/j.1746-692X.2008.00084.xDOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[10] ECONADPT. (2015). The Costs and Benefits of Adaptation: Results from the ECONADAPT Project. The ECONADAPT consortium. Retrieved from http://econadapt.eu/docs/Econadapt-policy-report-on-costs-and-benefits-of-adaptaiton-july-draft-2015.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Ensor, J. & Berger, R. (2009). Community Based Adaptation and Culture in Theory and Practice. In Adger, W. N., Lorenzoni, I. & O’Brien, K. L. (Eds.), Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance (pp. 227-239). Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[12] European Commission. (2006). The Leader approach: a basic guide. Luxembourg: EUR-OP. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/fact/leader/2006_en.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[13] European Commission. (2010). Eurobarometer. 1. Life in the European Union (Standard Eurobarometer No. 70) (p. 209). European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb70/eb70_part1_en.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[14] European Commission. (2013). An EU Strategy on adaptation to climate change. (Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions No. COM (2013) 216 final). Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from http://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013DC0216&from=EN.Search in Google Scholar

[15] European Court of Auditors. (2010). Implementation of the Leader approach for rural development: (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Forsberg, E.-M. (2012a). Applying instruments for regional innovation – generating projects or legitimacy? International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 4(5), 430-445. DOI: 10.1504/IJIRD.2012.048995.10.1504/IJIRD.2012.048995DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[17] Forsberg, E.-M. (2012b). Standardisation in the Field of Nanotechnology: Some Issues of Legitimacy. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(4), 719-739. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-011-9268-0.10.1007/s11948-011-9268-021424592DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[18] Glaas, E., Jonsson, A., Hjerpe, M. & Andersson-Sköld, Y. (2010). Managing climate change vulnerabilities: formal institutions and knowledge use as determinants of adaptive capacity at the local level in Sweden. Local Environment, 15(6), 525-539. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2010.487525.10.1080/13549839.2010.487525DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[19] Hudečková, H. & Lošťák, M. (2008). LEADER in the Czech Republic and farming sector. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika), 54(12), 555-565.10.17221/289-AGRICECONSearch in Google Scholar

[20] IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: Working Group II contribution to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Katona-Kovács, J., High, C. & Nemes, G. (2011). Importance of Animation Actions in the Operation of Hungarian Local Action Groups. European Countryside, 3(4), 227-240. DOI: 10.2478/v10091-012-0006-7.10.2478/v10091-012-0006-7DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[22] Kumar, R. & Das, T. K. (2007). Interpartner Legitimacy in the Alliance Development Process*. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8), 1425-1453. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00709.x.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00709.xDOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[23] Lederer, M. (2011). From CDM to REDD+ – What do we know for setting up effective and legitimate carbon governance? Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1900-1907. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.003.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.003DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[24] Lošťák, M. & Hudečková, H. (2010). Preliminary impacts of the LEADER+ approach in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika), 56, 249-265.10.17221/27/2010-AGRICECONSearch in Google Scholar

[25] Low, B. & Johnston, W. J. (2010). Organizational network legitimacy and its impact on knowledge networks: the case of China’s TD-SCDMA mobility technology. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 25(6), 468-477. DOI: 10.1108/08858621011066053.10.1108/08858621011066053DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[26] Majule, A. E., Stathers, T., Lamboll, R., Liwenga, E. T., Ngongondo, C., Kalanda-Joshua, M., Swai, E. & Chipungu, F. (2013). Enhancing capacities of individuals, institutions and organizations to adapt to climate change in agricultural sector using innovation system approaches in Tanzania and Malawi. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1(6), 220-231.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Maurel, M.-C. (2008). Local Development Stakeholders and the European Model: Learning the LEADER Approach in the New Member States. Czech Sociological Review, 44(3), 511-530.10.13060/00380288.2008.44.3.04Search in Google Scholar

[28] Moser, S. C. & Ekstrom, J. A. (2010). A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(51), 22026-22031. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1007887107.10.1073/pnas.1007887107300975721135232DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[29] National Network of Local Action Groups in the Czech Republic. (2011, May). NATIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN. LEADER 2014+. Retrieved from http://nsmascr.cz/content/uploads/2012/07/NATIONAL-STRATEGIC-PLAN-LEADER-2014+-SUMMARY.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[30] OECD. (2014). Society at a Glance 2014. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/society-at-a-glance-2014_soc_glance-2014-en.Search in Google Scholar

[31] OECD. (2015). Climate Change Risks and Adaptation. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/climate-change-risks-and-adaptation_9789264234611-en.10.1787/9789264234611-enSearch in Google Scholar

[32] Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and process in modern societies. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Pechrová, M. & Boukalová, K. (2015). Differences Among Czech Local Action Groups In Using Selected Principles Of Leader*. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 46(1), 41-48. DOI: 10.1515/sab-2015-0015.10.1515/sab-2015-0015DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[34] Persson, S. G., Lundberg, H. & Andresen, E. (2011). Interpartner legitimacy in regional strategic networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(6), 1024-1031. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.027.10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.027DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[35] Ray, C. (1999). Endogenous Development in the Era of Reflexive Modernity. Journal of Rural Studies, 15(3), 257-267. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(98)00072-2.10.1016/S0743-0167(98)00072-2DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[36] Ray, C. (2000). Editorial. The EU leader Programme: Rural Development Laboratory. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(2), 163-171. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00138.10.1111/1467-9523.00138DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[37] Scott, M. (2013). Resilience: a Conceptual Lens for Rural Studies? Geography Compass, 7(9), 597-610. DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12066.10.1111/gec3.12066DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[38] Sørensen, E. (2002). Democratic Theory and Network Governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 24(4), 693-720. DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2002.11029383.10.1080/10841806.2002.11029383DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[39] Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080331.10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080331DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[40] Thuesen, A. A. (2010). Partnership Organising of Rural and Coastal Development in Denmark (Ph.d.). Syddansk Universitet. Det Samfundsvidenskabelige Fakulter. Retrieved from http://static.sdu.dk/mediafiles/A/F/A/%7BAFA43E21-7DCF-4BFC-A1C6-8DA4E1FDD6B8%7DSamlet%20LAG%20afhandling.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Thuesen, A. A. (2011). Partnerships as Associations: Input and Output Legitimacy of LEADER Partnerships in Denmark, Finland and Sweden. European Planning Studies, 19(4), 575-594. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2011.548469.10.1080/09654313.2011.548469DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[42] Thuesen, A. A. (2016). The Democratic Capabilities of and Rhetoric on LEADER LAGs in the EU – The Danish Case. In Granberg, L., Andersson, K. & Kovách, I., eds., Evaluating the European Approach to Rural Development: Grass-roots Experiences of the LEADER Programme (pp. 79-93). Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Thuessen, A. A. & Nielsen, N. C. (2014). A Territorial Perspective On EU’s Leader Approach In Denmark: The Added Value Of Community-Led Local Development Of Rural And Coastal Areas In A Multi-Level Governance Settings. European Countryside, 6(4). DOI: 10.2478/euco-2014-0017.10.2478/euco-2014-0017DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[44] Urwin, K. & Jordan, A. (2008). Does public policy support or undermine climate change adaptation? Exploring policy interplay across different scales of governance. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 180-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.08.002.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.08.002DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[45] Van Aalst, M. K., Cannon, T. & Burton, I. (2008). Community level adaptation to climate change: The potential role of participatory community risk assessment. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 165-179. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.06.002.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.06.002DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[46] Varga, E. (2009). Non-profit organizations in Hungarian rural development – a leader+ example in the southern Transdanubian region. European Countryside, 1(2), 93-103. DOI: 10.2478/v10091/009-0008-2.10.2478/v10091/009-0008-2DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[47] Ward, P. N., Atterton, D. J., Kim, T., Lowe, P. P., Phillipson, J. & Thompson, D. N. (2005). Universities, the Knowledge Economy and “Neo-Endogenous Rural Development”. Retrieved from http://eprint.ncl.ac.uk/pub_details2.aspx?pub_id=148470.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (1. pbk. ed., reprint). New York, NY: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Weichselgartner, J. & Pigeon, P. (2015). The Role of Knowledge in Disaster Risk Reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 6(2), 107-116. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-015-0052-7.10.1007/s13753-015-0052-7DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

[50] Winsvold, M., Stokke, K. B., Klausen, J. E. & Saglie, I. L. (2009). Organizational learning and governance in adaptation in urban development (pp. 476-490). In Adger, N., Lorenzoni, I. & O’Brien, K., eds., Adapting to climate change. Thresholds, values, governance.Search in Google Scholar

[51] Wynne, B. (1996). May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert–Lay Knowledge Divide. In Lash, S., Szerszynski, B. & Wynne, B. (Eds.), Risk, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology (pp. 44-84). London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD

Planen Sie Ihre Fernkonferenz mit Scienceendo